Surface roughness evaluation of resin composites after finishing and polishing using 3D-profilometry
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10773/40329 |
Resumo: | The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of two finishing and polishing methods on the surface roughness of different resin composites. Twenty-two disk-shaped specimens of five resin composites Zirconfill® (ZF), Filtek™ Supreme XTE (FS), Brilliant EverGlow™ (BG), Ceram.X® Duo (CD), and Harmonize™ (HA) were prepared for each one using a silicon mold. Both surfaces of each specimen were first grinded with 600-grit silicon carbide paper in a moistened environment. The polishing methods used included the two-step Enhance® and PoGo® polishing system (E/P) or the four-step SwissFlex® discs (SFD). Surface roughness was evaluated using a noncontact 3D-optical profilometer. Surface morphology was examined by scanning electron microscopy. Data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance and pairwise comparisons with Tukey’s test (α ¼ 0:050). Surface roughness was affected by both the type of resin composite (p<0:001) and the finishing and polishing system (p<0:001), with a significant interaction between these two factors (p ¼ 0:025). The E/P system produced smoother surfaces than the SFD system (p<0:001). For the E/P system, the highest mean roughness value was obtained with ZF and was statistically different from all other composites, whereas inhomogeneous results among resin composites could be found for the SFD system. Surface roughness was material-dependent, and the polishability of the resin composites was best accomplished using the E/P system. Within each F/P system studied, BG showed the lowest average surface roughness and ZF registered the highest. |
id |
RCAP_acb1b95b2a6a524231e3ebdcd19b9807 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ria.ua.pt:10773/40329 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Surface roughness evaluation of resin composites after finishing and polishing using 3D-profilometryThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of two finishing and polishing methods on the surface roughness of different resin composites. Twenty-two disk-shaped specimens of five resin composites Zirconfill® (ZF), Filtek™ Supreme XTE (FS), Brilliant EverGlow™ (BG), Ceram.X® Duo (CD), and Harmonize™ (HA) were prepared for each one using a silicon mold. Both surfaces of each specimen were first grinded with 600-grit silicon carbide paper in a moistened environment. The polishing methods used included the two-step Enhance® and PoGo® polishing system (E/P) or the four-step SwissFlex® discs (SFD). Surface roughness was evaluated using a noncontact 3D-optical profilometer. Surface morphology was examined by scanning electron microscopy. Data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance and pairwise comparisons with Tukey’s test (α ¼ 0:050). Surface roughness was affected by both the type of resin composite (p<0:001) and the finishing and polishing system (p<0:001), with a significant interaction between these two factors (p ¼ 0:025). The E/P system produced smoother surfaces than the SFD system (p<0:001). For the E/P system, the highest mean roughness value was obtained with ZF and was statistically different from all other composites, whereas inhomogeneous results among resin composites could be found for the SFD system. Surface roughness was material-dependent, and the polishability of the resin composites was best accomplished using the E/P system. Within each F/P system studied, BG showed the lowest average surface roughness and ZF registered the highest.Hindawi2024-01-29T13:08:37Z2023-01-01T00:00:00Z2023info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/40329eng1687-872810.1155/2023/4078788Vinagre, AlexandraBarros, CatarinaGonçalves, JoanaMessias, AnaOliveira, FilipeRamos, Joãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-02-22T12:19:00Zoai:ria.ua.pt:10773/40329Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:10:22.806157Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Surface roughness evaluation of resin composites after finishing and polishing using 3D-profilometry |
title |
Surface roughness evaluation of resin composites after finishing and polishing using 3D-profilometry |
spellingShingle |
Surface roughness evaluation of resin composites after finishing and polishing using 3D-profilometry Vinagre, Alexandra |
title_short |
Surface roughness evaluation of resin composites after finishing and polishing using 3D-profilometry |
title_full |
Surface roughness evaluation of resin composites after finishing and polishing using 3D-profilometry |
title_fullStr |
Surface roughness evaluation of resin composites after finishing and polishing using 3D-profilometry |
title_full_unstemmed |
Surface roughness evaluation of resin composites after finishing and polishing using 3D-profilometry |
title_sort |
Surface roughness evaluation of resin composites after finishing and polishing using 3D-profilometry |
author |
Vinagre, Alexandra |
author_facet |
Vinagre, Alexandra Barros, Catarina Gonçalves, Joana Messias, Ana Oliveira, Filipe Ramos, João |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Barros, Catarina Gonçalves, Joana Messias, Ana Oliveira, Filipe Ramos, João |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Vinagre, Alexandra Barros, Catarina Gonçalves, Joana Messias, Ana Oliveira, Filipe Ramos, João |
description |
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of two finishing and polishing methods on the surface roughness of different resin composites. Twenty-two disk-shaped specimens of five resin composites Zirconfill® (ZF), Filtek™ Supreme XTE (FS), Brilliant EverGlow™ (BG), Ceram.X® Duo (CD), and Harmonize™ (HA) were prepared for each one using a silicon mold. Both surfaces of each specimen were first grinded with 600-grit silicon carbide paper in a moistened environment. The polishing methods used included the two-step Enhance® and PoGo® polishing system (E/P) or the four-step SwissFlex® discs (SFD). Surface roughness was evaluated using a noncontact 3D-optical profilometer. Surface morphology was examined by scanning electron microscopy. Data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance and pairwise comparisons with Tukey’s test (α ¼ 0:050). Surface roughness was affected by both the type of resin composite (p<0:001) and the finishing and polishing system (p<0:001), with a significant interaction between these two factors (p ¼ 0:025). The E/P system produced smoother surfaces than the SFD system (p<0:001). For the E/P system, the highest mean roughness value was obtained with ZF and was statistically different from all other composites, whereas inhomogeneous results among resin composites could be found for the SFD system. Surface roughness was material-dependent, and the polishability of the resin composites was best accomplished using the E/P system. Within each F/P system studied, BG showed the lowest average surface roughness and ZF registered the highest. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-01-01T00:00:00Z 2023 2024-01-29T13:08:37Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10773/40329 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10773/40329 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
1687-8728 10.1155/2023/4078788 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hindawi |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hindawi |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799137753785434112 |