Scrutinizing Virtual Citizen Involvement in Planning: Ten Applications of an Online Participatory Tool

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Hjerpe, Mattias
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Glaas, Erik, Storbjörk, Sofie
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v6i3.1481
Resumo: How to organize citizen participation in planning is continuously debated. The amount of Online Participatory Tools (OPTs) to facilitate inclusive and efficient participation has increased. While studies have assessed their functionality, usability and effectiveness in planning, they have rarely analyzed OPTs beyond single-cases, targeted tools that are widely used or assessed how OPTs affect broader values of participation. Targeting this absence, this study analyzes how ten applications of a widely used OPT, CityPlanner™, affect the normative, substantive and instrumental values of citizen participatory planning in Swedish cities. By analyzing 1,354 citizen proposals and interviewing urban planners, we find that citizens more extensively submit proposals and initiate debates on planning when using the OPT. Results suggest a more even age and gender distribution among proposal users than with conventional methods, facilitating normative values of participation. The OPT was generally applied early in planning and generated high-quality inputs. Our results, however, nuance previous analyses by also emphasizing the importance of place-specificity of OPT applications and of joint participation strategies among departments. Key for OPT development includes the need to improve their ability to analyze overarching trends among inputs.
id RCAP_93aee8f00227e2eb7a342b14402843be
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1481
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Scrutinizing Virtual Citizen Involvement in Planning: Ten Applications of an Online Participatory Toolcitizen participation; governance; online participatory tools; planning; visualizationHow to organize citizen participation in planning is continuously debated. The amount of Online Participatory Tools (OPTs) to facilitate inclusive and efficient participation has increased. While studies have assessed their functionality, usability and effectiveness in planning, they have rarely analyzed OPTs beyond single-cases, targeted tools that are widely used or assessed how OPTs affect broader values of participation. Targeting this absence, this study analyzes how ten applications of a widely used OPT, CityPlanner™, affect the normative, substantive and instrumental values of citizen participatory planning in Swedish cities. By analyzing 1,354 citizen proposals and interviewing urban planners, we find that citizens more extensively submit proposals and initiate debates on planning when using the OPT. Results suggest a more even age and gender distribution among proposal users than with conventional methods, facilitating normative values of participation. The OPT was generally applied early in planning and generated high-quality inputs. Our results, however, nuance previous analyses by also emphasizing the importance of place-specificity of OPT applications and of joint participation strategies among departments. Key for OPT development includes the need to improve their ability to analyze overarching trends among inputs.Cogitatio2018-09-28info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v6i3.1481oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1481Politics and Governance; Vol 6, No 3 (2018): Multidisciplinary Studies in Politics and Governance; 159-1692183-2463reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/1481https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v6i3.1481https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/1481/1481https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/downloadSuppFile/1481/345Copyright (c) 2018 Mattias Hjerpe, Erik Glaas, Sofie Storbjörkhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHjerpe, MattiasGlaas, ErikStorbjörk, Sofie2022-12-22T15:16:02Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1481Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:22:15.255851Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Scrutinizing Virtual Citizen Involvement in Planning: Ten Applications of an Online Participatory Tool
title Scrutinizing Virtual Citizen Involvement in Planning: Ten Applications of an Online Participatory Tool
spellingShingle Scrutinizing Virtual Citizen Involvement in Planning: Ten Applications of an Online Participatory Tool
Hjerpe, Mattias
citizen participation; governance; online participatory tools; planning; visualization
title_short Scrutinizing Virtual Citizen Involvement in Planning: Ten Applications of an Online Participatory Tool
title_full Scrutinizing Virtual Citizen Involvement in Planning: Ten Applications of an Online Participatory Tool
title_fullStr Scrutinizing Virtual Citizen Involvement in Planning: Ten Applications of an Online Participatory Tool
title_full_unstemmed Scrutinizing Virtual Citizen Involvement in Planning: Ten Applications of an Online Participatory Tool
title_sort Scrutinizing Virtual Citizen Involvement in Planning: Ten Applications of an Online Participatory Tool
author Hjerpe, Mattias
author_facet Hjerpe, Mattias
Glaas, Erik
Storbjörk, Sofie
author_role author
author2 Glaas, Erik
Storbjörk, Sofie
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Hjerpe, Mattias
Glaas, Erik
Storbjörk, Sofie
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv citizen participation; governance; online participatory tools; planning; visualization
topic citizen participation; governance; online participatory tools; planning; visualization
description How to organize citizen participation in planning is continuously debated. The amount of Online Participatory Tools (OPTs) to facilitate inclusive and efficient participation has increased. While studies have assessed their functionality, usability and effectiveness in planning, they have rarely analyzed OPTs beyond single-cases, targeted tools that are widely used or assessed how OPTs affect broader values of participation. Targeting this absence, this study analyzes how ten applications of a widely used OPT, CityPlanner™, affect the normative, substantive and instrumental values of citizen participatory planning in Swedish cities. By analyzing 1,354 citizen proposals and interviewing urban planners, we find that citizens more extensively submit proposals and initiate debates on planning when using the OPT. Results suggest a more even age and gender distribution among proposal users than with conventional methods, facilitating normative values of participation. The OPT was generally applied early in planning and generated high-quality inputs. Our results, however, nuance previous analyses by also emphasizing the importance of place-specificity of OPT applications and of joint participation strategies among departments. Key for OPT development includes the need to improve their ability to analyze overarching trends among inputs.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-09-28
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v6i3.1481
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1481
url https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v6i3.1481
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1481
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/1481
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v6i3.1481
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/1481/1481
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/downloadSuppFile/1481/345
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Mattias Hjerpe, Erik Glaas, Sofie Storbjörk
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Mattias Hjerpe, Erik Glaas, Sofie Storbjörk
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Politics and Governance; Vol 6, No 3 (2018): Multidisciplinary Studies in Politics and Governance; 159-169
2183-2463
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130668686376960