Critical Edge and Legitimation in Peace Studies

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pureza, José Manuel
Data de Publicação: 2009
Outros Autores: Cravo, Teresa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10316/36567
https://doi.org/10.4000/rccsar.77
Resumo: Historically established as critical knowledge and thus an alternative to normal science in International Relations, Peace Studies came to be co-opted, in the 1990s, by the regulatory structures of the international system as a cornerstone of many of the options put into practice especially in post-war reconstruction processes. In this context, recovering the critical lineage of Peace Studies today involves two radical options. The first entails qualifying intended peace as sustainable peace. The second implies the epistemological decolonisation of Peace Studies.
id RCAP_94f41688a969c4e0e8b425aaa894c849
oai_identifier_str oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/36567
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Critical Edge and Legitimation in Peace StudiesPeace studiesInternational relationsPostpositivismCritical theoryHistorically established as critical knowledge and thus an alternative to normal science in International Relations, Peace Studies came to be co-opted, in the 1990s, by the regulatory structures of the international system as a cornerstone of many of the options put into practice especially in post-war reconstruction processes. In this context, recovering the critical lineage of Peace Studies today involves two radical options. The first entails qualifying intended peace as sustainable peace. The second implies the epistemological decolonisation of Peace Studies.Centro de Estudos Sociais2009-09info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10316/36567http://hdl.handle.net/10316/36567https://doi.org/10.4000/rccsar.77https://doi.org/10.4000/rccsar.77eng1647-3175http://rccsar.revues.org/77Pureza, José ManuelCravo, Teresainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2021-06-29T10:03:46Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/36567Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:50:51.254335Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Critical Edge and Legitimation in Peace Studies
title Critical Edge and Legitimation in Peace Studies
spellingShingle Critical Edge and Legitimation in Peace Studies
Pureza, José Manuel
Peace studies
International relations
Postpositivism
Critical theory
title_short Critical Edge and Legitimation in Peace Studies
title_full Critical Edge and Legitimation in Peace Studies
title_fullStr Critical Edge and Legitimation in Peace Studies
title_full_unstemmed Critical Edge and Legitimation in Peace Studies
title_sort Critical Edge and Legitimation in Peace Studies
author Pureza, José Manuel
author_facet Pureza, José Manuel
Cravo, Teresa
author_role author
author2 Cravo, Teresa
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pureza, José Manuel
Cravo, Teresa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Peace studies
International relations
Postpositivism
Critical theory
topic Peace studies
International relations
Postpositivism
Critical theory
description Historically established as critical knowledge and thus an alternative to normal science in International Relations, Peace Studies came to be co-opted, in the 1990s, by the regulatory structures of the international system as a cornerstone of many of the options put into practice especially in post-war reconstruction processes. In this context, recovering the critical lineage of Peace Studies today involves two radical options. The first entails qualifying intended peace as sustainable peace. The second implies the epistemological decolonisation of Peace Studies.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-09
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10316/36567
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/36567
https://doi.org/10.4000/rccsar.77
https://doi.org/10.4000/rccsar.77
url http://hdl.handle.net/10316/36567
https://doi.org/10.4000/rccsar.77
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1647-3175
http://rccsar.revues.org/77
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro de Estudos Sociais
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro de Estudos Sociais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133788994797568

Registros relacionados