Comment un État libéral peut-il être à la fois neutre et paternaliste?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Merrill, Nathaniel Roberto Buil
Data de Publicação: 2011
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: fra
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/1822/47734
Resumo: In this article I defend that liberal perfectionism, even when paternalistic, is compatible with state neutrality. I defend this compatibility as follows. First, I distinguish three types of neutrality. Then, I distinguish three types of paternalism. I then examine under what conditions neutrality and paternalism can be compatible. Finally, I argue that neutrality of consequences, which seems to be the most demanding version of neutrality, is also compatible with paternalism and will conclude by suggesting that the only way to make paternalism and neutrality incompatible is to require that neutrality encompasses at the same time neutral justifications, aims, and consequences.
id RCAP_a3ba5d9b3ad81a1580d2db7703addf93
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/47734
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Comment un État libéral peut-il être à la fois neutre et paternaliste?How can the liberal State be neutral and paternalistic?NeutralityLiberalismPerfectionismHumanidades::Filosofia, Ética e ReligiãoIn this article I defend that liberal perfectionism, even when paternalistic, is compatible with state neutrality. I defend this compatibility as follows. First, I distinguish three types of neutrality. Then, I distinguish three types of paternalism. I then examine under what conditions neutrality and paternalism can be compatible. Finally, I argue that neutrality of consequences, which seems to be the most demanding version of neutrality, is also compatible with paternalism and will conclude by suggesting that the only way to make paternalism and neutrality incompatible is to require that neutrality encompasses at the same time neutral justifications, aims, and consequences.Je défends dans cet article que le perfectionnisme libéral, même lorsque paternaliste, est toutefois compatible avec la neutralité de l’État. Je défends cette compatibilité de la manière suivante. Je distingue d’abord trois types de neutralité, puis trois types de paternalisme. Ensuite, j’examine sous quelles conditions la neutralité et le paternalisme peuvent être compatibles. Enfin, je défends que la neutralité des conséquences, qui me semble être la version la plus exigeante de la neutralité est, elle aussi, compatible avec le paternalisme et je termine en suggérant que la seule manière de rendre incompatibles le paternalisme et la neutralité consiste à exiger que la neutralité englobe à la fois la neutralité des justifications, des buts, et des conséquences.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionUniversidade do MinhoMerrill, Nathaniel Roberto Buil20112011-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1822/47734fraMerrill, R. (2011). Comment un État libéral peut-il être à la fois neutre et paternaliste ?. Raisons politiques, 44,(4), 15-40. doi:10.3917/rai.044.0015.1291-1941https://www.cairn.info/revue-raisons-politiques-2011-4-page-15.htminfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-21T12:37:17Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/47734Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T19:33:33.821798Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comment un État libéral peut-il être à la fois neutre et paternaliste?
How can the liberal State be neutral and paternalistic?
title Comment un État libéral peut-il être à la fois neutre et paternaliste?
spellingShingle Comment un État libéral peut-il être à la fois neutre et paternaliste?
Merrill, Nathaniel Roberto Buil
Neutrality
Liberalism
Perfectionism
Humanidades::Filosofia, Ética e Religião
title_short Comment un État libéral peut-il être à la fois neutre et paternaliste?
title_full Comment un État libéral peut-il être à la fois neutre et paternaliste?
title_fullStr Comment un État libéral peut-il être à la fois neutre et paternaliste?
title_full_unstemmed Comment un État libéral peut-il être à la fois neutre et paternaliste?
title_sort Comment un État libéral peut-il être à la fois neutre et paternaliste?
author Merrill, Nathaniel Roberto Buil
author_facet Merrill, Nathaniel Roberto Buil
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Minho
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Merrill, Nathaniel Roberto Buil
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Neutrality
Liberalism
Perfectionism
Humanidades::Filosofia, Ética e Religião
topic Neutrality
Liberalism
Perfectionism
Humanidades::Filosofia, Ética e Religião
description In this article I defend that liberal perfectionism, even when paternalistic, is compatible with state neutrality. I defend this compatibility as follows. First, I distinguish three types of neutrality. Then, I distinguish three types of paternalism. I then examine under what conditions neutrality and paternalism can be compatible. Finally, I argue that neutrality of consequences, which seems to be the most demanding version of neutrality, is also compatible with paternalism and will conclude by suggesting that the only way to make paternalism and neutrality incompatible is to require that neutrality encompasses at the same time neutral justifications, aims, and consequences.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011
2011-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/1822/47734
url http://hdl.handle.net/1822/47734
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv fra
language fra
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Merrill, R. (2011). Comment un État libéral peut-il être à la fois neutre et paternaliste ?. Raisons politiques, 44,(4), 15-40. doi:10.3917/rai.044.0015.
1291-1941
https://www.cairn.info/revue-raisons-politiques-2011-4-page-15.htm
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799132854030958592

Registros relacionados