Epidural Analgesia for Better Pain Control After Surgery in Children
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
DOI: | 10.25754/pjp.2020.19401 |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.25754/pjp.2020.19401 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Postoperative pain in children is sometimes inadequately prevented and treated. Analgesics are mainly administered through intravenous route yet regional analgesia can also be used. The purpose of this study is to better understand the effects of combining epidural with standard analgesia in achieving postoperative pain relief. Methods: Retrospective chart review of postoperative pediatric patients, following genito-urinary surgery, admitted to an acute care pediatric unit during a 5 year period. Demographic and clinical variables were collected, including pain evaluation and analgesia in the first three days. Two groups were considered, Group A: standard analgesia; Group B: standard and epidural analgesia. Results: Thirty-nine postoperative admissions were analyzed (34 patients): Group A – 15; Group B – 24. Median age was 2.29 [0.46-13.17] years old with 60% male (Group A) and 6.19 [0.38-17] years old with 75% male (Group B). Median sum of pain intensity score was lower in Group B (1 vs 0.43; p 0.049) and less ketorolac and morphine doses were administered in Group B (2 vs 1, p 0.044; 2 vs 0, p 0.014). No important side effects were noted in either group. Epidural catheter was in place for a mean time of 50 hours. Length of stay was similar in both groups. Discussion: Better pain relief was achieved through epidural analgesia, carrying no associated complications, and allowing lower use of rescue medication. Results are similar to published literature, reinforcing that this type of analgesia should be explored as an alternative in children. |
id |
RCAP_91e642336955e4647d97dc275c5a9076 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/19401 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Epidural Analgesia for Better Pain Control After Surgery in ChildrenAnalgesia epidural para melhor controlo da dor no pós-operatório em PediatriaOriginal articlesIntroduction: Postoperative pain in children is sometimes inadequately prevented and treated. Analgesics are mainly administered through intravenous route yet regional analgesia can also be used. The purpose of this study is to better understand the effects of combining epidural with standard analgesia in achieving postoperative pain relief. Methods: Retrospective chart review of postoperative pediatric patients, following genito-urinary surgery, admitted to an acute care pediatric unit during a 5 year period. Demographic and clinical variables were collected, including pain evaluation and analgesia in the first three days. Two groups were considered, Group A: standard analgesia; Group B: standard and epidural analgesia. Results: Thirty-nine postoperative admissions were analyzed (34 patients): Group A – 15; Group B – 24. Median age was 2.29 [0.46-13.17] years old with 60% male (Group A) and 6.19 [0.38-17] years old with 75% male (Group B). Median sum of pain intensity score was lower in Group B (1 vs 0.43; p 0.049) and less ketorolac and morphine doses were administered in Group B (2 vs 1, p 0.044; 2 vs 0, p 0.014). No important side effects were noted in either group. Epidural catheter was in place for a mean time of 50 hours. Length of stay was similar in both groups. Discussion: Better pain relief was achieved through epidural analgesia, carrying no associated complications, and allowing lower use of rescue medication. Results are similar to published literature, reinforcing that this type of analgesia should be explored as an alternative in children.Contexto: A dor no pós-operatório em crianças deve ser prevenida sempre que possível e tratada adequadamente. Os analgésicos são administrados maioritariamente por via endovenosa. A analgesia regional através de cateteres epidurais pode ser uma alternativa no controlo da dor e é ainda pouco utilizada. Objectivos: Comparar a analgesia regional através de cateteres epidurais versus a analgesia endovenosa standard isoladamente para controlo da dor no pós-operatório de doentes admitidos numa unidade de cuidados intensivos pediátricos. Métodos: Revisão retrospectiva dos processos de doentes admitidos após cirurgia genito-urinária de 2013 a 2017. Recolhidos os dados demográficos e as variáveis clínicas, incluindo avaliação da dor (usando as escalas numérica da dor e Wong Baker) e analgesia administrada nos primeiros três dias. A mediana da intensidade dos scores de dor (ISD) foi calculada nos primeiros 3 dias de pós-operatório. Considerados 2 grupos: Grupo A – analgesia standard; Grupo B – analgesia standard e analgesia epidural. A analgesia standard incluiu paracetamol q.i.d associado a AINEs e morfina PRN. Resultados: Foram analisadas 39 admissões pós-operatórias (34 doentes): Grupo A – 15; Grupo B – 24. A mediana de idades foi 2.29 [0.46-13.17] anos com 60% do sexo masculino (Grupo A) e 6.19 [0.38-17] com 7.5% do sexo masculino (Grupo B). A mediana da ISD foi mais baixa no grupo B (1 vs 0.43; p 0.049). Além disso, foi administrado menos cetorolac e menos morfina (2 vs 1, p 0.044; 2 vs 0, p 0.014) no grupo B. Não se registaram efeitos adversos importantes em nenhum dos grupos. Os cateteres epidurais ficaram colocados em média 50 horas. O tempo de internamento foi semelhante em ambos os grupos. Conclusão: O controlo da dor no pós-operatório de cirurgias genito-urinárias foi melhor com a analgesia epidural, permitindo uma menor utilização de terapêutica de resgate, sem complicações associadas. A analgesia epidural parece ser um método seguro e eficaz neste grupo etário.Sociedade Portuguesa de Pediatria2020-10-14info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://doi.org/10.25754/pjp.2020.19401eng2184-44532184-3333Borges, CatarinaCoelho, RitaAbadesso,, ClaraMoniz, MartaEscobar, CarlosNunes, PedroAlmeida, Helenainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-05-06T15:12:26Zoai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/19401Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openairemluisa.alvim@gmail.comopendoar:71602024-05-06T15:12:26Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Epidural Analgesia for Better Pain Control After Surgery in Children Analgesia epidural para melhor controlo da dor no pós-operatório em Pediatria |
title |
Epidural Analgesia for Better Pain Control After Surgery in Children |
spellingShingle |
Epidural Analgesia for Better Pain Control After Surgery in Children Epidural Analgesia for Better Pain Control After Surgery in Children Borges, Catarina Original articles Borges, Catarina Original articles |
title_short |
Epidural Analgesia for Better Pain Control After Surgery in Children |
title_full |
Epidural Analgesia for Better Pain Control After Surgery in Children |
title_fullStr |
Epidural Analgesia for Better Pain Control After Surgery in Children Epidural Analgesia for Better Pain Control After Surgery in Children |
title_full_unstemmed |
Epidural Analgesia for Better Pain Control After Surgery in Children Epidural Analgesia for Better Pain Control After Surgery in Children |
title_sort |
Epidural Analgesia for Better Pain Control After Surgery in Children |
author |
Borges, Catarina |
author_facet |
Borges, Catarina Borges, Catarina Coelho, Rita Abadesso,, Clara Moniz, Marta Escobar, Carlos Nunes, Pedro Almeida, Helena Coelho, Rita Abadesso,, Clara Moniz, Marta Escobar, Carlos Nunes, Pedro Almeida, Helena |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Coelho, Rita Abadesso,, Clara Moniz, Marta Escobar, Carlos Nunes, Pedro Almeida, Helena |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Borges, Catarina Coelho, Rita Abadesso,, Clara Moniz, Marta Escobar, Carlos Nunes, Pedro Almeida, Helena |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Original articles |
topic |
Original articles |
description |
Introduction: Postoperative pain in children is sometimes inadequately prevented and treated. Analgesics are mainly administered through intravenous route yet regional analgesia can also be used. The purpose of this study is to better understand the effects of combining epidural with standard analgesia in achieving postoperative pain relief. Methods: Retrospective chart review of postoperative pediatric patients, following genito-urinary surgery, admitted to an acute care pediatric unit during a 5 year period. Demographic and clinical variables were collected, including pain evaluation and analgesia in the first three days. Two groups were considered, Group A: standard analgesia; Group B: standard and epidural analgesia. Results: Thirty-nine postoperative admissions were analyzed (34 patients): Group A – 15; Group B – 24. Median age was 2.29 [0.46-13.17] years old with 60% male (Group A) and 6.19 [0.38-17] years old with 75% male (Group B). Median sum of pain intensity score was lower in Group B (1 vs 0.43; p 0.049) and less ketorolac and morphine doses were administered in Group B (2 vs 1, p 0.044; 2 vs 0, p 0.014). No important side effects were noted in either group. Epidural catheter was in place for a mean time of 50 hours. Length of stay was similar in both groups. Discussion: Better pain relief was achieved through epidural analgesia, carrying no associated complications, and allowing lower use of rescue medication. Results are similar to published literature, reinforcing that this type of analgesia should be explored as an alternative in children. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-10-14 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.25754/pjp.2020.19401 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.25754/pjp.2020.19401 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
2184-4453 2184-3333 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Portuguesa de Pediatria |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Portuguesa de Pediatria |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mluisa.alvim@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1822181886647074816 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.25754/pjp.2020.19401 |