Who and How should participate in health care priority setting? Evidence from a Portuguese survey.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Botelho, Anabela
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Pinho, Micaela, Veiga, Paula Alexandra Correia Veloso
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/11328/277
Resumo: This article provides highlights of the evolution of the health care rationing debate towards a more transparent and open approach involving public participation. Discretionary models that have dominated health sector decision-making are being questioned by different sectors of society. Using data from 442 college students, we explore public’s views on its involvement in health care rationing decisions. Findings suggest that although citizens wish to be consulted, they believe doctors should play the most important role on the rationing decisions. Nonetheless, the confidence in doctors is not independent of the criteria used to support their decisions.
id RCAP_cc7210d40186e091c120041e9a6143ae
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.upt.pt:11328/277
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Who and How should participate in health care priority setting? Evidence from a Portuguese survey.Priorities settingPublic involvementExplicit rationingHealth-careThis article provides highlights of the evolution of the health care rationing debate towards a more transparent and open approach involving public participation. Discretionary models that have dominated health sector decision-making are being questioned by different sectors of society. Using data from 442 college students, we explore public’s views on its involvement in health care rationing decisions. Findings suggest that although citizens wish to be consulted, they believe doctors should play the most important role on the rationing decisions. Nonetheless, the confidence in doctors is not independent of the criteria used to support their decisions.Universidade do Minho2013-08-14T18:09:43Z2013-08-142011-12-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfPinho, M., Botelho, A., & Veiga, P. (2011). Who and How should participate in health care priority setting? Evidence from a Portuguese survey, Working Paper Series, 43, 1-19. Núcleo de Investigação em Microeconomia Aplicada da Universidade do Minho. Repositório Institucional UPT. http://hdl.handle.net/11328/277http://hdl.handle.net/11328/277Pinho, M., Botelho, A., & Veiga, P. (2011). Who and How should participate in health care priority setting? Evidence from a Portuguese survey, Working Paper Series, 43, 1-19. Núcleo de Investigação em Microeconomia Aplicada da Universidade do Minho. Repositório Institucional UPT. http://hdl.handle.net/11328/277http://hdl.handle.net/11328/277engBotelho, AnabelaPinho, MicaelaVeiga, Paula Alexandra Correia Velosoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-02-22T04:24:11Zoai:repositorio.upt.pt:11328/277Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:41:29.967597Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Who and How should participate in health care priority setting? Evidence from a Portuguese survey.
title Who and How should participate in health care priority setting? Evidence from a Portuguese survey.
spellingShingle Who and How should participate in health care priority setting? Evidence from a Portuguese survey.
Botelho, Anabela
Priorities setting
Public involvement
Explicit rationing
Health-care
title_short Who and How should participate in health care priority setting? Evidence from a Portuguese survey.
title_full Who and How should participate in health care priority setting? Evidence from a Portuguese survey.
title_fullStr Who and How should participate in health care priority setting? Evidence from a Portuguese survey.
title_full_unstemmed Who and How should participate in health care priority setting? Evidence from a Portuguese survey.
title_sort Who and How should participate in health care priority setting? Evidence from a Portuguese survey.
author Botelho, Anabela
author_facet Botelho, Anabela
Pinho, Micaela
Veiga, Paula Alexandra Correia Veloso
author_role author
author2 Pinho, Micaela
Veiga, Paula Alexandra Correia Veloso
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Botelho, Anabela
Pinho, Micaela
Veiga, Paula Alexandra Correia Veloso
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Priorities setting
Public involvement
Explicit rationing
Health-care
topic Priorities setting
Public involvement
Explicit rationing
Health-care
description This article provides highlights of the evolution of the health care rationing debate towards a more transparent and open approach involving public participation. Discretionary models that have dominated health sector decision-making are being questioned by different sectors of society. Using data from 442 college students, we explore public’s views on its involvement in health care rationing decisions. Findings suggest that although citizens wish to be consulted, they believe doctors should play the most important role on the rationing decisions. Nonetheless, the confidence in doctors is not independent of the criteria used to support their decisions.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-12-01T00:00:00Z
2013-08-14T18:09:43Z
2013-08-14
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Pinho, M., Botelho, A., & Veiga, P. (2011). Who and How should participate in health care priority setting? Evidence from a Portuguese survey, Working Paper Series, 43, 1-19. Núcleo de Investigação em Microeconomia Aplicada da Universidade do Minho. Repositório Institucional UPT. http://hdl.handle.net/11328/277
http://hdl.handle.net/11328/277
Pinho, M., Botelho, A., & Veiga, P. (2011). Who and How should participate in health care priority setting? Evidence from a Portuguese survey, Working Paper Series, 43, 1-19. Núcleo de Investigação em Microeconomia Aplicada da Universidade do Minho. Repositório Institucional UPT. http://hdl.handle.net/11328/277
http://hdl.handle.net/11328/277
identifier_str_mv Pinho, M., Botelho, A., & Veiga, P. (2011). Who and How should participate in health care priority setting? Evidence from a Portuguese survey, Working Paper Series, 43, 1-19. Núcleo de Investigação em Microeconomia Aplicada da Universidade do Minho. Repositório Institucional UPT. http://hdl.handle.net/11328/277
url http://hdl.handle.net/11328/277
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Minho
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Minho
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134978923036672

Registros relacionados