What Is (Fake) News? Analyzing News Values (and More) in Fake Stories
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i1.3331 |
Resumo: | ‘Fake news’ has been a topic of controversy during and following the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Much of the scholarship on it to date has focused on the ‘fakeness’ of fake news, illuminating the kinds of deception involved and the motivations of those who deceive. This study looks at the ‘newsness’ of fake news by examining the extent to which it imitates the characteristics and conventions of traditional journalism. Through a content analysis of 886 fake news articles, we find that in terms of news values, topic, and formats, articles published by fake news sites look very much like traditional—and real—news. Most of their articles included the news values of timeliness, negativity, and prominence; were about government and politics; and were written in an inverted pyramid format. However, one point of departure is in terms of objectivity, operationalized as the absence of the author’s personal opinion. The analysis found that the majority of articles analyzed included the opinion of their author or authors. |
id |
RCAP_9244758675a87e0b35aa2f643656fda4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3331 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
What Is (Fake) News? Analyzing News Values (and More) in Fake Storiescontent analysis; disinformation; fake news; inverted pyramid; news values; objectivity; traditional news‘Fake news’ has been a topic of controversy during and following the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Much of the scholarship on it to date has focused on the ‘fakeness’ of fake news, illuminating the kinds of deception involved and the motivations of those who deceive. This study looks at the ‘newsness’ of fake news by examining the extent to which it imitates the characteristics and conventions of traditional journalism. Through a content analysis of 886 fake news articles, we find that in terms of news values, topic, and formats, articles published by fake news sites look very much like traditional—and real—news. Most of their articles included the news values of timeliness, negativity, and prominence; were about government and politics; and were written in an inverted pyramid format. However, one point of departure is in terms of objectivity, operationalized as the absence of the author’s personal opinion. The analysis found that the majority of articles analyzed included the opinion of their author or authors.Cogitatio2021-02-03info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i1.3331oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3331Media and Communication; Vol 9, No 1 (2021): Dark Participation in Online Communication: The World of the Wicked Web; 110-1192183-2439reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/3331https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i1.3331https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/3331/3331Copyright (c) 2021 Edson C. Tandoc Jr., Ryan J. Thomas, Lauren Bishophttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTandoc Jr., Edson C.Thomas, Ryan J.Bishop, Lauren2022-12-20T10:57:38Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3331Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:20:19.375684Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
What Is (Fake) News? Analyzing News Values (and More) in Fake Stories |
title |
What Is (Fake) News? Analyzing News Values (and More) in Fake Stories |
spellingShingle |
What Is (Fake) News? Analyzing News Values (and More) in Fake Stories Tandoc Jr., Edson C. content analysis; disinformation; fake news; inverted pyramid; news values; objectivity; traditional news |
title_short |
What Is (Fake) News? Analyzing News Values (and More) in Fake Stories |
title_full |
What Is (Fake) News? Analyzing News Values (and More) in Fake Stories |
title_fullStr |
What Is (Fake) News? Analyzing News Values (and More) in Fake Stories |
title_full_unstemmed |
What Is (Fake) News? Analyzing News Values (and More) in Fake Stories |
title_sort |
What Is (Fake) News? Analyzing News Values (and More) in Fake Stories |
author |
Tandoc Jr., Edson C. |
author_facet |
Tandoc Jr., Edson C. Thomas, Ryan J. Bishop, Lauren |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Thomas, Ryan J. Bishop, Lauren |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Tandoc Jr., Edson C. Thomas, Ryan J. Bishop, Lauren |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
content analysis; disinformation; fake news; inverted pyramid; news values; objectivity; traditional news |
topic |
content analysis; disinformation; fake news; inverted pyramid; news values; objectivity; traditional news |
description |
‘Fake news’ has been a topic of controversy during and following the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Much of the scholarship on it to date has focused on the ‘fakeness’ of fake news, illuminating the kinds of deception involved and the motivations of those who deceive. This study looks at the ‘newsness’ of fake news by examining the extent to which it imitates the characteristics and conventions of traditional journalism. Through a content analysis of 886 fake news articles, we find that in terms of news values, topic, and formats, articles published by fake news sites look very much like traditional—and real—news. Most of their articles included the news values of timeliness, negativity, and prominence; were about government and politics; and were written in an inverted pyramid format. However, one point of departure is in terms of objectivity, operationalized as the absence of the author’s personal opinion. The analysis found that the majority of articles analyzed included the opinion of their author or authors. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-02-03 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i1.3331 oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3331 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i1.3331 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3331 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/3331 https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i1.3331 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/3331/3331 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Edson C. Tandoc Jr., Ryan J. Thomas, Lauren Bishop http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Edson C. Tandoc Jr., Ryan J. Thomas, Lauren Bishop http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Media and Communication; Vol 9, No 1 (2021): Dark Participation in Online Communication: The World of the Wicked Web; 110-119 2183-2439 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130651812691968 |