The role of electronic cigarettes in smoking cessation: an evidence-based review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
DOI: | 10.32385/rpmgf.v31i3.11525 |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v31i3.11525 |
Resumo: | Objectives: To determine if electronic cigarettes are effective in smoking cessation. Data sources: MEDLINE databases; National Clearinghouse; Canadian Medical Association Practice Guidelines InfoBase; Guidelines Finder of the National Electronic Library for Health in the British NHS; Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness – Centre for Reviews and Dissemination; Bandolier; The Cochrane Library; Index of Portuguese Medical Journals. Review methods: Articles published between 01/07/2004 and 30/06/2014 using the MeSH term ‘smoking cessation’, the English terms ‘electronic cigarette(s)’, ‘e-cigarette(s)’, ‘e-cig(s)’ and the Portuguese terms ‘cessação tabágica’ and ‘cigarro(s) ele(c)trónico(s)’. Studies that evaluated the smoking cessation in smokers exposed and not exposed to electronic cigarettes were included. ‘Strength-of-Recommendation Taxonomy’, ‘Jadad’ and ‘Newcastle-Ottawa’ scales were used to assess the quality of the studies and the strength of recommendations. Results: The search produced a list of 2,076 articles. Ten articles were excluded as duplicates, 2,005 were excluded after reading the title because they were not directly related to the topic, 47 were excluded after reading the summary, and 11 after reading the full text because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. Three articles were included in this review. They were a systematic review, which included nine original studies [Level of Evidence (LE) 2], a classic review (LE 3), whose conclusions were unfavorable to the use of electronic cigarettes, and one cross-sectional study, which showed an increased use of electronic cigarettes compared to other therapies among those who stopped smoking (LE 3). Conclusions: Most studies found no association between use of electronic cigarettes and smoking cessation. The authors concluded that its use does not seem to play a beneficial role in smoking cessation (Strength of Recommendation B). Given the rapid expansion and growing popularity of these products, better quality studies are needed. |
id |
RCAP_93f1f6e3425734e3a5dd6e6daed22ba7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.rpmgf.pt:article/11525 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
The role of electronic cigarettes in smoking cessation: an evidence-based reviewPapel do cigarro eletrónico na cessação tabágica: uma revisão baseada na evidênciaElectronic CigaretteSmoking CessationCigarro EletrónicoCessação TabágicaObjectives: To determine if electronic cigarettes are effective in smoking cessation. Data sources: MEDLINE databases; National Clearinghouse; Canadian Medical Association Practice Guidelines InfoBase; Guidelines Finder of the National Electronic Library for Health in the British NHS; Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness – Centre for Reviews and Dissemination; Bandolier; The Cochrane Library; Index of Portuguese Medical Journals. Review methods: Articles published between 01/07/2004 and 30/06/2014 using the MeSH term ‘smoking cessation’, the English terms ‘electronic cigarette(s)’, ‘e-cigarette(s)’, ‘e-cig(s)’ and the Portuguese terms ‘cessação tabágica’ and ‘cigarro(s) ele(c)trónico(s)’. Studies that evaluated the smoking cessation in smokers exposed and not exposed to electronic cigarettes were included. ‘Strength-of-Recommendation Taxonomy’, ‘Jadad’ and ‘Newcastle-Ottawa’ scales were used to assess the quality of the studies and the strength of recommendations. Results: The search produced a list of 2,076 articles. Ten articles were excluded as duplicates, 2,005 were excluded after reading the title because they were not directly related to the topic, 47 were excluded after reading the summary, and 11 after reading the full text because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. Three articles were included in this review. They were a systematic review, which included nine original studies [Level of Evidence (LE) 2], a classic review (LE 3), whose conclusions were unfavorable to the use of electronic cigarettes, and one cross-sectional study, which showed an increased use of electronic cigarettes compared to other therapies among those who stopped smoking (LE 3). Conclusions: Most studies found no association between use of electronic cigarettes and smoking cessation. The authors concluded that its use does not seem to play a beneficial role in smoking cessation (Strength of Recommendation B). Given the rapid expansion and growing popularity of these products, better quality studies are needed.Objetivos: Determinar se a utilização de cigarros eletrónicos (CE) constitui uma alternativa no apoio à cessação tabágica (CT). Fontes de dados: Bases de dados MEDLINE; National Clearinghouse; Canadian Medical Association Practice Guidelines InfoBase; Guidelines Finder da National Electronic Library for Health do NHS britânico; Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness – Centre for Reviews and Dissemination; Bandolier; The Cochrane Library; Índex de Revistas Médicas Portuguesas. Métodos de revisão: Pesquisa de artigos publicados entre 01/07/2004 e 30/06/2014, utilizando o termo MeSH smoking cessation, os termos electronic cigarette(s), e-cigarette(s), e-cig(s) e em português “cessação tabágica” e “cigarro(s) ele(c)trónico(s)”. Foram incluídos estudos que avaliassem a CT em fumadores expostos e não expostos ao CE. As escalas Strength-of-Recommendation Taxonomy, Jadad e Newcastle-Ottawa foram utilizadas para avaliar a qualidade dos estudos e a força de recomendação. Resultados: Da pesquisa resultaram 2.076 artigos; 10 foram excluídos por serem repetidos, 2.005 após leitura do título por não estarem relacionados diretamente com o tema, 47 após leitura do resumo e 11 após leitura integral por não satisfazerem os critérios de inclusão. Foram assim incluídos três artigos: uma revisão sistemática que incluiu nove estudos originais [Nível de Evidência (NE) 2]; uma revisão clássica (NE 3), cujas conclusões foram desfavoráveis à utilização dos CE; e um estudo transversal que mostrou uma maior utilização de CE em relação a outras terapêuticas entre aqueles que atingiram CT (NE 3). Conclusões: A maioria dos trabalhos não encontrou associação entre o uso de CE e a CT. Os autores consideram que o seu uso não parece desempenhar um papel benéfico na CT (Força de Recomendação B). Dada a rápida expansão e crescente popularidade destes produtos, são necessários estudos de melhor qualidade.Associação Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar2015-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v31i3.11525https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v31i3.11525Portuguese Journal of Family Medicine and General Practice; Vol. 31 No. 3 (2015): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 198-204Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 31 Núm. 3 (2015): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 198-204Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 31 N.º 3 (2015): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 198-2042182-51812182-517310.32385/rpmgf.v31i3reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/11525https://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/11525/11198Couto, PedroMendes, PedroBarreira, RosaSilva, Joana de Oliveira eSilva, LígiaAlmeida, Elisabeteinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-17T11:59:52Zoai:ojs.rpmgf.pt:article/11525Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openairemluisa.alvim@gmail.comopendoar:71602024-09-17T11:59:52Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The role of electronic cigarettes in smoking cessation: an evidence-based review Papel do cigarro eletrónico na cessação tabágica: uma revisão baseada na evidência |
title |
The role of electronic cigarettes in smoking cessation: an evidence-based review |
spellingShingle |
The role of electronic cigarettes in smoking cessation: an evidence-based review The role of electronic cigarettes in smoking cessation: an evidence-based review Couto, Pedro Electronic Cigarette Smoking Cessation Cigarro Eletrónico Cessação Tabágica Couto, Pedro Electronic Cigarette Smoking Cessation Cigarro Eletrónico Cessação Tabágica |
title_short |
The role of electronic cigarettes in smoking cessation: an evidence-based review |
title_full |
The role of electronic cigarettes in smoking cessation: an evidence-based review |
title_fullStr |
The role of electronic cigarettes in smoking cessation: an evidence-based review The role of electronic cigarettes in smoking cessation: an evidence-based review |
title_full_unstemmed |
The role of electronic cigarettes in smoking cessation: an evidence-based review The role of electronic cigarettes in smoking cessation: an evidence-based review |
title_sort |
The role of electronic cigarettes in smoking cessation: an evidence-based review |
author |
Couto, Pedro |
author_facet |
Couto, Pedro Couto, Pedro Mendes, Pedro Barreira, Rosa Silva, Joana de Oliveira e Silva, Lígia Almeida, Elisabete Mendes, Pedro Barreira, Rosa Silva, Joana de Oliveira e Silva, Lígia Almeida, Elisabete |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mendes, Pedro Barreira, Rosa Silva, Joana de Oliveira e Silva, Lígia Almeida, Elisabete |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Couto, Pedro Mendes, Pedro Barreira, Rosa Silva, Joana de Oliveira e Silva, Lígia Almeida, Elisabete |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Electronic Cigarette Smoking Cessation Cigarro Eletrónico Cessação Tabágica |
topic |
Electronic Cigarette Smoking Cessation Cigarro Eletrónico Cessação Tabágica |
description |
Objectives: To determine if electronic cigarettes are effective in smoking cessation. Data sources: MEDLINE databases; National Clearinghouse; Canadian Medical Association Practice Guidelines InfoBase; Guidelines Finder of the National Electronic Library for Health in the British NHS; Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness – Centre for Reviews and Dissemination; Bandolier; The Cochrane Library; Index of Portuguese Medical Journals. Review methods: Articles published between 01/07/2004 and 30/06/2014 using the MeSH term ‘smoking cessation’, the English terms ‘electronic cigarette(s)’, ‘e-cigarette(s)’, ‘e-cig(s)’ and the Portuguese terms ‘cessação tabágica’ and ‘cigarro(s) ele(c)trónico(s)’. Studies that evaluated the smoking cessation in smokers exposed and not exposed to electronic cigarettes were included. ‘Strength-of-Recommendation Taxonomy’, ‘Jadad’ and ‘Newcastle-Ottawa’ scales were used to assess the quality of the studies and the strength of recommendations. Results: The search produced a list of 2,076 articles. Ten articles were excluded as duplicates, 2,005 were excluded after reading the title because they were not directly related to the topic, 47 were excluded after reading the summary, and 11 after reading the full text because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. Three articles were included in this review. They were a systematic review, which included nine original studies [Level of Evidence (LE) 2], a classic review (LE 3), whose conclusions were unfavorable to the use of electronic cigarettes, and one cross-sectional study, which showed an increased use of electronic cigarettes compared to other therapies among those who stopped smoking (LE 3). Conclusions: Most studies found no association between use of electronic cigarettes and smoking cessation. The authors concluded that its use does not seem to play a beneficial role in smoking cessation (Strength of Recommendation B). Given the rapid expansion and growing popularity of these products, better quality studies are needed. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-05-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v31i3.11525 https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v31i3.11525 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v31i3.11525 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/11525 https://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/11525/11198 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Portuguese Journal of Family Medicine and General Practice; Vol. 31 No. 3 (2015): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 198-204 Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 31 Núm. 3 (2015): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 198-204 Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 31 N.º 3 (2015): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 198-204 2182-5181 2182-5173 10.32385/rpmgf.v31i3 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mluisa.alvim@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1822181851534458880 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.32385/rpmgf.v31i3.11525 |