Revenge and forgiveness: Two sides of the same coin?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.1610 |
Resumo: | The desire to punish someone who has caused suffering is characterized by revenge. However, it ispossible for someone to present pro-social changes in relation to the offender, which constitutesforgiveness. Studies point out that forgiveness and revenge can be understood in the opposite wayand also share a common dimension. In this sense, this study aimed to compare the adjustment of atwo-factor model for forgiveness and revenge with alternative explanations of one-factor and twofactormodels. 195 people participated, the majority female (66.7%), heterosexual (83.2%), single (80.8%), with incomplete higher education (68.4%) and with ages between 18 and 82 years (M=27.26; SD=11.50), who responded to the Willingness to Forgive Scale and the Vengeance Scale. The results showed that the two-factor model was more appropriate [χ2(102)=175.639, p<0.001; χ2/gl=1.54, SRMR=0.06, CFI=0.94, RMSEA=0.061 (CI90%=0.04-0.07), TLI=0.93]. The results found suggest that, in addition to sharing a common factor, the variables seem to have legitimacy as distinct constructs, providing empirical support for the promotion of strategies aimed at intervening in both general and specific elements related to the constructs. |
id |
RCAP_98aa05aa581de09d813b059e10c6cf7c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.localhost:article/1610 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Revenge and forgiveness: Two sides of the same coin?Vingança e perdão: Dois lados de uma mesma moeda?Revenge, Forgiveness, Bifactor.Vingança, Perdão, Bifator.The desire to punish someone who has caused suffering is characterized by revenge. However, it ispossible for someone to present pro-social changes in relation to the offender, which constitutesforgiveness. Studies point out that forgiveness and revenge can be understood in the opposite wayand also share a common dimension. In this sense, this study aimed to compare the adjustment of atwo-factor model for forgiveness and revenge with alternative explanations of one-factor and twofactormodels. 195 people participated, the majority female (66.7%), heterosexual (83.2%), single (80.8%), with incomplete higher education (68.4%) and with ages between 18 and 82 years (M=27.26; SD=11.50), who responded to the Willingness to Forgive Scale and the Vengeance Scale. The results showed that the two-factor model was more appropriate [χ2(102)=175.639, p<0.001; χ2/gl=1.54, SRMR=0.06, CFI=0.94, RMSEA=0.061 (CI90%=0.04-0.07), TLI=0.93]. The results found suggest that, in addition to sharing a common factor, the variables seem to have legitimacy as distinct constructs, providing empirical support for the promotion of strategies aimed at intervening in both general and specific elements related to the constructs.O desejo de punir alguém que tenha causado sofrimento se caracteriza como vingança. Entretanto, é possível que alguém apresente mudanças pró-sociais em relação ao ofensor, o que configura o perdão. Estudos apontam que perdão e vingança podem ser compreendidos de maneira oposta e também compartilharem uma dimensão comum. Nesse sentido, este estudo objetivou comparar o ajuste de um modelo bifator para perdão e vingança com explicações alternativas de modelos de um fator e dois fatores. Contou-se com a participação de 195 pessoas, a maioria do sexo feminino (66.7%), heterossexual (83.2%), solteira (80.8%), com ensino superior incompleto (68.4 %) e com idades entre 18 e 82 anos (M=27.26; DP=11.50), que responderam à Escala de Disposição para Perdoar e à Escala de Atitudes Frente à Vingança. Os resultados apontaram que o modelo bifator se mostrou mais adequado[χ2(102)=175.639, p<0,001; χ2/gl=1.54, SRMR=0.06, CFI=0.94, RMSEA=0.061 (IC90%=0.04-0.07),TLI=0.93]. Os resultados encontrados sugerem que, além de compartilharem um fator comum, asvariáveis parecem ter legitimidade como construtos distintos, dando suporte empírico para a promoçãode estratégias voltadas para se intervir tanto em elementos gerais como específicos relacionados aosconstrutos.ISPA - Instituto Universitário2020-12-23info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.14417/ap.1610https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.1610Análise Psicológica; Vol 38, No 2 (2020); 229-240Análise Psicológica; Vol 38, No 2 (2020); 229-2401646-60200870-8231reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttp://publicacoes.ispa.pt/index.php/ap/article/view/1610http://publicacoes.ispa.pt/index.php/ap/article/view/1610/pdfCopyright (c) 2020 Análise Psicológicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMoura, Darlene Pinho Fernandes deSousa, Sophia Lóren de HolandaPereira, Isabele Negreiros de QueirozFarias, Mariana GonçalvesCataldo, Quésia FernandesSantos, Walberto Silva dos2023-05-11T10:19:39Zoai:ojs.localhost:article/1610Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:51:09.895153Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Revenge and forgiveness: Two sides of the same coin? Vingança e perdão: Dois lados de uma mesma moeda? |
title |
Revenge and forgiveness: Two sides of the same coin? |
spellingShingle |
Revenge and forgiveness: Two sides of the same coin? Moura, Darlene Pinho Fernandes de Revenge, Forgiveness, Bifactor. Vingança, Perdão, Bifator. |
title_short |
Revenge and forgiveness: Two sides of the same coin? |
title_full |
Revenge and forgiveness: Two sides of the same coin? |
title_fullStr |
Revenge and forgiveness: Two sides of the same coin? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Revenge and forgiveness: Two sides of the same coin? |
title_sort |
Revenge and forgiveness: Two sides of the same coin? |
author |
Moura, Darlene Pinho Fernandes de |
author_facet |
Moura, Darlene Pinho Fernandes de Sousa, Sophia Lóren de Holanda Pereira, Isabele Negreiros de Queiroz Farias, Mariana Gonçalves Cataldo, Quésia Fernandes Santos, Walberto Silva dos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Sousa, Sophia Lóren de Holanda Pereira, Isabele Negreiros de Queiroz Farias, Mariana Gonçalves Cataldo, Quésia Fernandes Santos, Walberto Silva dos |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Moura, Darlene Pinho Fernandes de Sousa, Sophia Lóren de Holanda Pereira, Isabele Negreiros de Queiroz Farias, Mariana Gonçalves Cataldo, Quésia Fernandes Santos, Walberto Silva dos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Revenge, Forgiveness, Bifactor. Vingança, Perdão, Bifator. |
topic |
Revenge, Forgiveness, Bifactor. Vingança, Perdão, Bifator. |
description |
The desire to punish someone who has caused suffering is characterized by revenge. However, it ispossible for someone to present pro-social changes in relation to the offender, which constitutesforgiveness. Studies point out that forgiveness and revenge can be understood in the opposite wayand also share a common dimension. In this sense, this study aimed to compare the adjustment of atwo-factor model for forgiveness and revenge with alternative explanations of one-factor and twofactormodels. 195 people participated, the majority female (66.7%), heterosexual (83.2%), single (80.8%), with incomplete higher education (68.4%) and with ages between 18 and 82 years (M=27.26; SD=11.50), who responded to the Willingness to Forgive Scale and the Vengeance Scale. The results showed that the two-factor model was more appropriate [χ2(102)=175.639, p<0.001; χ2/gl=1.54, SRMR=0.06, CFI=0.94, RMSEA=0.061 (CI90%=0.04-0.07), TLI=0.93]. The results found suggest that, in addition to sharing a common factor, the variables seem to have legitimacy as distinct constructs, providing empirical support for the promotion of strategies aimed at intervening in both general and specific elements related to the constructs. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-23 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.1610 https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.1610 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.1610 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://publicacoes.ispa.pt/index.php/ap/article/view/1610 http://publicacoes.ispa.pt/index.php/ap/article/view/1610/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Análise Psicológica info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Análise Psicológica |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ISPA - Instituto Universitário |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ISPA - Instituto Universitário |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Análise Psicológica; Vol 38, No 2 (2020); 229-240 Análise Psicológica; Vol 38, No 2 (2020); 229-240 1646-6020 0870-8231 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799131590259900416 |