Whose urn is it anyway? Discussions on decolonisation & repatriation efforts in the cultural heritage sector in Portugal

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ransick, Kelsey J. S.
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/29737
Resumo: Recent initiatives and reports, such as the Savoy–Sarr report in France, show some positive response among Western countries to the increasingly frequent calls for repatriating artefacts from museums, often as part of larger decolonisation efforts, although many of these calls still go unanswered. As this movement gains traction, the modern states of former empires and present-day hegemons, including Portugal, will face more legal, cultural, and ideological battles over the objects in their care. Thus, establishing guidelines for handling repatriation requests would be an acknowledgement of the power and importance of culture and increase Portugal’s soft power to make peace with the past and foster stronger international ties. This thesis analyses actors and arguments involved in public decolonisation and repatriation debates and efforts in the Portuguese cultural heritage sector. First, a brief history and contextualisation of decolonisation and repatriation efforts in museums situates Portugal within a larger movement to include previously excluded voices and perspectives. Then, the Portuguese context is specifically examined, considering the legacy of lusotropicalism and the ways Portugal has begun to reckon with its historical role in constructing and perpetuating the idea of race. Recent public debates reveal two outspoken camps in such polarising debates, with a notable absence of in-between voices, including rural and less formally educated Portuguese. Finally, a shared piece of cultural patrimony, the mortal remains of Dom Pedro I of Brazil (IV of Portugal), shows the potential difficulty in determining ownership and dominance in the relationship between empires and their former colonies.
id RCAP_a473c426d5b74699732d216f2ca8e1b2
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/29737
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Whose urn is it anyway? Discussions on decolonisation & repatriation efforts in the cultural heritage sector in PortugalRepatriationPatrimónio cultural -- Cultural heritageMuseu -- MuseumDescolonização -- DecolonizationLusotropicalismo -- LusotropicalismRacismo -- RacismRepatriamentoRecent initiatives and reports, such as the Savoy–Sarr report in France, show some positive response among Western countries to the increasingly frequent calls for repatriating artefacts from museums, often as part of larger decolonisation efforts, although many of these calls still go unanswered. As this movement gains traction, the modern states of former empires and present-day hegemons, including Portugal, will face more legal, cultural, and ideological battles over the objects in their care. Thus, establishing guidelines for handling repatriation requests would be an acknowledgement of the power and importance of culture and increase Portugal’s soft power to make peace with the past and foster stronger international ties. This thesis analyses actors and arguments involved in public decolonisation and repatriation debates and efforts in the Portuguese cultural heritage sector. First, a brief history and contextualisation of decolonisation and repatriation efforts in museums situates Portugal within a larger movement to include previously excluded voices and perspectives. Then, the Portuguese context is specifically examined, considering the legacy of lusotropicalism and the ways Portugal has begun to reckon with its historical role in constructing and perpetuating the idea of race. Recent public debates reveal two outspoken camps in such polarising debates, with a notable absence of in-between voices, including rural and less formally educated Portuguese. Finally, a shared piece of cultural patrimony, the mortal remains of Dom Pedro I of Brazil (IV of Portugal), shows the potential difficulty in determining ownership and dominance in the relationship between empires and their former colonies.Iniciativas e relatórios recentes mostram algumas respostas positivas por parte dos países Ocidentais aos crescentes pedidos de repatriação de artefactos de museu, que vêm associados a esforços de descolonização mais abrangentes. Enquanto este movimento cresce, os estados modernos de antigos impérios e hegemons atuais, incluindo Portugal, irão enfrentar mais batalhas legais, culturais e ideológicas acerca dos objetos que estão debaixo do seu cuidado. Assim, o estabelecimento de orientações para lidar com pedidos de repatriação representaria um reconhecimento da importância da cultura e aumentaria o soft power de Portugal, mostrando a sua capacidade de fazer paz com o passado e de nutrir laços internacionais mais fortes. Esta tese analisa os atores e argumentos envolvidos nos debates e esforços públicos de descolonização e de repatriação dentro do setor português de herança cultural. Uma contextualização dos esforços de descolonização e repatriação nos museus situa Portugal dentro de um movimento maior para incluir vozes anteriormente excluídas. Esta tese analisa especificamente o contexto português, considerando o legado do luso-tropicalismo e as formas como Portugal tem começado a lidar com o seu papel histórico na construção e perpetuação da ideia de raça. Debates públicos, recentes, e polarizantes revelam dois campos proeminentes, com uma ausência notável de vozes intermédias, incluindo de portugueses com menor educação formal e provenientes de zonas rurais. Finalmente, um pedaço partilhado de património cultural, os restos mortais de Dom Pedro I do Brasil, mostra a potencial dificuldade em determinar a pertença e a dominância na relação entre impérios e as antigas colónias.2023-11-23T15:30:59Z2023-10-11T00:00:00Z2023-10-112023-08info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/29737TID:203390857engRansick, Kelsey J. S.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-26T01:17:50Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/29737Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T23:19:45.591217Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Whose urn is it anyway? Discussions on decolonisation & repatriation efforts in the cultural heritage sector in Portugal
title Whose urn is it anyway? Discussions on decolonisation & repatriation efforts in the cultural heritage sector in Portugal
spellingShingle Whose urn is it anyway? Discussions on decolonisation & repatriation efforts in the cultural heritage sector in Portugal
Ransick, Kelsey J. S.
Repatriation
Património cultural -- Cultural heritage
Museu -- Museum
Descolonização -- Decolonization
Lusotropicalismo -- Lusotropicalism
Racismo -- Racism
Repatriamento
title_short Whose urn is it anyway? Discussions on decolonisation & repatriation efforts in the cultural heritage sector in Portugal
title_full Whose urn is it anyway? Discussions on decolonisation & repatriation efforts in the cultural heritage sector in Portugal
title_fullStr Whose urn is it anyway? Discussions on decolonisation & repatriation efforts in the cultural heritage sector in Portugal
title_full_unstemmed Whose urn is it anyway? Discussions on decolonisation & repatriation efforts in the cultural heritage sector in Portugal
title_sort Whose urn is it anyway? Discussions on decolonisation & repatriation efforts in the cultural heritage sector in Portugal
author Ransick, Kelsey J. S.
author_facet Ransick, Kelsey J. S.
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ransick, Kelsey J. S.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Repatriation
Património cultural -- Cultural heritage
Museu -- Museum
Descolonização -- Decolonization
Lusotropicalismo -- Lusotropicalism
Racismo -- Racism
Repatriamento
topic Repatriation
Património cultural -- Cultural heritage
Museu -- Museum
Descolonização -- Decolonization
Lusotropicalismo -- Lusotropicalism
Racismo -- Racism
Repatriamento
description Recent initiatives and reports, such as the Savoy–Sarr report in France, show some positive response among Western countries to the increasingly frequent calls for repatriating artefacts from museums, often as part of larger decolonisation efforts, although many of these calls still go unanswered. As this movement gains traction, the modern states of former empires and present-day hegemons, including Portugal, will face more legal, cultural, and ideological battles over the objects in their care. Thus, establishing guidelines for handling repatriation requests would be an acknowledgement of the power and importance of culture and increase Portugal’s soft power to make peace with the past and foster stronger international ties. This thesis analyses actors and arguments involved in public decolonisation and repatriation debates and efforts in the Portuguese cultural heritage sector. First, a brief history and contextualisation of decolonisation and repatriation efforts in museums situates Portugal within a larger movement to include previously excluded voices and perspectives. Then, the Portuguese context is specifically examined, considering the legacy of lusotropicalism and the ways Portugal has begun to reckon with its historical role in constructing and perpetuating the idea of race. Recent public debates reveal two outspoken camps in such polarising debates, with a notable absence of in-between voices, including rural and less formally educated Portuguese. Finally, a shared piece of cultural patrimony, the mortal remains of Dom Pedro I of Brazil (IV of Portugal), shows the potential difficulty in determining ownership and dominance in the relationship between empires and their former colonies.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-11-23T15:30:59Z
2023-10-11T00:00:00Z
2023-10-11
2023-08
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10071/29737
TID:203390857
url http://hdl.handle.net/10071/29737
identifier_str_mv TID:203390857
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799135496303017984