Who and how should participate in health care priority setting? evidence from a Portuguese survey

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Botelho, Anabela
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Pinho, Micaela Moreira, Veiga, Paula Alexandra
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/1822/17127
Resumo: This article provides highlights of the evolution of the health care rationing debate towards a more transparent and open approach involving public participation. Discretionary models that have dominated health sector decision-making are being questioned by different sectors of society. Using data from 442 college students, we explore public’s views on its involvement in health care rationing decisions. Findings suggest that although citizens wish to be consulted, they believe doctors should play the most important role on the rationing decisions. Nonetheless, the confidence in doctors is not independent of the criteria used to support their decisions.
id RCAP_90678be09dda7a77772d7c07b768523c
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/17127
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Who and how should participate in health care priority setting? evidence from a Portuguese surveyPriorities settingPublic involvementExplicit rationingHealth-careThis article provides highlights of the evolution of the health care rationing debate towards a more transparent and open approach involving public participation. Discretionary models that have dominated health sector decision-making are being questioned by different sectors of society. Using data from 442 college students, we explore public’s views on its involvement in health care rationing decisions. Findings suggest that although citizens wish to be consulted, they believe doctors should play the most important role on the rationing decisions. Nonetheless, the confidence in doctors is not independent of the criteria used to support their decisions.This research was partially funded by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) through the Applied Microeconomics Research Unit (NIMA) award no. PEst-OE/EGE/UI3181/2011Universidade do Minho. Núcleo de Investigação em Microeconomia Aplicada (NIMA)Universidade do MinhoBotelho, AnabelaPinho, Micaela MoreiraVeiga, Paula Alexandra2011-122011-12-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1822/17127enghttp://nima.eeg.uminho.ptinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-21T11:56:06Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/17127Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T18:45:42.828381Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Who and how should participate in health care priority setting? evidence from a Portuguese survey
title Who and how should participate in health care priority setting? evidence from a Portuguese survey
spellingShingle Who and how should participate in health care priority setting? evidence from a Portuguese survey
Botelho, Anabela
Priorities setting
Public involvement
Explicit rationing
Health-care
title_short Who and how should participate in health care priority setting? evidence from a Portuguese survey
title_full Who and how should participate in health care priority setting? evidence from a Portuguese survey
title_fullStr Who and how should participate in health care priority setting? evidence from a Portuguese survey
title_full_unstemmed Who and how should participate in health care priority setting? evidence from a Portuguese survey
title_sort Who and how should participate in health care priority setting? evidence from a Portuguese survey
author Botelho, Anabela
author_facet Botelho, Anabela
Pinho, Micaela Moreira
Veiga, Paula Alexandra
author_role author
author2 Pinho, Micaela Moreira
Veiga, Paula Alexandra
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Minho
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Botelho, Anabela
Pinho, Micaela Moreira
Veiga, Paula Alexandra
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Priorities setting
Public involvement
Explicit rationing
Health-care
topic Priorities setting
Public involvement
Explicit rationing
Health-care
description This article provides highlights of the evolution of the health care rationing debate towards a more transparent and open approach involving public participation. Discretionary models that have dominated health sector decision-making are being questioned by different sectors of society. Using data from 442 college students, we explore public’s views on its involvement in health care rationing decisions. Findings suggest that although citizens wish to be consulted, they believe doctors should play the most important role on the rationing decisions. Nonetheless, the confidence in doctors is not independent of the criteria used to support their decisions.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-12
2011-12-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/1822/17127
url http://hdl.handle.net/1822/17127
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://nima.eeg.uminho.pt
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Minho. Núcleo de Investigação em Microeconomia Aplicada (NIMA)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Minho. Núcleo de Investigação em Microeconomia Aplicada (NIMA)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799132210704416768

Registros relacionados