Getting to Common Ground: A Comparison of Ontario, Canada’s Provincial Policy Statement and the Auckland Council Regional Policy Statement with Respect to Indigenous Peoples

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: McLeod, Fraser
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Viswanathan, Leela, Macbeth, Jared, Whitelaw, Graham S.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v2i1.850
Resumo: Indigenous rights are crucial to contemporary land use planning and policy in settler states. This article comparatively analyzes the manifest and latent content of the 2014 Provincial Policy Statement of Ontario, Canada (PPS) and the 1999 Auckland Council Regional Policy Statement of Aotearoa New Zealand (ACRPS) in order to evaluate their relative capacity to recognize the rights of Indigenous peoples. While the results show that jurisdiction is an impediment to fostering common ground between Indigenous peoples and settler states, the authors conclude that the PPS and the ACRPS serve vital roles in building dialogue and equitable planning outcomes.
id RCAP_9d30f0f39eb36c3fe69409363fcb3063
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/850
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Getting to Common Ground: A Comparison of Ontario, Canada’s Provincial Policy Statement and the Auckland Council Regional Policy Statement with Respect to Indigenous PeoplesAotearoa; Auckland; Canada; comparative policy; Indigenous; land use planningIndigenous rights are crucial to contemporary land use planning and policy in settler states. This article comparatively analyzes the manifest and latent content of the 2014 Provincial Policy Statement of Ontario, Canada (PPS) and the 1999 Auckland Council Regional Policy Statement of Aotearoa New Zealand (ACRPS) in order to evaluate their relative capacity to recognize the rights of Indigenous peoples. While the results show that jurisdiction is an impediment to fostering common ground between Indigenous peoples and settler states, the authors conclude that the PPS and the ACRPS serve vital roles in building dialogue and equitable planning outcomes.Cogitatio2017-04-03info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/up.v2i1.850oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/850Urban Planning; Vol 2, No 1 (2017): Urban Forms and Future Cities; 72-872183-7635reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/850https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v2i1.850https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/850/850Copyright (c) 2017 Fraser McLeod, Leela Viswanathan, Jared Macbeth, Graham S. Whitelawhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMcLeod, FraserViswanathan, LeelaMacbeth, JaredWhitelaw, Graham S.2022-12-20T11:00:08Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/850Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:22:04.060405Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Getting to Common Ground: A Comparison of Ontario, Canada’s Provincial Policy Statement and the Auckland Council Regional Policy Statement with Respect to Indigenous Peoples
title Getting to Common Ground: A Comparison of Ontario, Canada’s Provincial Policy Statement and the Auckland Council Regional Policy Statement with Respect to Indigenous Peoples
spellingShingle Getting to Common Ground: A Comparison of Ontario, Canada’s Provincial Policy Statement and the Auckland Council Regional Policy Statement with Respect to Indigenous Peoples
McLeod, Fraser
Aotearoa; Auckland; Canada; comparative policy; Indigenous; land use planning
title_short Getting to Common Ground: A Comparison of Ontario, Canada’s Provincial Policy Statement and the Auckland Council Regional Policy Statement with Respect to Indigenous Peoples
title_full Getting to Common Ground: A Comparison of Ontario, Canada’s Provincial Policy Statement and the Auckland Council Regional Policy Statement with Respect to Indigenous Peoples
title_fullStr Getting to Common Ground: A Comparison of Ontario, Canada’s Provincial Policy Statement and the Auckland Council Regional Policy Statement with Respect to Indigenous Peoples
title_full_unstemmed Getting to Common Ground: A Comparison of Ontario, Canada’s Provincial Policy Statement and the Auckland Council Regional Policy Statement with Respect to Indigenous Peoples
title_sort Getting to Common Ground: A Comparison of Ontario, Canada’s Provincial Policy Statement and the Auckland Council Regional Policy Statement with Respect to Indigenous Peoples
author McLeod, Fraser
author_facet McLeod, Fraser
Viswanathan, Leela
Macbeth, Jared
Whitelaw, Graham S.
author_role author
author2 Viswanathan, Leela
Macbeth, Jared
Whitelaw, Graham S.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv McLeod, Fraser
Viswanathan, Leela
Macbeth, Jared
Whitelaw, Graham S.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Aotearoa; Auckland; Canada; comparative policy; Indigenous; land use planning
topic Aotearoa; Auckland; Canada; comparative policy; Indigenous; land use planning
description Indigenous rights are crucial to contemporary land use planning and policy in settler states. This article comparatively analyzes the manifest and latent content of the 2014 Provincial Policy Statement of Ontario, Canada (PPS) and the 1999 Auckland Council Regional Policy Statement of Aotearoa New Zealand (ACRPS) in order to evaluate their relative capacity to recognize the rights of Indigenous peoples. While the results show that jurisdiction is an impediment to fostering common ground between Indigenous peoples and settler states, the authors conclude that the PPS and the ACRPS serve vital roles in building dialogue and equitable planning outcomes.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-04-03
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v2i1.850
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/850
url https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v2i1.850
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/850
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/850
https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v2i1.850
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/850/850
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Fraser McLeod, Leela Viswanathan, Jared Macbeth, Graham S. Whitelaw
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Fraser McLeod, Leela Viswanathan, Jared Macbeth, Graham S. Whitelaw
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Urban Planning; Vol 2, No 1 (2017): Urban Forms and Future Cities; 72-87
2183-7635
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130666630119424

Registros relacionados