Perception of be Cared in Childbirth at the Light of the WHO Model
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10174/21698 https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20170606.15 |
Resumo: | Background: The World Health Organization recommends preserving the physiology of childbirth. For a normal birth, the guidelines define obstetric practices in four categories, ranging from useful and to be encouraged to harmful and to be eliminated. Objective: to describe new mothers’ perception of care during childbirth in the light of the World Health Organization model. Methods: Cross-sectional study. A self-administered structured questionnaire was used for data collection. Convenience sample of 180 mothers. The average age was 30.8 years-old (SD=5.31). Results: On their own initiative, before leaving for the maternity, women carried out at home, some care not recommended by World Health Organization, like pubic shaving (83.7%). Category A represents above all the lack of a birth plan (80.6%), mobility (71.3%), massage /54.2%) and light feeding (72.6%). Positively represented are skin-to-skin contact (77%) and breast-feeding (75.6%). Category B highlights intravenous fluids access (81.6%), lithotomy position for delivery (82.9%) and directed pushing (86.9%). Pubic shaving is recognized by about 22% of participants. The Kristeller maneuver or fundal pressure, is widely applied in Category D (59.9%), highlighting continuous cardiotocography (89.2%), repeated vaginal examination carried out by various professionals (78.5%) and episiotomy (69.2%). Conclusion: The World Health Organization model is weakly implemented. The medicalized culture of childbirth seems to predominate in phenomena of human nature. |
id |
RCAP_aeaba66aa7006770450d25900a218215 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/21698 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Perception of be Cared in Childbirth at the Light of the WHO ModelLaborNormal birthNursingMidwiferyObstetricsBackground: The World Health Organization recommends preserving the physiology of childbirth. For a normal birth, the guidelines define obstetric practices in four categories, ranging from useful and to be encouraged to harmful and to be eliminated. Objective: to describe new mothers’ perception of care during childbirth in the light of the World Health Organization model. Methods: Cross-sectional study. A self-administered structured questionnaire was used for data collection. Convenience sample of 180 mothers. The average age was 30.8 years-old (SD=5.31). Results: On their own initiative, before leaving for the maternity, women carried out at home, some care not recommended by World Health Organization, like pubic shaving (83.7%). Category A represents above all the lack of a birth plan (80.6%), mobility (71.3%), massage /54.2%) and light feeding (72.6%). Positively represented are skin-to-skin contact (77%) and breast-feeding (75.6%). Category B highlights intravenous fluids access (81.6%), lithotomy position for delivery (82.9%) and directed pushing (86.9%). Pubic shaving is recognized by about 22% of participants. The Kristeller maneuver or fundal pressure, is widely applied in Category D (59.9%), highlighting continuous cardiotocography (89.2%), repeated vaginal examination carried out by various professionals (78.5%) and episiotomy (69.2%). Conclusion: The World Health Organization model is weakly implemented. The medicalized culture of childbirth seems to predominate in phenomena of human nature.Science Publishing Group2018-01-04T13:09:34Z2018-01-042017-12-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10174/21698http://hdl.handle.net/10174/21698https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20170606.15porMarques, M. & Sim-Sim, M. (2017). Perception of be Cared in Childbirth at the Light of the WHO Model, American Journal of Nursing Science 6(6) 478-485. doi: 10.11648/j.ajns.20170606.15http://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajns.20170606.15.pdfmjp3@uevora.ptmsimsim@uevora.pt744Marques, MariaSim-Sim, Margaridainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-03T19:12:36Zoai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/21698Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:12:57.108447Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Perception of be Cared in Childbirth at the Light of the WHO Model |
title |
Perception of be Cared in Childbirth at the Light of the WHO Model |
spellingShingle |
Perception of be Cared in Childbirth at the Light of the WHO Model Marques, Maria Labor Normal birth Nursing Midwifery Obstetrics |
title_short |
Perception of be Cared in Childbirth at the Light of the WHO Model |
title_full |
Perception of be Cared in Childbirth at the Light of the WHO Model |
title_fullStr |
Perception of be Cared in Childbirth at the Light of the WHO Model |
title_full_unstemmed |
Perception of be Cared in Childbirth at the Light of the WHO Model |
title_sort |
Perception of be Cared in Childbirth at the Light of the WHO Model |
author |
Marques, Maria |
author_facet |
Marques, Maria Sim-Sim, Margarida |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Sim-Sim, Margarida |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Marques, Maria Sim-Sim, Margarida |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Labor Normal birth Nursing Midwifery Obstetrics |
topic |
Labor Normal birth Nursing Midwifery Obstetrics |
description |
Background: The World Health Organization recommends preserving the physiology of childbirth. For a normal birth, the guidelines define obstetric practices in four categories, ranging from useful and to be encouraged to harmful and to be eliminated. Objective: to describe new mothers’ perception of care during childbirth in the light of the World Health Organization model. Methods: Cross-sectional study. A self-administered structured questionnaire was used for data collection. Convenience sample of 180 mothers. The average age was 30.8 years-old (SD=5.31). Results: On their own initiative, before leaving for the maternity, women carried out at home, some care not recommended by World Health Organization, like pubic shaving (83.7%). Category A represents above all the lack of a birth plan (80.6%), mobility (71.3%), massage /54.2%) and light feeding (72.6%). Positively represented are skin-to-skin contact (77%) and breast-feeding (75.6%). Category B highlights intravenous fluids access (81.6%), lithotomy position for delivery (82.9%) and directed pushing (86.9%). Pubic shaving is recognized by about 22% of participants. The Kristeller maneuver or fundal pressure, is widely applied in Category D (59.9%), highlighting continuous cardiotocography (89.2%), repeated vaginal examination carried out by various professionals (78.5%) and episiotomy (69.2%). Conclusion: The World Health Organization model is weakly implemented. The medicalized culture of childbirth seems to predominate in phenomena of human nature. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-12-01T00:00:00Z 2018-01-04T13:09:34Z 2018-01-04 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/21698 http://hdl.handle.net/10174/21698 https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20170606.15 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/21698 https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20170606.15 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Marques, M. & Sim-Sim, M. (2017). Perception of be Cared in Childbirth at the Light of the WHO Model, American Journal of Nursing Science 6(6) 478-485. doi: 10.11648/j.ajns.20170606.15 http://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajns.20170606.15.pdf mjp3@uevora.pt msimsim@uevora.pt 744 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Science Publishing Group |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Science Publishing Group |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799136611154264064 |