Guest Editors’ Introduction: Is the HRM process important? Past, current, and future challenges

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sanders, Karin
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Shipton, Shipton, Gomes, Jorge F. S.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/25037
Resumo: Ten years ago, Bowen and Ostroff (2004) criticized the one-sided focus on the content-based approach, where researchers take into account the inherent virtues (or vices) associated with the content of HR practices to explain performance. They explicitly highlight the role of the psychological processes through which employees attach meaning to HRM. In this first article of the special section entitled “Is the HRM Process Important?” we present an overview of past, current, and future challenges. For past challenges, we attempt to categorize the various research streams that originated from the seminal piece. To outline current challenges, we present the results of a content analysis of the original 15 articles put forward for the special section. In addition, we provide the overview of a caucus focused on this theme that was held at the Academy of Management annual meeting in Boston in 2012. In conclusion, we discuss future challenges relating to the HRM process approach and review the contributions that have been selected—against a competitive field—for this special issue.
id RCAP_a70b04e4cbefc816ba79a98b748e5eba
oai_identifier_str oai:www.repository.utl.pt:10400.5/25037
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Guest Editors’ Introduction: Is the HRM process important? Past, current, and future challengesHRM ProcessAttribution TheoryEmployee PerceptionsTen years ago, Bowen and Ostroff (2004) criticized the one-sided focus on the content-based approach, where researchers take into account the inherent virtues (or vices) associated with the content of HR practices to explain performance. They explicitly highlight the role of the psychological processes through which employees attach meaning to HRM. In this first article of the special section entitled “Is the HRM Process Important?” we present an overview of past, current, and future challenges. For past challenges, we attempt to categorize the various research streams that originated from the seminal piece. To outline current challenges, we present the results of a content analysis of the original 15 articles put forward for the special section. In addition, we provide the overview of a caucus focused on this theme that was held at the Academy of Management annual meeting in Boston in 2012. In conclusion, we discuss future challenges relating to the HRM process approach and review the contributions that have been selected—against a competitive field—for this special issue.John Wiley & SonsRepositório da Universidade de LisboaSanders, KarinShipton, ShiptonGomes, Jorge F. S.2022-07-28T11:07:19Z20142014-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/25037engSanders, Karin Helen Shipton and Jorge F. S. Gomes. (2014). “Guest Editors’ Introduction: Is the HRM process important? Past, current, and future challenges”. Human Resource Management, Vol. 53, No. 4: pp. 489-503.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-03-06T14:54:39Zoai:www.repository.utl.pt:10400.5/25037Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:08:59.542342Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Guest Editors’ Introduction: Is the HRM process important? Past, current, and future challenges
title Guest Editors’ Introduction: Is the HRM process important? Past, current, and future challenges
spellingShingle Guest Editors’ Introduction: Is the HRM process important? Past, current, and future challenges
Sanders, Karin
HRM Process
Attribution Theory
Employee Perceptions
title_short Guest Editors’ Introduction: Is the HRM process important? Past, current, and future challenges
title_full Guest Editors’ Introduction: Is the HRM process important? Past, current, and future challenges
title_fullStr Guest Editors’ Introduction: Is the HRM process important? Past, current, and future challenges
title_full_unstemmed Guest Editors’ Introduction: Is the HRM process important? Past, current, and future challenges
title_sort Guest Editors’ Introduction: Is the HRM process important? Past, current, and future challenges
author Sanders, Karin
author_facet Sanders, Karin
Shipton, Shipton
Gomes, Jorge F. S.
author_role author
author2 Shipton, Shipton
Gomes, Jorge F. S.
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sanders, Karin
Shipton, Shipton
Gomes, Jorge F. S.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv HRM Process
Attribution Theory
Employee Perceptions
topic HRM Process
Attribution Theory
Employee Perceptions
description Ten years ago, Bowen and Ostroff (2004) criticized the one-sided focus on the content-based approach, where researchers take into account the inherent virtues (or vices) associated with the content of HR practices to explain performance. They explicitly highlight the role of the psychological processes through which employees attach meaning to HRM. In this first article of the special section entitled “Is the HRM Process Important?” we present an overview of past, current, and future challenges. For past challenges, we attempt to categorize the various research streams that originated from the seminal piece. To outline current challenges, we present the results of a content analysis of the original 15 articles put forward for the special section. In addition, we provide the overview of a caucus focused on this theme that was held at the Academy of Management annual meeting in Boston in 2012. In conclusion, we discuss future challenges relating to the HRM process approach and review the contributions that have been selected—against a competitive field—for this special issue.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014
2014-01-01T00:00:00Z
2022-07-28T11:07:19Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/25037
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/25037
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Sanders, Karin Helen Shipton and Jorge F. S. Gomes. (2014). “Guest Editors’ Introduction: Is the HRM process important? Past, current, and future challenges”. Human Resource Management, Vol. 53, No. 4: pp. 489-503.
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv John Wiley & Sons
publisher.none.fl_str_mv John Wiley & Sons
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131184103424000