Rapid test detection of anti-infliximab antibodies: performance comparison with three different immunoassays
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.16/2724 |
Resumo: | Background and aims: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of infliximab (IFX) and anti-infliximab antibodies (ATIs) is essential for treatment optimisation in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. The aim of this study was to estimate and compare the agreement and accuracy between a new rapid test and three established enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) to quantify ATIs levels, and to evaluate the impact of exogenous IFX on the performance of these assays. Methods: We analysed 200 serum samples from 57 IBD outpatients in IFX induction or maintenance therapy at six IBD centres in Portugal. ATI levels were quantified using the rapid test Quantum Blue® (QB) Anti-Infliximab (Bühlmann) and three established ELISAs: In-House, Theradiag (Lisa Tracker Anti-Infliximab), and Immundiagnostik (IDKmonitor Infliximab). ATIs were quantified in patients' serum samples and spiked samples with exogenous IFX, based on analytical and clinical cutoffs. Qualitative agreement and accuracy were estimated by Cohen's kappa (k) with 95% confidence intervals. Results: ATIs quantification with clinical cutoffs showed a slight agreement between QB rapid test and In-House [k = 0.163 (0.051-0.276)] and Immundiagnostik [k = 0.085 (0.000-0.177)]. Regarding IFX/ATIs status, the QB rapid test showed a substantial agreement with Theradiag [k = 0.808 (0.729-0.888)] and a fair agreement with In-House [k = 0.343 (0.254-0.431)] and Immundiagnostik [k = 0.217 (0.138-0.297)]. The QB rapid test could not detect ATI-positive levels in samples with exogenous IFX at 5-300 µg/ml. Interference on ATIs detection was observed at exogenous IFX ⩾30 µg/ml for In-house and Immundiagnostik assays. Conclusion: QB rapid test is only suitable to detect ATI-positive levels in the absence of IFX. |
id |
RCAP_a2625b8df96aefe263b53c40d118b1e3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.chporto.pt:10400.16/2724 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Rapid test detection of anti-infliximab antibodies: performance comparison with three different immunoassaysantibodiesdrug monitoringenzyme-linked immunosorbent assayimmunoassayinflammatory bowel diseasesinfliximabpoint-of-care systemsBackground and aims: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of infliximab (IFX) and anti-infliximab antibodies (ATIs) is essential for treatment optimisation in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. The aim of this study was to estimate and compare the agreement and accuracy between a new rapid test and three established enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) to quantify ATIs levels, and to evaluate the impact of exogenous IFX on the performance of these assays. Methods: We analysed 200 serum samples from 57 IBD outpatients in IFX induction or maintenance therapy at six IBD centres in Portugal. ATI levels were quantified using the rapid test Quantum Blue® (QB) Anti-Infliximab (Bühlmann) and three established ELISAs: In-House, Theradiag (Lisa Tracker Anti-Infliximab), and Immundiagnostik (IDKmonitor Infliximab). ATIs were quantified in patients' serum samples and spiked samples with exogenous IFX, based on analytical and clinical cutoffs. Qualitative agreement and accuracy were estimated by Cohen's kappa (k) with 95% confidence intervals. Results: ATIs quantification with clinical cutoffs showed a slight agreement between QB rapid test and In-House [k = 0.163 (0.051-0.276)] and Immundiagnostik [k = 0.085 (0.000-0.177)]. Regarding IFX/ATIs status, the QB rapid test showed a substantial agreement with Theradiag [k = 0.808 (0.729-0.888)] and a fair agreement with In-House [k = 0.343 (0.254-0.431)] and Immundiagnostik [k = 0.217 (0.138-0.297)]. The QB rapid test could not detect ATI-positive levels in samples with exogenous IFX at 5-300 µg/ml. Interference on ATIs detection was observed at exogenous IFX ⩾30 µg/ml for In-house and Immundiagnostik assays. Conclusion: QB rapid test is only suitable to detect ATI-positive levels in the absence of IFX.The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was funded in part by the Portuguese IBD Study Group (GEDII), and in part by PDE/BDE/114583/2016, from Portuguese national funds by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT).SAGE PublicationsRepositório Científico do Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo AntónioRocha, CátiaLago, PaulaFernandes, SamuelCorreia, LuísPortela, FranciscoVieira, Ana IsabelPatita, MartaArroja, BrunoMinistro, PaulaAlves, CatarinaDias, Cláudia CamilaMagro, Fernando2022-07-14T14:07:47Z20202020-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.16/2724engRocha C, Lago P, Fernandes S, et al. Rapid test detection of anti-infliximab antibodies: performance comparison with three different immunoassays. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2020;13:1756284820965790. doi:10.1177/17562848209657901756-283X10.1177/1756284820965790info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-10-20T11:02:00Zoai:repositorio.chporto.pt:10400.16/2724Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:38:54.885367Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Rapid test detection of anti-infliximab antibodies: performance comparison with three different immunoassays |
title |
Rapid test detection of anti-infliximab antibodies: performance comparison with three different immunoassays |
spellingShingle |
Rapid test detection of anti-infliximab antibodies: performance comparison with three different immunoassays Rocha, Cátia antibodies drug monitoring enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay immunoassay inflammatory bowel diseases infliximab point-of-care systems |
title_short |
Rapid test detection of anti-infliximab antibodies: performance comparison with three different immunoassays |
title_full |
Rapid test detection of anti-infliximab antibodies: performance comparison with three different immunoassays |
title_fullStr |
Rapid test detection of anti-infliximab antibodies: performance comparison with three different immunoassays |
title_full_unstemmed |
Rapid test detection of anti-infliximab antibodies: performance comparison with three different immunoassays |
title_sort |
Rapid test detection of anti-infliximab antibodies: performance comparison with three different immunoassays |
author |
Rocha, Cátia |
author_facet |
Rocha, Cátia Lago, Paula Fernandes, Samuel Correia, Luís Portela, Francisco Vieira, Ana Isabel Patita, Marta Arroja, Bruno Ministro, Paula Alves, Catarina Dias, Cláudia Camila Magro, Fernando |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lago, Paula Fernandes, Samuel Correia, Luís Portela, Francisco Vieira, Ana Isabel Patita, Marta Arroja, Bruno Ministro, Paula Alves, Catarina Dias, Cláudia Camila Magro, Fernando |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico do Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rocha, Cátia Lago, Paula Fernandes, Samuel Correia, Luís Portela, Francisco Vieira, Ana Isabel Patita, Marta Arroja, Bruno Ministro, Paula Alves, Catarina Dias, Cláudia Camila Magro, Fernando |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
antibodies drug monitoring enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay immunoassay inflammatory bowel diseases infliximab point-of-care systems |
topic |
antibodies drug monitoring enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay immunoassay inflammatory bowel diseases infliximab point-of-care systems |
description |
Background and aims: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of infliximab (IFX) and anti-infliximab antibodies (ATIs) is essential for treatment optimisation in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. The aim of this study was to estimate and compare the agreement and accuracy between a new rapid test and three established enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) to quantify ATIs levels, and to evaluate the impact of exogenous IFX on the performance of these assays. Methods: We analysed 200 serum samples from 57 IBD outpatients in IFX induction or maintenance therapy at six IBD centres in Portugal. ATI levels were quantified using the rapid test Quantum Blue® (QB) Anti-Infliximab (Bühlmann) and three established ELISAs: In-House, Theradiag (Lisa Tracker Anti-Infliximab), and Immundiagnostik (IDKmonitor Infliximab). ATIs were quantified in patients' serum samples and spiked samples with exogenous IFX, based on analytical and clinical cutoffs. Qualitative agreement and accuracy were estimated by Cohen's kappa (k) with 95% confidence intervals. Results: ATIs quantification with clinical cutoffs showed a slight agreement between QB rapid test and In-House [k = 0.163 (0.051-0.276)] and Immundiagnostik [k = 0.085 (0.000-0.177)]. Regarding IFX/ATIs status, the QB rapid test showed a substantial agreement with Theradiag [k = 0.808 (0.729-0.888)] and a fair agreement with In-House [k = 0.343 (0.254-0.431)] and Immundiagnostik [k = 0.217 (0.138-0.297)]. The QB rapid test could not detect ATI-positive levels in samples with exogenous IFX at 5-300 µg/ml. Interference on ATIs detection was observed at exogenous IFX ⩾30 µg/ml for In-house and Immundiagnostik assays. Conclusion: QB rapid test is only suitable to detect ATI-positive levels in the absence of IFX. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020 2020-01-01T00:00:00Z 2022-07-14T14:07:47Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.16/2724 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.16/2724 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Rocha C, Lago P, Fernandes S, et al. Rapid test detection of anti-infliximab antibodies: performance comparison with three different immunoassays. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2020;13:1756284820965790. doi:10.1177/1756284820965790 1756-283X 10.1177/1756284820965790 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SAGE Publications |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SAGE Publications |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799133649189208064 |