Revenge and forgiveness: Two sides of the same coin?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Moura, Darlene Pinho Fernandes de
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Sousa, Sophia Lóren de Holanda, Pereira, Isabele Negreiros de Queiroz, Farias, Mariana Gonçalves, Cataldo, Quésia Fernandes, Santos, Walberto Silva dos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.1610
Resumo: The desire to punish someone who has caused suffering is characterized by revenge. However, it ispossible for someone to present pro-social changes in relation to the offender, which constitutesforgiveness. Studies point out that forgiveness and revenge can be understood in the opposite wayand also share a common dimension. In this sense, this study aimed to compare the adjustment of atwo-factor model for forgiveness and revenge with alternative explanations of one-factor and twofactormodels. 195 people participated, the majority female (66.7%), heterosexual (83.2%), single (80.8%), with incomplete higher education (68.4%) and with ages between 18 and 82 years (M=27.26; SD=11.50), who responded to the Willingness to Forgive Scale and the Vengeance Scale. The results showed that the two-factor model was more appropriate [χ2(102)=175.639, p<0.001; χ2/gl=1.54, SRMR=0.06, CFI=0.94, RMSEA=0.061 (CI90%=0.04-0.07), TLI=0.93]. The results found suggest that, in addition to sharing a common factor, the variables seem to have legitimacy as distinct constructs, providing empirical support for the promotion of strategies aimed at intervening in both general and specific elements related to the constructs.
id RCAP_98aa05aa581de09d813b059e10c6cf7c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.localhost:article/1610
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Revenge and forgiveness: Two sides of the same coin?Vingança e perdão: Dois lados de uma mesma moeda?Revenge, Forgiveness, Bifactor.Vingança, Perdão, Bifator.The desire to punish someone who has caused suffering is characterized by revenge. However, it ispossible for someone to present pro-social changes in relation to the offender, which constitutesforgiveness. Studies point out that forgiveness and revenge can be understood in the opposite wayand also share a common dimension. In this sense, this study aimed to compare the adjustment of atwo-factor model for forgiveness and revenge with alternative explanations of one-factor and twofactormodels. 195 people participated, the majority female (66.7%), heterosexual (83.2%), single (80.8%), with incomplete higher education (68.4%) and with ages between 18 and 82 years (M=27.26; SD=11.50), who responded to the Willingness to Forgive Scale and the Vengeance Scale. The results showed that the two-factor model was more appropriate [χ2(102)=175.639, p<0.001; χ2/gl=1.54, SRMR=0.06, CFI=0.94, RMSEA=0.061 (CI90%=0.04-0.07), TLI=0.93]. The results found suggest that, in addition to sharing a common factor, the variables seem to have legitimacy as distinct constructs, providing empirical support for the promotion of strategies aimed at intervening in both general and specific elements related to the constructs.O desejo de punir alguém que tenha causado sofrimento se caracteriza como vingança. Entretanto, é possível que alguém apresente mudanças pró-sociais em relação ao ofensor, o que configura o perdão. Estudos apontam que perdão e vingança podem ser compreendidos de maneira oposta e também compartilharem uma dimensão comum. Nesse sentido, este estudo objetivou comparar o ajuste de um modelo bifator para perdão e vingança com explicações alternativas de modelos de um fator e dois fatores. Contou-se com a participação de 195 pessoas, a maioria do sexo feminino (66.7%), heterossexual (83.2%), solteira (80.8%), com ensino superior incompleto (68.4 %) e com idades entre 18 e 82 anos (M=27.26; DP=11.50), que responderam à Escala de Disposição para Perdoar e à Escala de Atitudes Frente à Vingança. Os resultados apontaram que o modelo bifator se mostrou mais adequado[χ2(102)=175.639, p<0,001; χ2/gl=1.54, SRMR=0.06, CFI=0.94, RMSEA=0.061 (IC90%=0.04-0.07),TLI=0.93]. Os resultados encontrados sugerem que, além de compartilharem um fator comum, asvariáveis parecem ter legitimidade como construtos distintos, dando suporte empírico para a promoçãode estratégias voltadas para se intervir tanto em elementos gerais como específicos relacionados aosconstrutos.ISPA - Instituto Universitário2020-12-23info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.14417/ap.1610https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.1610Análise Psicológica; Vol 38, No 2 (2020); 229-240Análise Psicológica; Vol 38, No 2 (2020); 229-2401646-60200870-8231reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttp://publicacoes.ispa.pt/index.php/ap/article/view/1610http://publicacoes.ispa.pt/index.php/ap/article/view/1610/pdfCopyright (c) 2020 Análise Psicológicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMoura, Darlene Pinho Fernandes deSousa, Sophia Lóren de HolandaPereira, Isabele Negreiros de QueirozFarias, Mariana GonçalvesCataldo, Quésia FernandesSantos, Walberto Silva dos2023-05-11T10:19:39Zoai:ojs.localhost:article/1610Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:51:09.895153Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Revenge and forgiveness: Two sides of the same coin?
Vingança e perdão: Dois lados de uma mesma moeda?
title Revenge and forgiveness: Two sides of the same coin?
spellingShingle Revenge and forgiveness: Two sides of the same coin?
Moura, Darlene Pinho Fernandes de
Revenge, Forgiveness, Bifactor.
Vingança, Perdão, Bifator.
title_short Revenge and forgiveness: Two sides of the same coin?
title_full Revenge and forgiveness: Two sides of the same coin?
title_fullStr Revenge and forgiveness: Two sides of the same coin?
title_full_unstemmed Revenge and forgiveness: Two sides of the same coin?
title_sort Revenge and forgiveness: Two sides of the same coin?
author Moura, Darlene Pinho Fernandes de
author_facet Moura, Darlene Pinho Fernandes de
Sousa, Sophia Lóren de Holanda
Pereira, Isabele Negreiros de Queiroz
Farias, Mariana Gonçalves
Cataldo, Quésia Fernandes
Santos, Walberto Silva dos
author_role author
author2 Sousa, Sophia Lóren de Holanda
Pereira, Isabele Negreiros de Queiroz
Farias, Mariana Gonçalves
Cataldo, Quésia Fernandes
Santos, Walberto Silva dos
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Moura, Darlene Pinho Fernandes de
Sousa, Sophia Lóren de Holanda
Pereira, Isabele Negreiros de Queiroz
Farias, Mariana Gonçalves
Cataldo, Quésia Fernandes
Santos, Walberto Silva dos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Revenge, Forgiveness, Bifactor.
Vingança, Perdão, Bifator.
topic Revenge, Forgiveness, Bifactor.
Vingança, Perdão, Bifator.
description The desire to punish someone who has caused suffering is characterized by revenge. However, it ispossible for someone to present pro-social changes in relation to the offender, which constitutesforgiveness. Studies point out that forgiveness and revenge can be understood in the opposite wayand also share a common dimension. In this sense, this study aimed to compare the adjustment of atwo-factor model for forgiveness and revenge with alternative explanations of one-factor and twofactormodels. 195 people participated, the majority female (66.7%), heterosexual (83.2%), single (80.8%), with incomplete higher education (68.4%) and with ages between 18 and 82 years (M=27.26; SD=11.50), who responded to the Willingness to Forgive Scale and the Vengeance Scale. The results showed that the two-factor model was more appropriate [χ2(102)=175.639, p<0.001; χ2/gl=1.54, SRMR=0.06, CFI=0.94, RMSEA=0.061 (CI90%=0.04-0.07), TLI=0.93]. The results found suggest that, in addition to sharing a common factor, the variables seem to have legitimacy as distinct constructs, providing empirical support for the promotion of strategies aimed at intervening in both general and specific elements related to the constructs.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-23
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.1610
https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.1610
url https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.1610
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://publicacoes.ispa.pt/index.php/ap/article/view/1610
http://publicacoes.ispa.pt/index.php/ap/article/view/1610/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Análise Psicológica
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Análise Psicológica
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ISPA - Instituto Universitário
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ISPA - Instituto Universitário
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Análise Psicológica; Vol 38, No 2 (2020); 229-240
Análise Psicológica; Vol 38, No 2 (2020); 229-240
1646-6020
0870-8231
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131590259900416