What Is (Fake) News? Analyzing News Values (and More) in Fake Stories

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Tandoc Jr., Edson C.
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Thomas, Ryan J., Bishop, Lauren
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i1.3331
Resumo: ‘Fake news’ has been a topic of controversy during and following the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Much of the scholarship on it to date has focused on the ‘fakeness’ of fake news, illuminating the kinds of deception involved and the motivations of those who deceive. This study looks at the ‘newsness’ of fake news by examining the extent to which it imitates the characteristics and conventions of traditional journalism. Through a content analysis of 886 fake news articles, we find that in terms of news values, topic, and formats, articles published by fake news sites look very much like traditional—and real—news. Most of their articles included the news values of timeliness, negativity, and prominence; were about government and politics; and were written in an inverted pyramid format. However, one point of departure is in terms of objectivity, operationalized as the absence of the author’s personal opinion. The analysis found that the majority of articles analyzed included the opinion of their author or authors.
id RCAP_9244758675a87e0b35aa2f643656fda4
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3331
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling What Is (Fake) News? Analyzing News Values (and More) in Fake Storiescontent analysis; disinformation; fake news; inverted pyramid; news values; objectivity; traditional news‘Fake news’ has been a topic of controversy during and following the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Much of the scholarship on it to date has focused on the ‘fakeness’ of fake news, illuminating the kinds of deception involved and the motivations of those who deceive. This study looks at the ‘newsness’ of fake news by examining the extent to which it imitates the characteristics and conventions of traditional journalism. Through a content analysis of 886 fake news articles, we find that in terms of news values, topic, and formats, articles published by fake news sites look very much like traditional—and real—news. Most of their articles included the news values of timeliness, negativity, and prominence; were about government and politics; and were written in an inverted pyramid format. However, one point of departure is in terms of objectivity, operationalized as the absence of the author’s personal opinion. The analysis found that the majority of articles analyzed included the opinion of their author or authors.Cogitatio2021-02-03info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i1.3331oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3331Media and Communication; Vol 9, No 1 (2021): Dark Participation in Online Communication: The World of the Wicked Web; 110-1192183-2439reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/3331https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i1.3331https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/3331/3331Copyright (c) 2021 Edson C. Tandoc Jr., Ryan J. Thomas, Lauren Bishophttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTandoc Jr., Edson C.Thomas, Ryan J.Bishop, Lauren2022-12-20T10:57:38Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3331Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:20:19.375684Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv What Is (Fake) News? Analyzing News Values (and More) in Fake Stories
title What Is (Fake) News? Analyzing News Values (and More) in Fake Stories
spellingShingle What Is (Fake) News? Analyzing News Values (and More) in Fake Stories
Tandoc Jr., Edson C.
content analysis; disinformation; fake news; inverted pyramid; news values; objectivity; traditional news
title_short What Is (Fake) News? Analyzing News Values (and More) in Fake Stories
title_full What Is (Fake) News? Analyzing News Values (and More) in Fake Stories
title_fullStr What Is (Fake) News? Analyzing News Values (and More) in Fake Stories
title_full_unstemmed What Is (Fake) News? Analyzing News Values (and More) in Fake Stories
title_sort What Is (Fake) News? Analyzing News Values (and More) in Fake Stories
author Tandoc Jr., Edson C.
author_facet Tandoc Jr., Edson C.
Thomas, Ryan J.
Bishop, Lauren
author_role author
author2 Thomas, Ryan J.
Bishop, Lauren
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Tandoc Jr., Edson C.
Thomas, Ryan J.
Bishop, Lauren
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv content analysis; disinformation; fake news; inverted pyramid; news values; objectivity; traditional news
topic content analysis; disinformation; fake news; inverted pyramid; news values; objectivity; traditional news
description ‘Fake news’ has been a topic of controversy during and following the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Much of the scholarship on it to date has focused on the ‘fakeness’ of fake news, illuminating the kinds of deception involved and the motivations of those who deceive. This study looks at the ‘newsness’ of fake news by examining the extent to which it imitates the characteristics and conventions of traditional journalism. Through a content analysis of 886 fake news articles, we find that in terms of news values, topic, and formats, articles published by fake news sites look very much like traditional—and real—news. Most of their articles included the news values of timeliness, negativity, and prominence; were about government and politics; and were written in an inverted pyramid format. However, one point of departure is in terms of objectivity, operationalized as the absence of the author’s personal opinion. The analysis found that the majority of articles analyzed included the opinion of their author or authors.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-02-03
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i1.3331
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3331
url https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i1.3331
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3331
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/3331
https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i1.3331
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/3331/3331
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Edson C. Tandoc Jr., Ryan J. Thomas, Lauren Bishop
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Edson C. Tandoc Jr., Ryan J. Thomas, Lauren Bishop
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Media and Communication; Vol 9, No 1 (2021): Dark Participation in Online Communication: The World of the Wicked Web; 110-119
2183-2439
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130651812691968