The Unity of Global Administrative Law
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2183-184X2016000300006 |
Resumo: | In this article, I offer an account of the unity of the emerging Global Administrative Law. I do so by setting out an understanding - and justification - of each of the terms in the name, specifying the conditions under which GAL can plausibly be thought of as global, administrative and legal in nature. My central claim is that the key to unlocking these mysteries lies in the relation of GAL to the notion of legitimacy. My argument proceeds as follows. I begin by laying down the account of legitimacy that I rely on in the rest of the piece. I then outline a set of assumptions about GAL, and the implications of the account of legitimacy for those assumptions. This provides us with a statement of the conditions of possibility and success for a fully-emerged Global Administrative Law. I then sketch how framing the field in terms of its relation to legitimacy helps us to see how the use of each of the terms in the name was justified, by giving an account of the objects, nature and scope of GAL; and conclude with some reflections on what this might mean for its unity if and when it finally emerges. |
id |
RCAP_a6d382de0ff48524cbdeaf1e4245674e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S2183-184X2016000300006 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
The Unity of Global Administrative LawGlobal Administrative LawlegitimacyHohfeldlibertyglobal governanceadministrationpublic authorityIn this article, I offer an account of the unity of the emerging Global Administrative Law. I do so by setting out an understanding - and justification - of each of the terms in the name, specifying the conditions under which GAL can plausibly be thought of as global, administrative and legal in nature. My central claim is that the key to unlocking these mysteries lies in the relation of GAL to the notion of legitimacy. My argument proceeds as follows. I begin by laying down the account of legitimacy that I rely on in the rest of the piece. I then outline a set of assumptions about GAL, and the implications of the account of legitimacy for those assumptions. This provides us with a statement of the conditions of possibility and success for a fully-emerged Global Administrative Law. I then sketch how framing the field in terms of its relation to legitimacy helps us to see how the use of each of the terms in the name was justified, by giving an account of the objects, nature and scope of GAL; and conclude with some reflections on what this might mean for its unity if and when it finally emerges.Instituto de Ciências Jurídico-Políticas (Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Lisboa)2016-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2183-184X2016000300006e-Pública: Revista Eletrónica de Direito Público v.3 n.3 2016reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2183-184X2016000300006Macdonald,Euaninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-02-06T17:29:43Zoai:scielo:S2183-184X2016000300006Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T02:33:32.238867Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Unity of Global Administrative Law |
title |
The Unity of Global Administrative Law |
spellingShingle |
The Unity of Global Administrative Law Macdonald,Euan Global Administrative Law legitimacy Hohfeld liberty global governance administration public authority |
title_short |
The Unity of Global Administrative Law |
title_full |
The Unity of Global Administrative Law |
title_fullStr |
The Unity of Global Administrative Law |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Unity of Global Administrative Law |
title_sort |
The Unity of Global Administrative Law |
author |
Macdonald,Euan |
author_facet |
Macdonald,Euan |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Macdonald,Euan |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Global Administrative Law legitimacy Hohfeld liberty global governance administration public authority |
topic |
Global Administrative Law legitimacy Hohfeld liberty global governance administration public authority |
description |
In this article, I offer an account of the unity of the emerging Global Administrative Law. I do so by setting out an understanding - and justification - of each of the terms in the name, specifying the conditions under which GAL can plausibly be thought of as global, administrative and legal in nature. My central claim is that the key to unlocking these mysteries lies in the relation of GAL to the notion of legitimacy. My argument proceeds as follows. I begin by laying down the account of legitimacy that I rely on in the rest of the piece. I then outline a set of assumptions about GAL, and the implications of the account of legitimacy for those assumptions. This provides us with a statement of the conditions of possibility and success for a fully-emerged Global Administrative Law. I then sketch how framing the field in terms of its relation to legitimacy helps us to see how the use of each of the terms in the name was justified, by giving an account of the objects, nature and scope of GAL; and conclude with some reflections on what this might mean for its unity if and when it finally emerges. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-12-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2183-184X2016000300006 |
url |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2183-184X2016000300006 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2183-184X2016000300006 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Ciências Jurídico-Políticas (Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Lisboa) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Ciências Jurídico-Políticas (Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Lisboa) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
e-Pública: Revista Eletrónica de Direito Público v.3 n.3 2016 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799137394042077184 |