The European Union's 'potential We' between acceptance and contestation: assessing the positioning of six eastern partnership countries*
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/1822/67678 |
Resumo: | The present contribution analyses the European neighbourhood policy and the Eastern Partnership (EaP), which celebrated its tenth anniversary in 2019, from the perspective of social identity theory. It is argued that the evolution of both the European neighbourhood policy and the EaP corresponds to the emergence of a distinct EU identity: its 'potential we', which has been defying the Russian 'significant we' extended to the EaP states. Drawing on the framing analysis of strategic documents and statements, which identifies eight distinct themes, the contribution ascertains three different patterns of EaP states' interaction with the EU: Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine accepting the 'EU's potential we', Armenia holding to the potential we, and Azerbaijan, as well as Belarus, contesting the potential we. |
id |
RCAP_aa831d5819f5f132a0ecae93cd97705f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/67678 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
The European Union's 'potential We' between acceptance and contestation: assessing the positioning of six eastern partnership countries*altercastingEastern partnershipEuropean neighbourhood policyRussiasocial identity theorySocial SciencesThe present contribution analyses the European neighbourhood policy and the Eastern Partnership (EaP), which celebrated its tenth anniversary in 2019, from the perspective of social identity theory. It is argued that the evolution of both the European neighbourhood policy and the EaP corresponds to the emergence of a distinct EU identity: its 'potential we', which has been defying the Russian 'significant we' extended to the EaP states. Drawing on the framing analysis of strategic documents and statements, which identifies eight distinct themes, the contribution ascertains three different patterns of EaP states' interaction with the EU: Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine accepting the 'EU's potential we', Armenia holding to the potential we, and Azerbaijan, as well as Belarus, contesting the potential we.This study was conducted at the Research Center in Political Science (CICP) (UIDB/CPO/00758/2020), University of Minho/University of Evora and supported by the Fundacao para a Cencia e Tecnologia (Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology, FCT) and the Portuguese Ministry of Education and Science through national funds. The author would like to thank the anonymous reviewers and the JCMS editors for their very constructive feedback.WileyUniversidade do MinhoVieira, Alena20212021-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1822/67678eng0021-98861468-596510.1111/jcms.13069https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jcms.13069info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-21T12:19:52Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/67678Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T19:12:54.574834Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The European Union's 'potential We' between acceptance and contestation: assessing the positioning of six eastern partnership countries* |
title |
The European Union's 'potential We' between acceptance and contestation: assessing the positioning of six eastern partnership countries* |
spellingShingle |
The European Union's 'potential We' between acceptance and contestation: assessing the positioning of six eastern partnership countries* Vieira, Alena altercasting Eastern partnership European neighbourhood policy Russia social identity theory Social Sciences |
title_short |
The European Union's 'potential We' between acceptance and contestation: assessing the positioning of six eastern partnership countries* |
title_full |
The European Union's 'potential We' between acceptance and contestation: assessing the positioning of six eastern partnership countries* |
title_fullStr |
The European Union's 'potential We' between acceptance and contestation: assessing the positioning of six eastern partnership countries* |
title_full_unstemmed |
The European Union's 'potential We' between acceptance and contestation: assessing the positioning of six eastern partnership countries* |
title_sort |
The European Union's 'potential We' between acceptance and contestation: assessing the positioning of six eastern partnership countries* |
author |
Vieira, Alena |
author_facet |
Vieira, Alena |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Minho |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Vieira, Alena |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
altercasting Eastern partnership European neighbourhood policy Russia social identity theory Social Sciences |
topic |
altercasting Eastern partnership European neighbourhood policy Russia social identity theory Social Sciences |
description |
The present contribution analyses the European neighbourhood policy and the Eastern Partnership (EaP), which celebrated its tenth anniversary in 2019, from the perspective of social identity theory. It is argued that the evolution of both the European neighbourhood policy and the EaP corresponds to the emergence of a distinct EU identity: its 'potential we', which has been defying the Russian 'significant we' extended to the EaP states. Drawing on the framing analysis of strategic documents and statements, which identifies eight distinct themes, the contribution ascertains three different patterns of EaP states' interaction with the EU: Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine accepting the 'EU's potential we', Armenia holding to the potential we, and Azerbaijan, as well as Belarus, contesting the potential we. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/1822/67678 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/1822/67678 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
0021-9886 1468-5965 10.1111/jcms.13069 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jcms.13069 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799132565884370944 |