UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE AND ENFORCED BENEFICENCE

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Hanisch, Christoph
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.21814/eps.2.1.82
Resumo: I examine Allen Buchanan’s arguments for enforced beneficence and express a number of worries concerning his attempt to justify coercive distributive policies that guarantee (basic) health care services for all citizens. The central objection questions whether, given Buchanan’s own stipulation of universallyinstantiated attitudes of moral beneficence amongst all society members, his arguments from, first, the coordination problem and, second, the assurance problem successfully establish a justification of enforced contribution. I defend alternative, non-coercive, responses to the aforementioned problems and show that a particular kind of institution (an “information service”) provides all citizens with the sufficient and reliable epistemic resources so that they can effectively help the sick and needy. I notice that Buchanan’s difficulties with justifying coercion can be regarded as providing indirect support for the view that developing a justice-based conception of moral health care rights remains, pace Buchanan, an important task to be completed.
id RCAP_91401de4a35c7ee140c2272f17947caa
oai_identifier_str oai:journals.uminho.pt:article/4673
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE AND ENFORCED BENEFICENCECUIDADOS UNIVERSAIS DE SAÚDE E BENEFICÊNCIA OBRIGATÓRIAOriginal ArticlesI examine Allen Buchanan’s arguments for enforced beneficence and express a number of worries concerning his attempt to justify coercive distributive policies that guarantee (basic) health care services for all citizens. The central objection questions whether, given Buchanan’s own stipulation of universallyinstantiated attitudes of moral beneficence amongst all society members, his arguments from, first, the coordination problem and, second, the assurance problem successfully establish a justification of enforced contribution. I defend alternative, non-coercive, responses to the aforementioned problems and show that a particular kind of institution (an “information service”) provides all citizens with the sufficient and reliable epistemic resources so that they can effectively help the sick and needy. I notice that Buchanan’s difficulties with justifying coercion can be regarded as providing indirect support for the view that developing a justice-based conception of moral health care rights remains, pace Buchanan, an important task to be completed.Neste artigo examino os argumentos de Allen Buchanan a favor da beneficência obrigatória e formulo uma série de preocupações relativas à sua tentativa de justificar políticas distributivas coercivas que garantam serviços de saúde (básicos) para todos os cidadãos. Dada a estipulação de Buchanan sobre as atitudes universalmente instanciadas de beneficência moral entre todos os membros da sociedade, a nossa objeção central questiona se os seus argumentos sobre o problema de coordenação assim como o problema de garantia estabelecem uma justificação da contribuição obrigatória. Defendo respostas alternativas e não coercitivas aos problemas acima mencionados e mostro que um tipo particular de instituição (um “serviço de informação”) fornece a todos os cidadãos recursos epistêmicos suficientes e confiáveis para que possam efetivamente ajudar os doentes e os necessitados. Noto por fim que as dificuldades de Buchanan em justificar a coerção podem ser consideradas como um apoio indireto à visão segundo a qual o desenvolvimento de uma concepção baseada na justiça dos direitos morais à assistência médica permanece, segundo Buchanan, uma tarefa importante que deve ser completada.Centre for Ethics, Politics, and Society - ELACH, University of Minho2023-09-29info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://doi.org/10.21814/eps.2.1.82eng2184-25822184-2574Hanisch, Christophinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-29T10:56:34Zoai:journals.uminho.pt:article/4673Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:58:41.776998Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE AND ENFORCED BENEFICENCE
CUIDADOS UNIVERSAIS DE SAÚDE E BENEFICÊNCIA OBRIGATÓRIA
title UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE AND ENFORCED BENEFICENCE
spellingShingle UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE AND ENFORCED BENEFICENCE
Hanisch, Christoph
Original Articles
title_short UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE AND ENFORCED BENEFICENCE
title_full UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE AND ENFORCED BENEFICENCE
title_fullStr UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE AND ENFORCED BENEFICENCE
title_full_unstemmed UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE AND ENFORCED BENEFICENCE
title_sort UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE AND ENFORCED BENEFICENCE
author Hanisch, Christoph
author_facet Hanisch, Christoph
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Hanisch, Christoph
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Original Articles
topic Original Articles
description I examine Allen Buchanan’s arguments for enforced beneficence and express a number of worries concerning his attempt to justify coercive distributive policies that guarantee (basic) health care services for all citizens. The central objection questions whether, given Buchanan’s own stipulation of universallyinstantiated attitudes of moral beneficence amongst all society members, his arguments from, first, the coordination problem and, second, the assurance problem successfully establish a justification of enforced contribution. I defend alternative, non-coercive, responses to the aforementioned problems and show that a particular kind of institution (an “information service”) provides all citizens with the sufficient and reliable epistemic resources so that they can effectively help the sick and needy. I notice that Buchanan’s difficulties with justifying coercion can be regarded as providing indirect support for the view that developing a justice-based conception of moral health care rights remains, pace Buchanan, an important task to be completed.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-09-29
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.21814/eps.2.1.82
url https://doi.org/10.21814/eps.2.1.82
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2184-2582
2184-2574
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centre for Ethics, Politics, and Society - ELACH, University of Minho
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centre for Ethics, Politics, and Society - ELACH, University of Minho
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137071296675840