Things We Lost in the Fire: Eu Constitutionalism After Brexit

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Martins, Patrícia Fragoso
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.34632/catolicalawreview.2018.1997
Resumo: It is said that Brexit is irreversible. The perspective of withdrawal by the United Kingdom of the European Union represents the most significant institutional challenge for the European project. It is feared that withdrawal dramatically changes the nature of European integration. Article 50 TEU is, as a rule, considered to be an emblematic manifestation of the intergovernmental nature of EU cooperation, contrasting with the trend towards a more perfect form of federal integration. Yet the exact legal and political consequences flowing from Brexit remain unknown. In any case, it is clear that the process involves more than the loss of one Member State. The trust on an ever-growing project grounded on the socalled “spill-over” effects seems compromised. Notwithstanding, at the same time, Brexit represents a unique opportunity for the affirmation of the core values of EU constitutionalism. The purpose of this paper is to reflect on how withdrawal reinforces the constitutional nature of the Union under whose lens it necessarily needs to be assessed and negotiated.
id RCAP_a5357e196b36f83966c7ccc34a9c705b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/1997
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Things We Lost in the Fire: Eu Constitutionalism After BrexitIt is said that Brexit is irreversible. The perspective of withdrawal by the United Kingdom of the European Union represents the most significant institutional challenge for the European project. It is feared that withdrawal dramatically changes the nature of European integration. Article 50 TEU is, as a rule, considered to be an emblematic manifestation of the intergovernmental nature of EU cooperation, contrasting with the trend towards a more perfect form of federal integration. Yet the exact legal and political consequences flowing from Brexit remain unknown. In any case, it is clear that the process involves more than the loss of one Member State. The trust on an ever-growing project grounded on the socalled “spill-over” effects seems compromised. Notwithstanding, at the same time, Brexit represents a unique opportunity for the affirmation of the core values of EU constitutionalism. The purpose of this paper is to reflect on how withdrawal reinforces the constitutional nature of the Union under whose lens it necessarily needs to be assessed and negotiated.Tem-se dito que o Brexit é irreversível. A perspetiva da saída do Reino Unido da União Europeia representa o desafio institucional mais significativo de sempre para o projeto europeu. Neste âmbito, teme-se que a saída represente uma alteração dramática da natureza da integração europeia. Na verdade, o artigo 50.º do TUE é, em regra, considerado uma manifestação emblemática da natureza intergovernamental da cooperação europeia, em contraste com a tendência para uma forma mais perfeita de integração federal. Sem prejuízo, as exatas consequências políticas e jurídicas do Brexit são ainda desconhecidas. Certo que o processo envolve mais do que a perda de um Estado-membro. A crença num projeto sempre crescente, fundado nos chamados efeitos «spill-over», parece comprometida. Não obstante, importa notar que, ao mesmo tempo, o Brexit representa uma oportunidade única para a afirmação dos valores centrais do constitucionalismo europeu. Neste contexto, o propósito deste artigo é refletir na forma como a saída de um Estado-membro reforça a natureza constitucional da União sob a lente da qual tem, necessariamente, de ser entendida e negociada.Universidade Católica Portuguesa2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.34632/catolicalawreview.2018.1997https://doi.org/10.34632/catolicalawreview.2018.1997Católica Law Review; Vol 2 No 1 (2018): Public law; 77-94Católica Law Review; v. 2 n. 1 (2018): Direito público; 77-942184-03342183-933610.34632/catolicalawreview.2018.2.1reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/catolicalawreview/article/view/1997https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/catolicalawreview/article/view/1997/1920Direitos de Autor (c) 2018 Patrícia Fragoso Martinshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMartins, Patrícia Fragoso2023-10-03T15:41:09Zoai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/1997Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:32:46.471006Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Things We Lost in the Fire: Eu Constitutionalism After Brexit
title Things We Lost in the Fire: Eu Constitutionalism After Brexit
spellingShingle Things We Lost in the Fire: Eu Constitutionalism After Brexit
Martins, Patrícia Fragoso
title_short Things We Lost in the Fire: Eu Constitutionalism After Brexit
title_full Things We Lost in the Fire: Eu Constitutionalism After Brexit
title_fullStr Things We Lost in the Fire: Eu Constitutionalism After Brexit
title_full_unstemmed Things We Lost in the Fire: Eu Constitutionalism After Brexit
title_sort Things We Lost in the Fire: Eu Constitutionalism After Brexit
author Martins, Patrícia Fragoso
author_facet Martins, Patrícia Fragoso
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Martins, Patrícia Fragoso
description It is said that Brexit is irreversible. The perspective of withdrawal by the United Kingdom of the European Union represents the most significant institutional challenge for the European project. It is feared that withdrawal dramatically changes the nature of European integration. Article 50 TEU is, as a rule, considered to be an emblematic manifestation of the intergovernmental nature of EU cooperation, contrasting with the trend towards a more perfect form of federal integration. Yet the exact legal and political consequences flowing from Brexit remain unknown. In any case, it is clear that the process involves more than the loss of one Member State. The trust on an ever-growing project grounded on the socalled “spill-over” effects seems compromised. Notwithstanding, at the same time, Brexit represents a unique opportunity for the affirmation of the core values of EU constitutionalism. The purpose of this paper is to reflect on how withdrawal reinforces the constitutional nature of the Union under whose lens it necessarily needs to be assessed and negotiated.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-01-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.34632/catolicalawreview.2018.1997
https://doi.org/10.34632/catolicalawreview.2018.1997
url https://doi.org/10.34632/catolicalawreview.2018.1997
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/catolicalawreview/article/view/1997
https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/catolicalawreview/article/view/1997/1920
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2018 Patrícia Fragoso Martins
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2018 Patrícia Fragoso Martins
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Católica Portuguesa
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Católica Portuguesa
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Católica Law Review; Vol 2 No 1 (2018): Public law; 77-94
Católica Law Review; v. 2 n. 1 (2018): Direito público; 77-94
2184-0334
2183-9336
10.34632/catolicalawreview.2018.2.1
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133593635651584