Laparoscopic versus Robotic gastric cancer surgery: Short-term Outcomes. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 25 521 patients

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pedro Felgueiras Loureiro
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/150270
Resumo: Background: Gastric cancer has the third highest cancer-related mortality worldwide. There is no consensus regarding the optimal surgical technique to perform curative resection surgery. Objective: Compare laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy regarding short-term outcomes in patients with gastric cancer. Materials and Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. We searched the following topics: "Gastrectomy", "Laparoscopic" and "Robotic Surgical Procedures". The included studies compared short-term outcomes between laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy. Individual risk of bias was assessed with the MINORS scale. Results: There were no significant differences between robotic gastrectomy (RG) and laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) regarding conversion rate, reoperation rate, mortality, overall complications, anastomotic leakage, distal and proximal resection margin distances, and recurrence rate. However, mean blood loss (mean difference - MD - -19.43 mL, p<0.00001), length of stay (MD -0.50 days, p=0.0007), time to first flatus (MD -0.52 days, p<0.00001), time to oral intake (MD -0.17 days, p=0.0001), surgical complications with a Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III (relative risk - RR - 0.68, p<0.0001), and pancreatic complications (RR 0.51, p=0.007) were significatively lower in the RG group. Furthermore, the number of retrieved lymph nodes was significantly higher in the RG group. Nevertheless, the RG group showed a significantly higher operation time (MD 41.19 min, p<0.00001) and cost (MD 3684.27 US Dollars, p<0.00001). Conclusion: This meta-analysis supports the choice of robotic surgery over laparoscopy concerning relevant surgical complications. However, longer operation time and higher cost remain crucial limitations. Randomized clinical trials are required to clarify the advantages and disadvantages of RG.
id RCAP_a85f1c5ac6e84b744820cb7eb38c19d5
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/150270
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Laparoscopic versus Robotic gastric cancer surgery: Short-term Outcomes. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 25 521 patientsCiências médicas e da saúdeMedical and Health sciencesBackground: Gastric cancer has the third highest cancer-related mortality worldwide. There is no consensus regarding the optimal surgical technique to perform curative resection surgery. Objective: Compare laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy regarding short-term outcomes in patients with gastric cancer. Materials and Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. We searched the following topics: "Gastrectomy", "Laparoscopic" and "Robotic Surgical Procedures". The included studies compared short-term outcomes between laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy. Individual risk of bias was assessed with the MINORS scale. Results: There were no significant differences between robotic gastrectomy (RG) and laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) regarding conversion rate, reoperation rate, mortality, overall complications, anastomotic leakage, distal and proximal resection margin distances, and recurrence rate. However, mean blood loss (mean difference - MD - -19.43 mL, p<0.00001), length of stay (MD -0.50 days, p=0.0007), time to first flatus (MD -0.52 days, p<0.00001), time to oral intake (MD -0.17 days, p=0.0001), surgical complications with a Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III (relative risk - RR - 0.68, p<0.0001), and pancreatic complications (RR 0.51, p=0.007) were significatively lower in the RG group. Furthermore, the number of retrieved lymph nodes was significantly higher in the RG group. Nevertheless, the RG group showed a significantly higher operation time (MD 41.19 min, p<0.00001) and cost (MD 3684.27 US Dollars, p<0.00001). Conclusion: This meta-analysis supports the choice of robotic surgery over laparoscopy concerning relevant surgical complications. However, longer operation time and higher cost remain crucial limitations. Randomized clinical trials are required to clarify the advantages and disadvantages of RG.2023-05-252023-05-25T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/10216/150270TID:203523040engPedro Felgueiras Loureiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-02-16T01:23:34Zoai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/150270Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T23:53:55.534765Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Laparoscopic versus Robotic gastric cancer surgery: Short-term Outcomes. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 25 521 patients
title Laparoscopic versus Robotic gastric cancer surgery: Short-term Outcomes. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 25 521 patients
spellingShingle Laparoscopic versus Robotic gastric cancer surgery: Short-term Outcomes. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 25 521 patients
Pedro Felgueiras Loureiro
Ciências médicas e da saúde
Medical and Health sciences
title_short Laparoscopic versus Robotic gastric cancer surgery: Short-term Outcomes. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 25 521 patients
title_full Laparoscopic versus Robotic gastric cancer surgery: Short-term Outcomes. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 25 521 patients
title_fullStr Laparoscopic versus Robotic gastric cancer surgery: Short-term Outcomes. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 25 521 patients
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic versus Robotic gastric cancer surgery: Short-term Outcomes. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 25 521 patients
title_sort Laparoscopic versus Robotic gastric cancer surgery: Short-term Outcomes. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 25 521 patients
author Pedro Felgueiras Loureiro
author_facet Pedro Felgueiras Loureiro
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pedro Felgueiras Loureiro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ciências médicas e da saúde
Medical and Health sciences
topic Ciências médicas e da saúde
Medical and Health sciences
description Background: Gastric cancer has the third highest cancer-related mortality worldwide. There is no consensus regarding the optimal surgical technique to perform curative resection surgery. Objective: Compare laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy regarding short-term outcomes in patients with gastric cancer. Materials and Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. We searched the following topics: "Gastrectomy", "Laparoscopic" and "Robotic Surgical Procedures". The included studies compared short-term outcomes between laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy. Individual risk of bias was assessed with the MINORS scale. Results: There were no significant differences between robotic gastrectomy (RG) and laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) regarding conversion rate, reoperation rate, mortality, overall complications, anastomotic leakage, distal and proximal resection margin distances, and recurrence rate. However, mean blood loss (mean difference - MD - -19.43 mL, p<0.00001), length of stay (MD -0.50 days, p=0.0007), time to first flatus (MD -0.52 days, p<0.00001), time to oral intake (MD -0.17 days, p=0.0001), surgical complications with a Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III (relative risk - RR - 0.68, p<0.0001), and pancreatic complications (RR 0.51, p=0.007) were significatively lower in the RG group. Furthermore, the number of retrieved lymph nodes was significantly higher in the RG group. Nevertheless, the RG group showed a significantly higher operation time (MD 41.19 min, p<0.00001) and cost (MD 3684.27 US Dollars, p<0.00001). Conclusion: This meta-analysis supports the choice of robotic surgery over laparoscopy concerning relevant surgical complications. However, longer operation time and higher cost remain crucial limitations. Randomized clinical trials are required to clarify the advantages and disadvantages of RG.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-05-25
2023-05-25T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10216/150270
TID:203523040
url https://hdl.handle.net/10216/150270
identifier_str_mv TID:203523040
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799135859126042625