Vaccine Hesitancy in Measles-Rubella Campaign in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Barathy, Chandrasegaran
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Prabha, Siva, Babji, Shivaramakrishna, Kittu, Devi, Bairavi, Manju, Sriram , Pothapregada
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.25754/pjp.2022.22083
Resumo: Introduction and Objectives: The Government of India conducted a mass measles-rubella (MR) vaccination phase-1 campaign (2017) in five states/union territories. However, this campaign had met with resistance from the public with several rumours circulating on media. The present study was conducted to know the perception of parents regarding MR vaccine, reasons for the vaccine hesitancy, and information sources used to make decisions regarding vaccination. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 425 children. Parents/caretakers of every fifth child were interviewed using a pretested semi-structured standardized questionnaire adapted from the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) working model after written consent. Reasons for vaccine hesitancy were considered as the outcome variables. Descriptive statistics were used for calculating frequencies. Chi square test was used for comparing the variables between vaccine compliant and vaccine-hesitant groups; P <0.05 was considered significant. Results: Among 425 informants, 178 (41.8%) refused the vaccine initially. Only 149 (83.7%) reported fear of side effects as the reason for initial vaccine hesitancy. Vaccine hesitancy had stemmed from the fear of side effects following immunization, which was generated from the wrong information circulated in social media, television, and by word of mouth from the neighbours. Reassurance through interpersonal communication by school authorities and health care professionals led to improved vaccine acceptance. Conclusion: Vaccine hesitancy stemming from the fear of side effects was generated by the wrong information, which was circulated in the social media and television about children getting hospitalized after MR vaccine.
id RCAP_a9502adc0ffa69dcd8552db5fbf57f27
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/22083
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Vaccine Hesitancy in Measles-Rubella Campaign in a Tertiary Care HospitalOriginal articlesIntroduction and Objectives: The Government of India conducted a mass measles-rubella (MR) vaccination phase-1 campaign (2017) in five states/union territories. However, this campaign had met with resistance from the public with several rumours circulating on media. The present study was conducted to know the perception of parents regarding MR vaccine, reasons for the vaccine hesitancy, and information sources used to make decisions regarding vaccination. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 425 children. Parents/caretakers of every fifth child were interviewed using a pretested semi-structured standardized questionnaire adapted from the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) working model after written consent. Reasons for vaccine hesitancy were considered as the outcome variables. Descriptive statistics were used for calculating frequencies. Chi square test was used for comparing the variables between vaccine compliant and vaccine-hesitant groups; P <0.05 was considered significant. Results: Among 425 informants, 178 (41.8%) refused the vaccine initially. Only 149 (83.7%) reported fear of side effects as the reason for initial vaccine hesitancy. Vaccine hesitancy had stemmed from the fear of side effects following immunization, which was generated from the wrong information circulated in social media, television, and by word of mouth from the neighbours. Reassurance through interpersonal communication by school authorities and health care professionals led to improved vaccine acceptance. Conclusion: Vaccine hesitancy stemming from the fear of side effects was generated by the wrong information, which was circulated in the social media and television about children getting hospitalized after MR vaccine.Sociedade Portuguesa de Pediatria2022-01-24info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://doi.org/10.25754/pjp.2022.22083eng2184-44532184-3333Barathy, ChandrasegaranPrabha, SivaBabji, ShivaramakrishnaKittu, DeviBairavi, ManjuSriram , Pothapregadainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-08-03T02:58:15Zoai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/22083Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:25:37.410984Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Vaccine Hesitancy in Measles-Rubella Campaign in a Tertiary Care Hospital
title Vaccine Hesitancy in Measles-Rubella Campaign in a Tertiary Care Hospital
spellingShingle Vaccine Hesitancy in Measles-Rubella Campaign in a Tertiary Care Hospital
Barathy, Chandrasegaran
Original articles
title_short Vaccine Hesitancy in Measles-Rubella Campaign in a Tertiary Care Hospital
title_full Vaccine Hesitancy in Measles-Rubella Campaign in a Tertiary Care Hospital
title_fullStr Vaccine Hesitancy in Measles-Rubella Campaign in a Tertiary Care Hospital
title_full_unstemmed Vaccine Hesitancy in Measles-Rubella Campaign in a Tertiary Care Hospital
title_sort Vaccine Hesitancy in Measles-Rubella Campaign in a Tertiary Care Hospital
author Barathy, Chandrasegaran
author_facet Barathy, Chandrasegaran
Prabha, Siva
Babji, Shivaramakrishna
Kittu, Devi
Bairavi, Manju
Sriram , Pothapregada
author_role author
author2 Prabha, Siva
Babji, Shivaramakrishna
Kittu, Devi
Bairavi, Manju
Sriram , Pothapregada
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Barathy, Chandrasegaran
Prabha, Siva
Babji, Shivaramakrishna
Kittu, Devi
Bairavi, Manju
Sriram , Pothapregada
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Original articles
topic Original articles
description Introduction and Objectives: The Government of India conducted a mass measles-rubella (MR) vaccination phase-1 campaign (2017) in five states/union territories. However, this campaign had met with resistance from the public with several rumours circulating on media. The present study was conducted to know the perception of parents regarding MR vaccine, reasons for the vaccine hesitancy, and information sources used to make decisions regarding vaccination. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 425 children. Parents/caretakers of every fifth child were interviewed using a pretested semi-structured standardized questionnaire adapted from the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) working model after written consent. Reasons for vaccine hesitancy were considered as the outcome variables. Descriptive statistics were used for calculating frequencies. Chi square test was used for comparing the variables between vaccine compliant and vaccine-hesitant groups; P <0.05 was considered significant. Results: Among 425 informants, 178 (41.8%) refused the vaccine initially. Only 149 (83.7%) reported fear of side effects as the reason for initial vaccine hesitancy. Vaccine hesitancy had stemmed from the fear of side effects following immunization, which was generated from the wrong information circulated in social media, television, and by word of mouth from the neighbours. Reassurance through interpersonal communication by school authorities and health care professionals led to improved vaccine acceptance. Conclusion: Vaccine hesitancy stemming from the fear of side effects was generated by the wrong information, which was circulated in the social media and television about children getting hospitalized after MR vaccine.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-24
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.25754/pjp.2022.22083
url https://doi.org/10.25754/pjp.2022.22083
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2184-4453
2184-3333
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Pediatria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Pediatria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133524914077696