How to Produce and Measure Throughput Legitimacy? Lessons from a Systematic Literature Review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.4011 |
Resumo: | After two decades of research on throughput legitimacy, making sense of the stock of accumulated knowledge remains a challenge. How can relevant publications on throughput legitimacy be collected and analysed? How can the level of throughput legitimacy be measured? Which policy activities contribute to the production of throughput legitimacy? To answer these questions, we designed and implemented an original systematic literature review. We find that the measurement of the level of throughput legitimacy introduces a number of problems that call for the systematic and rigorous use of a more complete set of precise, specific indicators to advance the theory of throughput legitimacy. A number of participatory decision-making activities contribute to the production of throughput legitimacy. Engaging in these activities is not without risk, as variations in throughput legitimacy affect input and output legitimacy. To prevent vicious circles, lessons can be drawn from the literature on collaborative governance and decision-makers’ strategies to support effective collaboration between stakeholders. |
id |
RCAP_a2fa73be22cbdcdfa8f1a502d52e1e53 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4011 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
How to Produce and Measure Throughput Legitimacy? Lessons from a Systematic Literature Reviewcitation network analysis; collaborative governance; legitimacy; quantitative text analysis; systematic literature review; throughput legitimacyAfter two decades of research on throughput legitimacy, making sense of the stock of accumulated knowledge remains a challenge. How can relevant publications on throughput legitimacy be collected and analysed? How can the level of throughput legitimacy be measured? Which policy activities contribute to the production of throughput legitimacy? To answer these questions, we designed and implemented an original systematic literature review. We find that the measurement of the level of throughput legitimacy introduces a number of problems that call for the systematic and rigorous use of a more complete set of precise, specific indicators to advance the theory of throughput legitimacy. A number of participatory decision-making activities contribute to the production of throughput legitimacy. Engaging in these activities is not without risk, as variations in throughput legitimacy affect input and output legitimacy. To prevent vicious circles, lessons can be drawn from the literature on collaborative governance and decision-makers’ strategies to support effective collaboration between stakeholders.Cogitatio2021-03-31info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.4011oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4011Politics and Governance; Vol 9, No 1 (2021): Access or Excess? Redefining the Boundaries of Transparency in the EU’s Decision-Making; 226-2362183-2463reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4011https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.4011https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4011/4011Copyright (c) 2021 Vincent Caby, Lise Frehenhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCaby, VincentFrehen, Lise2022-12-22T15:16:49Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4011Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:22:30.903180Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
How to Produce and Measure Throughput Legitimacy? Lessons from a Systematic Literature Review |
title |
How to Produce and Measure Throughput Legitimacy? Lessons from a Systematic Literature Review |
spellingShingle |
How to Produce and Measure Throughput Legitimacy? Lessons from a Systematic Literature Review Caby, Vincent citation network analysis; collaborative governance; legitimacy; quantitative text analysis; systematic literature review; throughput legitimacy |
title_short |
How to Produce and Measure Throughput Legitimacy? Lessons from a Systematic Literature Review |
title_full |
How to Produce and Measure Throughput Legitimacy? Lessons from a Systematic Literature Review |
title_fullStr |
How to Produce and Measure Throughput Legitimacy? Lessons from a Systematic Literature Review |
title_full_unstemmed |
How to Produce and Measure Throughput Legitimacy? Lessons from a Systematic Literature Review |
title_sort |
How to Produce and Measure Throughput Legitimacy? Lessons from a Systematic Literature Review |
author |
Caby, Vincent |
author_facet |
Caby, Vincent Frehen, Lise |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Frehen, Lise |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Caby, Vincent Frehen, Lise |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
citation network analysis; collaborative governance; legitimacy; quantitative text analysis; systematic literature review; throughput legitimacy |
topic |
citation network analysis; collaborative governance; legitimacy; quantitative text analysis; systematic literature review; throughput legitimacy |
description |
After two decades of research on throughput legitimacy, making sense of the stock of accumulated knowledge remains a challenge. How can relevant publications on throughput legitimacy be collected and analysed? How can the level of throughput legitimacy be measured? Which policy activities contribute to the production of throughput legitimacy? To answer these questions, we designed and implemented an original systematic literature review. We find that the measurement of the level of throughput legitimacy introduces a number of problems that call for the systematic and rigorous use of a more complete set of precise, specific indicators to advance the theory of throughput legitimacy. A number of participatory decision-making activities contribute to the production of throughput legitimacy. Engaging in these activities is not without risk, as variations in throughput legitimacy affect input and output legitimacy. To prevent vicious circles, lessons can be drawn from the literature on collaborative governance and decision-makers’ strategies to support effective collaboration between stakeholders. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-03-31 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.4011 oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4011 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.4011 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4011 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4011 https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.4011 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4011/4011 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Vincent Caby, Lise Frehen http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Vincent Caby, Lise Frehen http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Politics and Governance; Vol 9, No 1 (2021): Access or Excess? Redefining the Boundaries of Transparency in the EU’s Decision-Making; 226-236 2183-2463 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130671057207296 |