The “Indigènes de la République” and political mobilization strategies in postcolonial France

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Zobel, Clemens
Data de Publicação: 2010
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10316/36166
https://doi.org/10.4000/eces.390
Resumo: I discuss the debate on the controversial petition “Nous sommes les Indigènes de la République!” (We are the Indigenous of the Republic) published in 2005 by a group of intellectuals and activists working in the field of immigration issues in France. It critically scrutinizes the idea that the petition could be understood as a new political mobilization strategy emphasizing ethnic, religious or racial differences. While recognizing the salience of this argument, I address its implicit conclusions concerning the supposedly depoliticizing and essentializing consequences of such a move. Placing the petition in its historical context and analysing its content, I contend that, referring to colonial regimes of segregation, the self-identification “indigenes” fundamentally concerns the denial of full citizen’s rights through religious, ethnic or racial categories rather than the entrenching of difference. Drawing parallels with a dominant trend in the appraisal of post-colonial studies in France, I conclude that academic thought on the petition reflects a general tendency of failing to come to terms with difference without falling back on an opposition between political universalism and apolitical communitarianism.
id RCAP_a1d80e9987f63e1a12eec98770b8f17f
oai_identifier_str oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/36166
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling The “Indigènes de la République” and political mobilization strategies in postcolonial FranceIndigènes de la RépubliquePostcolonialismRepublicanismImmigrationPolitical mobilizationIdentityI discuss the debate on the controversial petition “Nous sommes les Indigènes de la République!” (We are the Indigenous of the Republic) published in 2005 by a group of intellectuals and activists working in the field of immigration issues in France. It critically scrutinizes the idea that the petition could be understood as a new political mobilization strategy emphasizing ethnic, religious or racial differences. While recognizing the salience of this argument, I address its implicit conclusions concerning the supposedly depoliticizing and essentializing consequences of such a move. Placing the petition in its historical context and analysing its content, I contend that, referring to colonial regimes of segregation, the self-identification “indigenes” fundamentally concerns the denial of full citizen’s rights through religious, ethnic or racial categories rather than the entrenching of difference. Drawing parallels with a dominant trend in the appraisal of post-colonial studies in France, I conclude that academic thought on the petition reflects a general tendency of failing to come to terms with difference without falling back on an opposition between political universalism and apolitical communitarianism.Centro de Estudos Sociais2010info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10316/36166http://hdl.handle.net/10316/36166https://doi.org/10.4000/eces.390https://doi.org/10.4000/eces.390eng1647-0737http://eces.revues.org/390Zobel, Clemensinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2021-06-29T10:03:43Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/36166Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:50:48.910757Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The “Indigènes de la République” and political mobilization strategies in postcolonial France
title The “Indigènes de la République” and political mobilization strategies in postcolonial France
spellingShingle The “Indigènes de la République” and political mobilization strategies in postcolonial France
Zobel, Clemens
Indigènes de la République
Postcolonialism
Republicanism
Immigration
Political mobilization
Identity
title_short The “Indigènes de la République” and political mobilization strategies in postcolonial France
title_full The “Indigènes de la République” and political mobilization strategies in postcolonial France
title_fullStr The “Indigènes de la République” and political mobilization strategies in postcolonial France
title_full_unstemmed The “Indigènes de la République” and political mobilization strategies in postcolonial France
title_sort The “Indigènes de la République” and political mobilization strategies in postcolonial France
author Zobel, Clemens
author_facet Zobel, Clemens
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Zobel, Clemens
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Indigènes de la République
Postcolonialism
Republicanism
Immigration
Political mobilization
Identity
topic Indigènes de la République
Postcolonialism
Republicanism
Immigration
Political mobilization
Identity
description I discuss the debate on the controversial petition “Nous sommes les Indigènes de la République!” (We are the Indigenous of the Republic) published in 2005 by a group of intellectuals and activists working in the field of immigration issues in France. It critically scrutinizes the idea that the petition could be understood as a new political mobilization strategy emphasizing ethnic, religious or racial differences. While recognizing the salience of this argument, I address its implicit conclusions concerning the supposedly depoliticizing and essentializing consequences of such a move. Placing the petition in its historical context and analysing its content, I contend that, referring to colonial regimes of segregation, the self-identification “indigenes” fundamentally concerns the denial of full citizen’s rights through religious, ethnic or racial categories rather than the entrenching of difference. Drawing parallels with a dominant trend in the appraisal of post-colonial studies in France, I conclude that academic thought on the petition reflects a general tendency of failing to come to terms with difference without falling back on an opposition between political universalism and apolitical communitarianism.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10316/36166
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/36166
https://doi.org/10.4000/eces.390
https://doi.org/10.4000/eces.390
url http://hdl.handle.net/10316/36166
https://doi.org/10.4000/eces.390
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1647-0737
http://eces.revues.org/390
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro de Estudos Sociais
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro de Estudos Sociais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133788915105792