The role of electronic cigarettes in smoking cessation: an evidence-based review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Couto, Pedro
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Mendes, Pedro, Barreira, Rosa, Silva, Joana de Oliveira e, Silva, Lígia, Almeida, Elisabete
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
DOI: 10.32385/rpmgf.v31i3.11525
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v31i3.11525
Resumo: Objectives: To determine if electronic cigarettes are effective in smoking cessation. Data sources: MEDLINE databases; National Clearinghouse; Canadian Medical Association Practice Guidelines InfoBase; Guidelines Finder of the National Electronic Library for Health in the British NHS; Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness – Centre for Reviews and Dissemination; Bandolier; The Cochrane Library; Index of Portuguese Medical Journals. Review methods: Articles published between 01/07/2004 and 30/06/2014 using the MeSH term ‘smoking cessation’, the English terms ‘electronic cigarette(s)’, ‘e-cigarette(s)’, ‘e-cig(s)’ and the Portuguese terms ‘cessação tabágica’ and ‘cigarro(s) ele(c)trónico(s)’. Studies that evaluated the smoking cessation in smokers exposed and not exposed to electronic cigarettes were included. ‘Strength-of-Recommendation Taxonomy’, ‘Jadad’ and ‘Newcastle-Ottawa’ scales were used to assess the quality of the studies and the strength of recommendations. Results: The search produced a list of 2,076 articles. Ten articles were excluded as duplicates, 2,005 were excluded after reading the title because they were not directly related to the topic, 47 were excluded after reading the summary, and 11 after reading the full text because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. Three articles were included in this review. They were a systematic review, which included nine original studies [Level of Evidence (LE) 2], a classic review (LE 3), whose conclusions were unfavorable to the use of electronic cigarettes, and one cross-sectional study, which showed an increased use of electronic cigarettes compared to other therapies among those who stopped smoking (LE 3). Conclusions: Most studies found no association between use of electronic cigarettes and smoking cessation. The authors concluded that its use does not seem to play a beneficial role in smoking cessation (Strength of Recommendation B). Given the rapid expansion and growing popularity of these products, better quality studies are needed.
id RCAP_93f1f6e3425734e3a5dd6e6daed22ba7
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.rpmgf.pt:article/11525
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling The role of electronic cigarettes in smoking cessation: an evidence-based reviewPapel do cigarro eletrónico na cessação tabágica: uma revisão baseada na evidênciaElectronic CigaretteSmoking CessationCigarro EletrónicoCessação TabágicaObjectives: To determine if electronic cigarettes are effective in smoking cessation. Data sources: MEDLINE databases; National Clearinghouse; Canadian Medical Association Practice Guidelines InfoBase; Guidelines Finder of the National Electronic Library for Health in the British NHS; Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness – Centre for Reviews and Dissemination; Bandolier; The Cochrane Library; Index of Portuguese Medical Journals. Review methods: Articles published between 01/07/2004 and 30/06/2014 using the MeSH term ‘smoking cessation’, the English terms ‘electronic cigarette(s)’, ‘e-cigarette(s)’, ‘e-cig(s)’ and the Portuguese terms ‘cessação tabágica’ and ‘cigarro(s) ele(c)trónico(s)’. Studies that evaluated the smoking cessation in smokers exposed and not exposed to electronic cigarettes were included. ‘Strength-of-Recommendation Taxonomy’, ‘Jadad’ and ‘Newcastle-Ottawa’ scales were used to assess the quality of the studies and the strength of recommendations. Results: The search produced a list of 2,076 articles. Ten articles were excluded as duplicates, 2,005 were excluded after reading the title because they were not directly related to the topic, 47 were excluded after reading the summary, and 11 after reading the full text because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. Three articles were included in this review. They were a systematic review, which included nine original studies [Level of Evidence (LE) 2], a classic review (LE 3), whose conclusions were unfavorable to the use of electronic cigarettes, and one cross-sectional study, which showed an increased use of electronic cigarettes compared to other therapies among those who stopped smoking (LE 3). Conclusions: Most studies found no association between use of electronic cigarettes and smoking cessation. The authors concluded that its use does not seem to play a beneficial role in smoking cessation (Strength of Recommendation B). Given the rapid expansion and growing popularity of these products, better quality studies are needed.Objetivos: Determinar se a utilização de cigarros eletrónicos (CE) constitui uma alternativa no apoio à cessação tabágica (CT). Fontes de dados: Bases de dados MEDLINE; National Clearinghouse; Canadian Medical Association Practice Guidelines InfoBase; Guidelines Finder da National Electronic Library for Health do NHS britânico; Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness – Centre for Reviews and Dissemination; Bandolier; The Cochrane Library; Índex de Revistas Médicas Portuguesas. Métodos de revisão: Pesquisa de artigos publicados entre 01/07/2004 e 30/06/2014, utilizando o termo MeSH smoking cessation, os termos electronic cigarette(s), e-cigarette(s), e-cig(s) e em português “cessação tabágica” e “cigarro(s) ele(c)trónico(s)”. Foram incluídos estudos que avaliassem a CT em fumadores expostos e não expostos ao CE. As escalas Strength-of-Recommendation Taxonomy, Jadad e Newcastle-Ottawa foram utilizadas para avaliar a qualidade dos estudos e a força de recomendação. Resultados: Da pesquisa resultaram 2.076 artigos; 10 foram excluídos por serem repetidos, 2.005 após leitura do título por não estarem relacionados diretamente com o tema, 47 após leitura do resumo e 11 após leitura integral por não satisfazerem os critérios de inclusão. Foram assim incluídos três artigos: uma revisão sistemática que incluiu nove estudos originais [Nível de Evidência (NE) 2]; uma revisão clássica (NE 3), cujas conclusões foram desfavoráveis à utilização dos CE; e um estudo transversal que mostrou uma maior utilização de CE em relação a outras terapêuticas entre aqueles que atingiram CT (NE 3). Conclusões: A maioria dos trabalhos não encontrou associação entre o uso de CE e a CT. Os autores consideram que o seu uso não parece desempenhar um papel benéfico na CT (Força de Recomendação B). Dada a rápida expansão e crescente popularidade destes produtos, são necessários estudos de melhor qualidade.Associação Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar2015-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v31i3.11525https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v31i3.11525Portuguese Journal of Family Medicine and General Practice; Vol. 31 No. 3 (2015): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 198-204Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 31 Núm. 3 (2015): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 198-204Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 31 N.º 3 (2015): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 198-2042182-51812182-517310.32385/rpmgf.v31i3reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/11525https://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/11525/11198Couto, PedroMendes, PedroBarreira, RosaSilva, Joana de Oliveira eSilva, LígiaAlmeida, Elisabeteinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-17T11:59:52Zoai:ojs.rpmgf.pt:article/11525Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openairemluisa.alvim@gmail.comopendoar:71602024-09-17T11:59:52Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The role of electronic cigarettes in smoking cessation: an evidence-based review
Papel do cigarro eletrónico na cessação tabágica: uma revisão baseada na evidência
title The role of electronic cigarettes in smoking cessation: an evidence-based review
spellingShingle The role of electronic cigarettes in smoking cessation: an evidence-based review
The role of electronic cigarettes in smoking cessation: an evidence-based review
Couto, Pedro
Electronic Cigarette
Smoking Cessation
Cigarro Eletrónico
Cessação Tabágica
Couto, Pedro
Electronic Cigarette
Smoking Cessation
Cigarro Eletrónico
Cessação Tabágica
title_short The role of electronic cigarettes in smoking cessation: an evidence-based review
title_full The role of electronic cigarettes in smoking cessation: an evidence-based review
title_fullStr The role of electronic cigarettes in smoking cessation: an evidence-based review
The role of electronic cigarettes in smoking cessation: an evidence-based review
title_full_unstemmed The role of electronic cigarettes in smoking cessation: an evidence-based review
The role of electronic cigarettes in smoking cessation: an evidence-based review
title_sort The role of electronic cigarettes in smoking cessation: an evidence-based review
author Couto, Pedro
author_facet Couto, Pedro
Couto, Pedro
Mendes, Pedro
Barreira, Rosa
Silva, Joana de Oliveira e
Silva, Lígia
Almeida, Elisabete
Mendes, Pedro
Barreira, Rosa
Silva, Joana de Oliveira e
Silva, Lígia
Almeida, Elisabete
author_role author
author2 Mendes, Pedro
Barreira, Rosa
Silva, Joana de Oliveira e
Silva, Lígia
Almeida, Elisabete
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Couto, Pedro
Mendes, Pedro
Barreira, Rosa
Silva, Joana de Oliveira e
Silva, Lígia
Almeida, Elisabete
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Electronic Cigarette
Smoking Cessation
Cigarro Eletrónico
Cessação Tabágica
topic Electronic Cigarette
Smoking Cessation
Cigarro Eletrónico
Cessação Tabágica
description Objectives: To determine if electronic cigarettes are effective in smoking cessation. Data sources: MEDLINE databases; National Clearinghouse; Canadian Medical Association Practice Guidelines InfoBase; Guidelines Finder of the National Electronic Library for Health in the British NHS; Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness – Centre for Reviews and Dissemination; Bandolier; The Cochrane Library; Index of Portuguese Medical Journals. Review methods: Articles published between 01/07/2004 and 30/06/2014 using the MeSH term ‘smoking cessation’, the English terms ‘electronic cigarette(s)’, ‘e-cigarette(s)’, ‘e-cig(s)’ and the Portuguese terms ‘cessação tabágica’ and ‘cigarro(s) ele(c)trónico(s)’. Studies that evaluated the smoking cessation in smokers exposed and not exposed to electronic cigarettes were included. ‘Strength-of-Recommendation Taxonomy’, ‘Jadad’ and ‘Newcastle-Ottawa’ scales were used to assess the quality of the studies and the strength of recommendations. Results: The search produced a list of 2,076 articles. Ten articles were excluded as duplicates, 2,005 were excluded after reading the title because they were not directly related to the topic, 47 were excluded after reading the summary, and 11 after reading the full text because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. Three articles were included in this review. They were a systematic review, which included nine original studies [Level of Evidence (LE) 2], a classic review (LE 3), whose conclusions were unfavorable to the use of electronic cigarettes, and one cross-sectional study, which showed an increased use of electronic cigarettes compared to other therapies among those who stopped smoking (LE 3). Conclusions: Most studies found no association between use of electronic cigarettes and smoking cessation. The authors concluded that its use does not seem to play a beneficial role in smoking cessation (Strength of Recommendation B). Given the rapid expansion and growing popularity of these products, better quality studies are needed.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-05-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v31i3.11525
https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v31i3.11525
url https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v31i3.11525
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/11525
https://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/11525/11198
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Portuguese Journal of Family Medicine and General Practice; Vol. 31 No. 3 (2015): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 198-204
Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 31 Núm. 3 (2015): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 198-204
Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 31 N.º 3 (2015): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 198-204
2182-5181
2182-5173
10.32385/rpmgf.v31i3
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mluisa.alvim@gmail.com
_version_ 1822181851534458880
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.32385/rpmgf.v31i3.11525