Composite surfaces after finishing and polishing techniques

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Turssi, Cecilia P.
Data de Publicação: 2000
Outros Autores: Saad, Jose R. C., Duarte Jr, Sillas L. L., Rodrigues Jr., Antonio L. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/11449/219238
Resumo: Purpose: To evaluate the effect of finishing and polishing techniques on surface roughness of resin-based composites (RBCs). Materials and Methods: Forty specimens of each material were cured under Mylar strips and immersed in artificial saliva for 1 wk. Samples were tested with a profilometer to obtain baseline average surface roughness (Ra). Specimens of both RBCs were then finished and polished according to four techniques: (1) Sof-Lex disks; (2) Sof-Lex disks followed by Prisma Gloss; (3) Enhance points; (4) Enhance points followed by Prisma Gloss application. New readings of the roughness pattern were carried out and the difference of post-polishing and baseline values were analyzed. Results: ANOVA test (α= 0.05) did not show differences between materials (P= 0.9393) nor interaction effects (P= 0.3094), but significant difference among the finishing/polishing techniques were detected (P= 0.0157). Tukey's test showed that the smoothest surface was obtained when the specimens were treated by Sof-Lex followed by Prosma Gloss polishing paste; and the worst results were obtained after using Enhance points alone.
id UNSP_e021c78b3ff98e81c1b80e02b0300eee
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/219238
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Composite surfaces after finishing and polishing techniquesPurpose: To evaluate the effect of finishing and polishing techniques on surface roughness of resin-based composites (RBCs). Materials and Methods: Forty specimens of each material were cured under Mylar strips and immersed in artificial saliva for 1 wk. Samples were tested with a profilometer to obtain baseline average surface roughness (Ra). Specimens of both RBCs were then finished and polished according to four techniques: (1) Sof-Lex disks; (2) Sof-Lex disks followed by Prisma Gloss; (3) Enhance points; (4) Enhance points followed by Prisma Gloss application. New readings of the roughness pattern were carried out and the difference of post-polishing and baseline values were analyzed. Results: ANOVA test (α= 0.05) did not show differences between materials (P= 0.9393) nor interaction effects (P= 0.3094), but significant difference among the finishing/polishing techniques were detected (P= 0.0157). Tukey's test showed that the smoothest surface was obtained when the specimens were treated by Sof-Lex followed by Prosma Gloss polishing paste; and the worst results were obtained after using Enhance points alone.Discipline Biostatist. Sci. M. Araraquara School of Dentistry UNESP, Araraquara, Säo PauloDiscipline Biostatist. Sci. M. Araraquara School of Dentistry UNESP, Araraquara, Säo PauloUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Turssi, Cecilia P.Saad, Jose R. C.Duarte Jr, Sillas L. L.Rodrigues Jr., Antonio L. [UNESP]2022-04-28T18:54:31Z2022-04-28T18:54:31Z2000-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article136-138American Journal of Dentistry, v. 13, n. 3, p. 136-138, 2000.0894-8275http://hdl.handle.net/11449/2192382-s2.0-0034209290Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengAmerican Journal of Dentistryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T18:54:31Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/219238Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T21:06:44.456004Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Composite surfaces after finishing and polishing techniques
title Composite surfaces after finishing and polishing techniques
spellingShingle Composite surfaces after finishing and polishing techniques
Turssi, Cecilia P.
title_short Composite surfaces after finishing and polishing techniques
title_full Composite surfaces after finishing and polishing techniques
title_fullStr Composite surfaces after finishing and polishing techniques
title_full_unstemmed Composite surfaces after finishing and polishing techniques
title_sort Composite surfaces after finishing and polishing techniques
author Turssi, Cecilia P.
author_facet Turssi, Cecilia P.
Saad, Jose R. C.
Duarte Jr, Sillas L. L.
Rodrigues Jr., Antonio L. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Saad, Jose R. C.
Duarte Jr, Sillas L. L.
Rodrigues Jr., Antonio L. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Turssi, Cecilia P.
Saad, Jose R. C.
Duarte Jr, Sillas L. L.
Rodrigues Jr., Antonio L. [UNESP]
description Purpose: To evaluate the effect of finishing and polishing techniques on surface roughness of resin-based composites (RBCs). Materials and Methods: Forty specimens of each material were cured under Mylar strips and immersed in artificial saliva for 1 wk. Samples were tested with a profilometer to obtain baseline average surface roughness (Ra). Specimens of both RBCs were then finished and polished according to four techniques: (1) Sof-Lex disks; (2) Sof-Lex disks followed by Prisma Gloss; (3) Enhance points; (4) Enhance points followed by Prisma Gloss application. New readings of the roughness pattern were carried out and the difference of post-polishing and baseline values were analyzed. Results: ANOVA test (α= 0.05) did not show differences between materials (P= 0.9393) nor interaction effects (P= 0.3094), but significant difference among the finishing/polishing techniques were detected (P= 0.0157). Tukey's test showed that the smoothest surface was obtained when the specimens were treated by Sof-Lex followed by Prosma Gloss polishing paste; and the worst results were obtained after using Enhance points alone.
publishDate 2000
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2000-06-01
2022-04-28T18:54:31Z
2022-04-28T18:54:31Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv American Journal of Dentistry, v. 13, n. 3, p. 136-138, 2000.
0894-8275
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/219238
2-s2.0-0034209290
identifier_str_mv American Journal of Dentistry, v. 13, n. 3, p. 136-138, 2000.
0894-8275
2-s2.0-0034209290
url http://hdl.handle.net/11449/219238
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv American Journal of Dentistry
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 136-138
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129285998772224