Key factors for effective implementation of healthcare workers support interventions after patient safety incidents in health organisations: a scoping review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Guerra-Paiva, S
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Lobão, MJ, Simões, DG, Fernandes, J, Donato, H, Carrillo, I, Mira, JJ, Sousa, P
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.4/2345
Resumo: Abstract Objectives: This study aims to map and frame the main factors present in support interventions successfully implemented in health organisations in order to provide timely and adequate response to healthcare workers (HCWs) after patient safety incidents (PSIs). Design: Scoping review guided by the six-stage approach proposed by Arksey and O'Malley and by PRISMA-ScR. Data sources: CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, Epistemonikos, PsycINFO, PubMed, SciELO Citation Index, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, reference lists of the eligible articles, websites and a consultation group. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: Empirical studies (original articles) were prioritised. We used the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool Version 2018 to conduct a quality assessment of the eligible studies. Data extraction and synthesis: A total of 9766 records were retrieved (last update in November 2022). We assessed 156 articles for eligibility in the full-text screening. Of these, 29 earticles met the eligibility criteria. The articles were independently screened by two authors. In the case of disagreement, a third author was involved. The collected data were organised according to the Organisational factors, People, Environment, Recommendations from other Audies, Attributes of the support interventions. We used EndNote to import articles from the databases and Rayyan to support the screening of titles and abstracts. Results: The existence of an organisational culture based on principles of trust and non-judgement, multidisciplinary action, leadership engagement and strong dissemination of the support programmes' were crucial factors for their effective implementation. Training should be provided for peer supporters and leaders to facilitate the response to HCWs' needs. Regular communication among the implementation team, allocation of protected time, funding and continuous monitoring are useful elements to the sustainability of the programmes. Conclusion: HCWs' well-being depends on an adequate implementation of a complex group of interrelated factors to support them after PSIs.
id RCAP_97e6435cb6fba198591e1f7edd2313ce
oai_identifier_str oai:rihuc.huc.min-saude.pt:10400.4/2345
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Key factors for effective implementation of healthcare workers support interventions after patient safety incidents in health organisations: a scoping reviewSaúde PúblicaSegurança do DoenteQualidade de Cuidados de SaúdeAbstract Objectives: This study aims to map and frame the main factors present in support interventions successfully implemented in health organisations in order to provide timely and adequate response to healthcare workers (HCWs) after patient safety incidents (PSIs). Design: Scoping review guided by the six-stage approach proposed by Arksey and O'Malley and by PRISMA-ScR. Data sources: CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, Epistemonikos, PsycINFO, PubMed, SciELO Citation Index, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, reference lists of the eligible articles, websites and a consultation group. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: Empirical studies (original articles) were prioritised. We used the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool Version 2018 to conduct a quality assessment of the eligible studies. Data extraction and synthesis: A total of 9766 records were retrieved (last update in November 2022). We assessed 156 articles for eligibility in the full-text screening. Of these, 29 earticles met the eligibility criteria. The articles were independently screened by two authors. In the case of disagreement, a third author was involved. The collected data were organised according to the Organisational factors, People, Environment, Recommendations from other Audies, Attributes of the support interventions. We used EndNote to import articles from the databases and Rayyan to support the screening of titles and abstracts. Results: The existence of an organisational culture based on principles of trust and non-judgement, multidisciplinary action, leadership engagement and strong dissemination of the support programmes' were crucial factors for their effective implementation. Training should be provided for peer supporters and leaders to facilitate the response to HCWs' needs. Regular communication among the implementation team, allocation of protected time, funding and continuous monitoring are useful elements to the sustainability of the programmes. Conclusion: HCWs' well-being depends on an adequate implementation of a complex group of interrelated factors to support them after PSIs.RIHUCGuerra-Paiva, SLobão, MJSimões, DGFernandes, JDonato, HCarrillo, IMira, JJSousa, P2024-01-08T14:37:15Z20232023-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.4/2345engBMJ Open . 2023 Dec 27;13(12):e078118.10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078118info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-11T03:53:18Zoai:rihuc.huc.min-saude.pt:10400.4/2345Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:35:51.134488Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Key factors for effective implementation of healthcare workers support interventions after patient safety incidents in health organisations: a scoping review
title Key factors for effective implementation of healthcare workers support interventions after patient safety incidents in health organisations: a scoping review
spellingShingle Key factors for effective implementation of healthcare workers support interventions after patient safety incidents in health organisations: a scoping review
Guerra-Paiva, S
Saúde Pública
Segurança do Doente
Qualidade de Cuidados de Saúde
title_short Key factors for effective implementation of healthcare workers support interventions after patient safety incidents in health organisations: a scoping review
title_full Key factors for effective implementation of healthcare workers support interventions after patient safety incidents in health organisations: a scoping review
title_fullStr Key factors for effective implementation of healthcare workers support interventions after patient safety incidents in health organisations: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Key factors for effective implementation of healthcare workers support interventions after patient safety incidents in health organisations: a scoping review
title_sort Key factors for effective implementation of healthcare workers support interventions after patient safety incidents in health organisations: a scoping review
author Guerra-Paiva, S
author_facet Guerra-Paiva, S
Lobão, MJ
Simões, DG
Fernandes, J
Donato, H
Carrillo, I
Mira, JJ
Sousa, P
author_role author
author2 Lobão, MJ
Simões, DG
Fernandes, J
Donato, H
Carrillo, I
Mira, JJ
Sousa, P
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv RIHUC
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Guerra-Paiva, S
Lobão, MJ
Simões, DG
Fernandes, J
Donato, H
Carrillo, I
Mira, JJ
Sousa, P
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Saúde Pública
Segurança do Doente
Qualidade de Cuidados de Saúde
topic Saúde Pública
Segurança do Doente
Qualidade de Cuidados de Saúde
description Abstract Objectives: This study aims to map and frame the main factors present in support interventions successfully implemented in health organisations in order to provide timely and adequate response to healthcare workers (HCWs) after patient safety incidents (PSIs). Design: Scoping review guided by the six-stage approach proposed by Arksey and O'Malley and by PRISMA-ScR. Data sources: CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, Epistemonikos, PsycINFO, PubMed, SciELO Citation Index, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, reference lists of the eligible articles, websites and a consultation group. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: Empirical studies (original articles) were prioritised. We used the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool Version 2018 to conduct a quality assessment of the eligible studies. Data extraction and synthesis: A total of 9766 records were retrieved (last update in November 2022). We assessed 156 articles for eligibility in the full-text screening. Of these, 29 earticles met the eligibility criteria. The articles were independently screened by two authors. In the case of disagreement, a third author was involved. The collected data were organised according to the Organisational factors, People, Environment, Recommendations from other Audies, Attributes of the support interventions. We used EndNote to import articles from the databases and Rayyan to support the screening of titles and abstracts. Results: The existence of an organisational culture based on principles of trust and non-judgement, multidisciplinary action, leadership engagement and strong dissemination of the support programmes' were crucial factors for their effective implementation. Training should be provided for peer supporters and leaders to facilitate the response to HCWs' needs. Regular communication among the implementation team, allocation of protected time, funding and continuous monitoring are useful elements to the sustainability of the programmes. Conclusion: HCWs' well-being depends on an adequate implementation of a complex group of interrelated factors to support them after PSIs.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023
2023-01-01T00:00:00Z
2024-01-08T14:37:15Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.4/2345
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.4/2345
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv BMJ Open . 2023 Dec 27;13(12):e078118.
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078118
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799136833679917056