River Activism, “Levees-Only” and the Great Mississippi Flood of 1927
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i1.1179 |
Resumo: | This article investigates media coverage of 19th and early 20th century river activism and its effect on federal policy to control the Mississippi River. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ “levees-only” policy—which joined disparate navigation and flood control interests—is largely blamed for the Great Flood of 1927, called the largest peacetime disaster in American history. River activists organized annual conventions, and later, professional lobbies organized media campaigns up and down the Mississippi River to sway public opinion and pressure Congress to fund flood control and river navigation projects. Annual river conventions drew thousands of delegates such as plantation owners, shippers, bankers, chambers of commerce, governors, congressmen, mayors and cabinet members with interests on the Mississippi River. Public pressure on Congress successfully captured millions of federal dollars to protect property, drain swamps for development, subsidize local levee districts and influence river policy. |
id |
RCAP_9c6661926ac0cd69fcfedf372c793b5e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1179 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
River Activism, “Levees-Only” and the Great Mississippi Flood of 1927activism; commerce; democracy; floods; levees; media; media history; Mississippi River; river conventionsThis article investigates media coverage of 19th and early 20th century river activism and its effect on federal policy to control the Mississippi River. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ “levees-only” policy—which joined disparate navigation and flood control interests—is largely blamed for the Great Flood of 1927, called the largest peacetime disaster in American history. River activists organized annual conventions, and later, professional lobbies organized media campaigns up and down the Mississippi River to sway public opinion and pressure Congress to fund flood control and river navigation projects. Annual river conventions drew thousands of delegates such as plantation owners, shippers, bankers, chambers of commerce, governors, congressmen, mayors and cabinet members with interests on the Mississippi River. Public pressure on Congress successfully captured millions of federal dollars to protect property, drain swamps for development, subsidize local levee districts and influence river policy.Cogitatio2018-02-09info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i1.1179oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1179Media and Communication; Vol 6, No 1 (2018): Media History and Democracy; 43-512183-2439reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/1179https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i1.1179https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/1179/1179Copyright (c) 2018 Ned Randolphhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRandolph, Ned2022-12-20T10:57:34Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1179Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:20:18.397834Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
River Activism, “Levees-Only” and the Great Mississippi Flood of 1927 |
title |
River Activism, “Levees-Only” and the Great Mississippi Flood of 1927 |
spellingShingle |
River Activism, “Levees-Only” and the Great Mississippi Flood of 1927 Randolph, Ned activism; commerce; democracy; floods; levees; media; media history; Mississippi River; river conventions |
title_short |
River Activism, “Levees-Only” and the Great Mississippi Flood of 1927 |
title_full |
River Activism, “Levees-Only” and the Great Mississippi Flood of 1927 |
title_fullStr |
River Activism, “Levees-Only” and the Great Mississippi Flood of 1927 |
title_full_unstemmed |
River Activism, “Levees-Only” and the Great Mississippi Flood of 1927 |
title_sort |
River Activism, “Levees-Only” and the Great Mississippi Flood of 1927 |
author |
Randolph, Ned |
author_facet |
Randolph, Ned |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Randolph, Ned |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
activism; commerce; democracy; floods; levees; media; media history; Mississippi River; river conventions |
topic |
activism; commerce; democracy; floods; levees; media; media history; Mississippi River; river conventions |
description |
This article investigates media coverage of 19th and early 20th century river activism and its effect on federal policy to control the Mississippi River. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ “levees-only” policy—which joined disparate navigation and flood control interests—is largely blamed for the Great Flood of 1927, called the largest peacetime disaster in American history. River activists organized annual conventions, and later, professional lobbies organized media campaigns up and down the Mississippi River to sway public opinion and pressure Congress to fund flood control and river navigation projects. Annual river conventions drew thousands of delegates such as plantation owners, shippers, bankers, chambers of commerce, governors, congressmen, mayors and cabinet members with interests on the Mississippi River. Public pressure on Congress successfully captured millions of federal dollars to protect property, drain swamps for development, subsidize local levee districts and influence river policy. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-02-09 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i1.1179 oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1179 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i1.1179 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1179 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/1179 https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i1.1179 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/1179/1179 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Ned Randolph http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Ned Randolph http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Media and Communication; Vol 6, No 1 (2018): Media History and Democracy; 43-51 2183-2439 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130651772846080 |