Biomedical microfluidic devices by using low-cost fabrication techniques: a review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Faustino, Vera
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Catarino, Susana, Lima, Rui A., Minas, Graça
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10198/15393
Resumo: One of the most popular methods to fabricate biomedical microfluidic devices is by using a soft-lithography technique. However, the fabrication of the moulds to produce microfluidic devices, such as SU-8 moulds, usually requires a cleanroom environment that can be quite costly. Therefore, many efforts have been made to develop low-cost alternatives for the fabrication of microstructures, avoiding the use of cleanroom facilities. Recently, low-cost techniques without cleanroom facilities that feature aspect ratios more than 20, for fabricating those SU-8 moulds have been gaining popularity among biomedical research community. In those techniques, Ultraviolet (UV) exposure equipment, commonly used in the Printed Circuit Board (PCB) industry, replaces the more expensive and less available Mask Aligner that has been used in the last 15 years for SU-8 patterning. Alternatively, non-lithographic low-cost techniques, due to their ability for large-scale production, have increased the interest of the industrial and research community to develop simple, rapid and low-cost microfluidic structures. These alternative techniques include Print and Peel methods (PAP), laserjet, solid ink, cutting plotters or micromilling, that use equipment available in almost all laboratories and offices. An example is the xurography technique that uses a cutting plotter machine and adhesive vinyl films to generate the master moulds to fabricate microfluidic channels. In this review, we present a selection of the most recent lithographic and non-lithographic low-cost techniques to fabricate microfluidic structures, focused on the features and limitations of each technique. Only microfabrication methods that do not require the use of cleanrooms are considered. Additionally, potential applications of these microfluidic devices in biomedical engineering are presented with some illustrative examples.
id RCAP_a0abe2926150eca31b9a71784ad0e5a6
oai_identifier_str oai:bibliotecadigital.ipb.pt:10198/15393
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Biomedical microfluidic devices by using low-cost fabrication techniques: a reviewBiomedical microdevicesBiomicrofluidicsLow-costNonlithographic techniqueSoft lithographyOne of the most popular methods to fabricate biomedical microfluidic devices is by using a soft-lithography technique. However, the fabrication of the moulds to produce microfluidic devices, such as SU-8 moulds, usually requires a cleanroom environment that can be quite costly. Therefore, many efforts have been made to develop low-cost alternatives for the fabrication of microstructures, avoiding the use of cleanroom facilities. Recently, low-cost techniques without cleanroom facilities that feature aspect ratios more than 20, for fabricating those SU-8 moulds have been gaining popularity among biomedical research community. In those techniques, Ultraviolet (UV) exposure equipment, commonly used in the Printed Circuit Board (PCB) industry, replaces the more expensive and less available Mask Aligner that has been used in the last 15 years for SU-8 patterning. Alternatively, non-lithographic low-cost techniques, due to their ability for large-scale production, have increased the interest of the industrial and research community to develop simple, rapid and low-cost microfluidic structures. These alternative techniques include Print and Peel methods (PAP), laserjet, solid ink, cutting plotters or micromilling, that use equipment available in almost all laboratories and offices. An example is the xurography technique that uses a cutting plotter machine and adhesive vinyl films to generate the master moulds to fabricate microfluidic channels. In this review, we present a selection of the most recent lithographic and non-lithographic low-cost techniques to fabricate microfluidic structures, focused on the features and limitations of each technique. Only microfabrication methods that do not require the use of cleanrooms are considered. Additionally, potential applications of these microfluidic devices in biomedical engineering are presented with some illustrative examples.The authorsacknowledgethe financial supportprovidedby PTDC/SAU-ENB/116929/2010andEXPL/EMS-SIS/2215/2013 from FCT (ScienceandTechnologyFoundation),COMPETE,QRENand European Union(FEDER).R.O.Rodrigues,D.PinhoandV.Faustino acknowledgerespectively,thePhDscholarshipsSFRH/BD/97658/ 2013,SFRH/BD/89077/2012andSFRH/BD/99696/2014Grantedby FCT.TheauthorsarealsoverygratefultoProfessorTakujiIshikawa and ProfessorTakamiYamaguchi(TohokuUniversity)forsup- porting thisresearchwork.Biblioteca Digital do IPBFaustino, VeraCatarino, SusanaLima, Rui A.Minas, Graça2018-01-31T10:00:00Z20162016-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10198/15393engFaustino, Vera; Catarino, Susana O.; Lima, Rui; Minas, Graça (2016). Biomedical microfluidic devices by using low-cost fabrication techniques: a review. Journal of Biomechanics. ISSN 0021-9290. 49, p. 2280-22920021-929010.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.11.031info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-21T10:35:59Zoai:bibliotecadigital.ipb.pt:10198/15393Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T23:04:59.795486Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Biomedical microfluidic devices by using low-cost fabrication techniques: a review
title Biomedical microfluidic devices by using low-cost fabrication techniques: a review
spellingShingle Biomedical microfluidic devices by using low-cost fabrication techniques: a review
Faustino, Vera
Biomedical microdevices
Biomicrofluidics
Low-cost
Nonlithographic technique
Soft lithography
title_short Biomedical microfluidic devices by using low-cost fabrication techniques: a review
title_full Biomedical microfluidic devices by using low-cost fabrication techniques: a review
title_fullStr Biomedical microfluidic devices by using low-cost fabrication techniques: a review
title_full_unstemmed Biomedical microfluidic devices by using low-cost fabrication techniques: a review
title_sort Biomedical microfluidic devices by using low-cost fabrication techniques: a review
author Faustino, Vera
author_facet Faustino, Vera
Catarino, Susana
Lima, Rui A.
Minas, Graça
author_role author
author2 Catarino, Susana
Lima, Rui A.
Minas, Graça
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital do IPB
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Faustino, Vera
Catarino, Susana
Lima, Rui A.
Minas, Graça
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Biomedical microdevices
Biomicrofluidics
Low-cost
Nonlithographic technique
Soft lithography
topic Biomedical microdevices
Biomicrofluidics
Low-cost
Nonlithographic technique
Soft lithography
description One of the most popular methods to fabricate biomedical microfluidic devices is by using a soft-lithography technique. However, the fabrication of the moulds to produce microfluidic devices, such as SU-8 moulds, usually requires a cleanroom environment that can be quite costly. Therefore, many efforts have been made to develop low-cost alternatives for the fabrication of microstructures, avoiding the use of cleanroom facilities. Recently, low-cost techniques without cleanroom facilities that feature aspect ratios more than 20, for fabricating those SU-8 moulds have been gaining popularity among biomedical research community. In those techniques, Ultraviolet (UV) exposure equipment, commonly used in the Printed Circuit Board (PCB) industry, replaces the more expensive and less available Mask Aligner that has been used in the last 15 years for SU-8 patterning. Alternatively, non-lithographic low-cost techniques, due to their ability for large-scale production, have increased the interest of the industrial and research community to develop simple, rapid and low-cost microfluidic structures. These alternative techniques include Print and Peel methods (PAP), laserjet, solid ink, cutting plotters or micromilling, that use equipment available in almost all laboratories and offices. An example is the xurography technique that uses a cutting plotter machine and adhesive vinyl films to generate the master moulds to fabricate microfluidic channels. In this review, we present a selection of the most recent lithographic and non-lithographic low-cost techniques to fabricate microfluidic structures, focused on the features and limitations of each technique. Only microfabrication methods that do not require the use of cleanrooms are considered. Additionally, potential applications of these microfluidic devices in biomedical engineering are presented with some illustrative examples.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z
2018-01-31T10:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10198/15393
url http://hdl.handle.net/10198/15393
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Faustino, Vera; Catarino, Susana O.; Lima, Rui; Minas, Graça (2016). Biomedical microfluidic devices by using low-cost fabrication techniques: a review. Journal of Biomechanics. ISSN 0021-9290. 49, p. 2280-2292
0021-9290
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.11.031
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799135298345500672