The Implementation of the REACH Authorisation Procedure on Chemical Substances of Concern: What Kind of Legitimacy?

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Klika, Christoph
Publication Date: 2015
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Download full: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v3i1.85
Summary: With the increasing “agencification” of policy making in the European Union (EU), normative questions regarding the legitimacy of EU agencies have become ever more important. This article analyses the role of expertise and legitimacy with regard to the European Chemicals Agency ECHA. Based on the REACH regulation, so-called Substances of Very High Concern (SVHCs) are subject to authorisation. The authorisation procedure aims to ensure the good functioning of the internal market, while assuring that risks of SVHCs are properly controlled. Since ECHA has become operational in 2008, recurring decisions on SVHCs have been made. The question posed in this article is: to what extent can decision making in the REACH authorisation procedure be assessed as legitimate? By drawing on the notion of throughput legitimacy, this article argues that decision making processes in the authorisation procedure are characterized by insufficient legitimacy.
id RCAP_0cc53f4d653ff14aefa1d09eac7c4649
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/85
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling The Implementation of the REACH Authorisation Procedure on Chemical Substances of Concern: What Kind of Legitimacy?authorisation; ECHA; expertise; REACH; SVHCs; throughput legitimacyWith the increasing “agencification” of policy making in the European Union (EU), normative questions regarding the legitimacy of EU agencies have become ever more important. This article analyses the role of expertise and legitimacy with regard to the European Chemicals Agency ECHA. Based on the REACH regulation, so-called Substances of Very High Concern (SVHCs) are subject to authorisation. The authorisation procedure aims to ensure the good functioning of the internal market, while assuring that risks of SVHCs are properly controlled. Since ECHA has become operational in 2008, recurring decisions on SVHCs have been made. The question posed in this article is: to what extent can decision making in the REACH authorisation procedure be assessed as legitimate? By drawing on the notion of throughput legitimacy, this article argues that decision making processes in the authorisation procedure are characterized by insufficient legitimacy.Cogitatio2015-03-31info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v3i1.85oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/85Politics and Governance; Vol 3, No 1 (2015): The Role of Expert Knowledge in EU Executive Institutions; 128-1382183-2463reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/85https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v3i1.85https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/85/85http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKlika, Christoph2022-12-22T15:15:33Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/85Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:22:09.817201Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Implementation of the REACH Authorisation Procedure on Chemical Substances of Concern: What Kind of Legitimacy?
title The Implementation of the REACH Authorisation Procedure on Chemical Substances of Concern: What Kind of Legitimacy?
spellingShingle The Implementation of the REACH Authorisation Procedure on Chemical Substances of Concern: What Kind of Legitimacy?
Klika, Christoph
authorisation; ECHA; expertise; REACH; SVHCs; throughput legitimacy
title_short The Implementation of the REACH Authorisation Procedure on Chemical Substances of Concern: What Kind of Legitimacy?
title_full The Implementation of the REACH Authorisation Procedure on Chemical Substances of Concern: What Kind of Legitimacy?
title_fullStr The Implementation of the REACH Authorisation Procedure on Chemical Substances of Concern: What Kind of Legitimacy?
title_full_unstemmed The Implementation of the REACH Authorisation Procedure on Chemical Substances of Concern: What Kind of Legitimacy?
title_sort The Implementation of the REACH Authorisation Procedure on Chemical Substances of Concern: What Kind of Legitimacy?
author Klika, Christoph
author_facet Klika, Christoph
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Klika, Christoph
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv authorisation; ECHA; expertise; REACH; SVHCs; throughput legitimacy
topic authorisation; ECHA; expertise; REACH; SVHCs; throughput legitimacy
description With the increasing “agencification” of policy making in the European Union (EU), normative questions regarding the legitimacy of EU agencies have become ever more important. This article analyses the role of expertise and legitimacy with regard to the European Chemicals Agency ECHA. Based on the REACH regulation, so-called Substances of Very High Concern (SVHCs) are subject to authorisation. The authorisation procedure aims to ensure the good functioning of the internal market, while assuring that risks of SVHCs are properly controlled. Since ECHA has become operational in 2008, recurring decisions on SVHCs have been made. The question posed in this article is: to what extent can decision making in the REACH authorisation procedure be assessed as legitimate? By drawing on the notion of throughput legitimacy, this article argues that decision making processes in the authorisation procedure are characterized by insufficient legitimacy.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-03-31
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v3i1.85
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/85
url https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v3i1.85
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/85
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/85
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v3i1.85
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/85/85
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Politics and Governance; Vol 3, No 1 (2015): The Role of Expert Knowledge in EU Executive Institutions; 128-138
2183-2463
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130667410259968