Epidural Analgesia for Better Pain Control After Surgery in Children

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Borges, Catarina
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Coelho, Rita, Abadesso,, Clara, Moniz, Marta, Escobar, Carlos, Nunes, Pedro, Almeida, Helena
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
DOI: 10.25754/pjp.2020.19401
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.25754/pjp.2020.19401
Resumo: Introduction: Postoperative pain in children is sometimes inadequately prevented and treated. Analgesics are mainly administered through intravenous route yet regional analgesia can also be used. The purpose of this study is to better understand the effects of combining epidural with standard analgesia in achieving postoperative pain relief. Methods: Retrospective chart review of postoperative pediatric patients, following genito-urinary surgery, admitted to an acute care pediatric unit during a 5 year period. Demographic and clinical variables were collected, including pain evaluation and analgesia in the first three days. Two groups were considered, Group A: standard analgesia; Group B: standard and epidural analgesia. Results: Thirty-nine postoperative admissions were analyzed (34 patients): Group A – 15; Group B – 24. Median age was 2.29 [0.46-13.17] years old with 60% male (Group A) and 6.19 [0.38-17] years old with 75% male (Group B). Median sum of pain intensity score was lower in Group B (1 vs 0.43; p 0.049) and less ketorolac and morphine doses were administered in Group B (2 vs 1, p 0.044; 2 vs 0, p 0.014). No important side effects were noted in either group. Epidural catheter was in place for a mean time of 50 hours. Length of stay was similar in both groups. Discussion: Better pain relief was achieved through epidural analgesia, carrying no associated complications, and allowing lower use of rescue medication. Results are similar to published literature, reinforcing that this type of analgesia should be explored as an alternative in children.
id RCAP_91e642336955e4647d97dc275c5a9076
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/19401
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Epidural Analgesia for Better Pain Control After Surgery in ChildrenAnalgesia epidural para melhor controlo da dor no pós-operatório em PediatriaOriginal articlesIntroduction: Postoperative pain in children is sometimes inadequately prevented and treated. Analgesics are mainly administered through intravenous route yet regional analgesia can also be used. The purpose of this study is to better understand the effects of combining epidural with standard analgesia in achieving postoperative pain relief. Methods: Retrospective chart review of postoperative pediatric patients, following genito-urinary surgery, admitted to an acute care pediatric unit during a 5 year period. Demographic and clinical variables were collected, including pain evaluation and analgesia in the first three days. Two groups were considered, Group A: standard analgesia; Group B: standard and epidural analgesia. Results: Thirty-nine postoperative admissions were analyzed (34 patients): Group A – 15; Group B – 24. Median age was 2.29 [0.46-13.17] years old with 60% male (Group A) and 6.19 [0.38-17] years old with 75% male (Group B). Median sum of pain intensity score was lower in Group B (1 vs 0.43; p 0.049) and less ketorolac and morphine doses were administered in Group B (2 vs 1, p 0.044; 2 vs 0, p 0.014). No important side effects were noted in either group. Epidural catheter was in place for a mean time of 50 hours. Length of stay was similar in both groups. Discussion: Better pain relief was achieved through epidural analgesia, carrying no associated complications, and allowing lower use of rescue medication. Results are similar to published literature, reinforcing that this type of analgesia should be explored as an alternative in children.Contexto: A dor no pós-operatório em crianças deve ser prevenida sempre que possível e tratada adequadamente. Os analgésicos são administrados maioritariamente por via endovenosa. A analgesia regional através de cateteres epidurais pode ser uma alternativa no controlo da dor e é ainda pouco utilizada. Objectivos: Comparar a analgesia regional através de cateteres epidurais versus a analgesia endovenosa standard isoladamente para controlo da dor no pós-operatório de doentes admitidos numa unidade de cuidados intensivos pediátricos. Métodos: Revisão retrospectiva dos processos de doentes admitidos após cirurgia genito-urinária de 2013 a 2017. Recolhidos os dados demográficos e as variáveis clínicas, incluindo avaliação da dor (usando as escalas numérica da dor e Wong Baker) e analgesia administrada nos primeiros três dias. A mediana da intensidade dos scores de dor (ISD) foi calculada nos primeiros 3 dias de pós-operatório. Considerados 2 grupos: Grupo A – analgesia standard; Grupo B – analgesia standard e analgesia epidural. A analgesia standard incluiu paracetamol q.i.d associado a AINEs e morfina PRN. Resultados: Foram analisadas 39 admissões pós-operatórias (34 doentes): Grupo A – 15; Grupo B – 24. A mediana de idades foi 2.29 [0.46-13.17] anos com 60% do sexo masculino (Grupo A) e 6.19 [0.38-17] com 7.5% do sexo masculino (Grupo B). A mediana da ISD foi mais baixa no grupo B (1 vs 0.43; p 0.049). Além disso, foi administrado menos cetorolac e menos morfina (2 vs 1, p 0.044; 2 vs 0, p 0.014) no grupo B. Não se registaram efeitos adversos importantes em nenhum dos grupos. Os cateteres epidurais ficaram colocados em média 50 horas. O tempo de internamento foi semelhante em ambos os grupos. Conclusão: O controlo da dor no pós-operatório de cirurgias genito-urinárias foi melhor com a analgesia epidural, permitindo uma menor utilização de terapêutica de resgate, sem complicações associadas. A analgesia epidural parece ser um método seguro e eficaz neste grupo etário.Sociedade Portuguesa de Pediatria2020-10-14info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://doi.org/10.25754/pjp.2020.19401eng2184-44532184-3333Borges, CatarinaCoelho, RitaAbadesso,, ClaraMoniz, MartaEscobar, CarlosNunes, PedroAlmeida, Helenainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-05-06T15:12:26Zoai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/19401Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openairemluisa.alvim@gmail.comopendoar:71602024-05-06T15:12:26Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Epidural Analgesia for Better Pain Control After Surgery in Children
Analgesia epidural para melhor controlo da dor no pós-operatório em Pediatria
title Epidural Analgesia for Better Pain Control After Surgery in Children
spellingShingle Epidural Analgesia for Better Pain Control After Surgery in Children
Epidural Analgesia for Better Pain Control After Surgery in Children
Borges, Catarina
Original articles
Borges, Catarina
Original articles
title_short Epidural Analgesia for Better Pain Control After Surgery in Children
title_full Epidural Analgesia for Better Pain Control After Surgery in Children
title_fullStr Epidural Analgesia for Better Pain Control After Surgery in Children
Epidural Analgesia for Better Pain Control After Surgery in Children
title_full_unstemmed Epidural Analgesia for Better Pain Control After Surgery in Children
Epidural Analgesia for Better Pain Control After Surgery in Children
title_sort Epidural Analgesia for Better Pain Control After Surgery in Children
author Borges, Catarina
author_facet Borges, Catarina
Borges, Catarina
Coelho, Rita
Abadesso,, Clara
Moniz, Marta
Escobar, Carlos
Nunes, Pedro
Almeida, Helena
Coelho, Rita
Abadesso,, Clara
Moniz, Marta
Escobar, Carlos
Nunes, Pedro
Almeida, Helena
author_role author
author2 Coelho, Rita
Abadesso,, Clara
Moniz, Marta
Escobar, Carlos
Nunes, Pedro
Almeida, Helena
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Borges, Catarina
Coelho, Rita
Abadesso,, Clara
Moniz, Marta
Escobar, Carlos
Nunes, Pedro
Almeida, Helena
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Original articles
topic Original articles
description Introduction: Postoperative pain in children is sometimes inadequately prevented and treated. Analgesics are mainly administered through intravenous route yet regional analgesia can also be used. The purpose of this study is to better understand the effects of combining epidural with standard analgesia in achieving postoperative pain relief. Methods: Retrospective chart review of postoperative pediatric patients, following genito-urinary surgery, admitted to an acute care pediatric unit during a 5 year period. Demographic and clinical variables were collected, including pain evaluation and analgesia in the first three days. Two groups were considered, Group A: standard analgesia; Group B: standard and epidural analgesia. Results: Thirty-nine postoperative admissions were analyzed (34 patients): Group A – 15; Group B – 24. Median age was 2.29 [0.46-13.17] years old with 60% male (Group A) and 6.19 [0.38-17] years old with 75% male (Group B). Median sum of pain intensity score was lower in Group B (1 vs 0.43; p 0.049) and less ketorolac and morphine doses were administered in Group B (2 vs 1, p 0.044; 2 vs 0, p 0.014). No important side effects were noted in either group. Epidural catheter was in place for a mean time of 50 hours. Length of stay was similar in both groups. Discussion: Better pain relief was achieved through epidural analgesia, carrying no associated complications, and allowing lower use of rescue medication. Results are similar to published literature, reinforcing that this type of analgesia should be explored as an alternative in children.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-10-14
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.25754/pjp.2020.19401
url https://doi.org/10.25754/pjp.2020.19401
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2184-4453
2184-3333
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Pediatria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Pediatria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mluisa.alvim@gmail.com
_version_ 1822181886647074816
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.25754/pjp.2020.19401