Administrative self-regulation (“Innenrecht”) and Global Administrative Law

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Krämer,Rike U.
Data de Publicação: 2015
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2183-184X2015000300006
Resumo: A new category of “law” is developing, Global Administrative Law (GAL). The goal of this new strand of literature is to capture and embed the discourse about global governance and bring it into the legal realm. One controversially debated question is whether all of these new phenomena categorised as global governance can be called proper law. This paper uses the concept of law developed by Benedict Kingsbury as well as the German administrative law concept to shed some light on the question of validity and weight. Kingsbury distinguishes between these two categories. In contrast, German administrative law distinguishes between internal law (only “law” in exceptional cases but weight attached) and external law (law in the proper sense). A comparison between Kingsbury's concept of law for GAL and the German approach can therefore enhance our understanding of law in the global space.
id RCAP_0a54808f1329ec649ad46783f4060b74
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2183-184X2015000300006
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Administrative self-regulation (“Innenrecht”) and Global Administrative LawGlobal Administrative Lawconcept of lawVerwaltungsvorschriftenInnenrechtwaste managementA new category of “law” is developing, Global Administrative Law (GAL). The goal of this new strand of literature is to capture and embed the discourse about global governance and bring it into the legal realm. One controversially debated question is whether all of these new phenomena categorised as global governance can be called proper law. This paper uses the concept of law developed by Benedict Kingsbury as well as the German administrative law concept to shed some light on the question of validity and weight. Kingsbury distinguishes between these two categories. In contrast, German administrative law distinguishes between internal law (only “law” in exceptional cases but weight attached) and external law (law in the proper sense). A comparison between Kingsbury's concept of law for GAL and the German approach can therefore enhance our understanding of law in the global space.Instituto de Ciências Jurídico-Políticas (Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Lisboa)2015-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2183-184X2015000300006e-Pública: Revista Eletrónica de Direito Público v.2 n.3 2015reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2183-184X2015000300006Krämer,Rike U.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-02-06T17:29:40Zoai:scielo:S2183-184X2015000300006Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T02:33:30.154014Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Administrative self-regulation (“Innenrecht”) and Global Administrative Law
title Administrative self-regulation (“Innenrecht”) and Global Administrative Law
spellingShingle Administrative self-regulation (“Innenrecht”) and Global Administrative Law
Krämer,Rike U.
Global Administrative Law
concept of law
Verwaltungsvorschriften
Innenrecht
waste management
title_short Administrative self-regulation (“Innenrecht”) and Global Administrative Law
title_full Administrative self-regulation (“Innenrecht”) and Global Administrative Law
title_fullStr Administrative self-regulation (“Innenrecht”) and Global Administrative Law
title_full_unstemmed Administrative self-regulation (“Innenrecht”) and Global Administrative Law
title_sort Administrative self-regulation (“Innenrecht”) and Global Administrative Law
author Krämer,Rike U.
author_facet Krämer,Rike U.
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Krämer,Rike U.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Global Administrative Law
concept of law
Verwaltungsvorschriften
Innenrecht
waste management
topic Global Administrative Law
concept of law
Verwaltungsvorschriften
Innenrecht
waste management
description A new category of “law” is developing, Global Administrative Law (GAL). The goal of this new strand of literature is to capture and embed the discourse about global governance and bring it into the legal realm. One controversially debated question is whether all of these new phenomena categorised as global governance can be called proper law. This paper uses the concept of law developed by Benedict Kingsbury as well as the German administrative law concept to shed some light on the question of validity and weight. Kingsbury distinguishes between these two categories. In contrast, German administrative law distinguishes between internal law (only “law” in exceptional cases but weight attached) and external law (law in the proper sense). A comparison between Kingsbury's concept of law for GAL and the German approach can therefore enhance our understanding of law in the global space.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-12-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2183-184X2015000300006
url http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2183-184X2015000300006
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2183-184X2015000300006
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Ciências Jurídico-Políticas (Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Lisboa)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Ciências Jurídico-Políticas (Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Lisboa)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv e-Pública: Revista Eletrónica de Direito Público v.2 n.3 2015
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137393574412288

Registros relacionados