Developing a management-based ranking of beaches from a worldwide perspective
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/19836 |
Resumo: | The research aimed to develop a robust and objective framework, based on management effectiveness, to rank beaches worldwide by the integration of indicators and the assessment of the socio-ecological system quality. The methodology involved a critical analysis of web-based rankings to collect the information on how they are made and the indicators used. In addition, a survey was conducted in the Science Direct database to identify the indicators used in beach quality assessments by the scientific literature. The indicators identified were evaluated according to their usefulness for beach management following the SMART criteria. The indicators that passed the evaluation were grouped into domains and categories following the official classification by the literature. Moreover, a measurement technique and a 5-point rating score for each indicator was suggested based on these same articles. Weights were calculated for different beach types using analytical hierarchical process and focus group. The quality value of each beach was calculated through equations after normalization, and the results were output in graphs inspired by CS and OHI. The results show that web-based rankings are mostly subjective and that beaches on these lists are not directly compared to one another. Moreover, they are exploring the visual appealing aspect, which is clear by the importance of indicators (color of water/sand are the most recurrent). The scientific literature, on the other hand, despite incorporating a wider set of indicators, are also focusing on recreation and user satisfaction. The indicators chosen to compose the framework are distributed into four domains (recreation, protection, conservation and sanitary) that cover main functions of a beach and aim to see it from a holistic view. The allocation of weights allowed respecting the differences provoked by distinct urbanization levels, granting the safeguard of the characteristics of every beach type, while the rating score helped to reduce the subjectivity by ensuring that the scale of comparison is always the same. The application of the framework on Portuguese beaches validated the methodology and showed the framework fulfills its purpose of ranking and pointing out the strengths and weakness of every beach. |
id |
RCAP_b21a2ce9e1cecc8db655f090e9565fae |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:sapientia.ualg.pt:10400.1/19836 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Developing a management-based ranking of beaches from a worldwide perspectiveBeach rankingBeach qualityIndicatorsBeach managementDomínio/Área Científica::Ciências Naturais::Outras Ciências NaturaisThe research aimed to develop a robust and objective framework, based on management effectiveness, to rank beaches worldwide by the integration of indicators and the assessment of the socio-ecological system quality. The methodology involved a critical analysis of web-based rankings to collect the information on how they are made and the indicators used. In addition, a survey was conducted in the Science Direct database to identify the indicators used in beach quality assessments by the scientific literature. The indicators identified were evaluated according to their usefulness for beach management following the SMART criteria. The indicators that passed the evaluation were grouped into domains and categories following the official classification by the literature. Moreover, a measurement technique and a 5-point rating score for each indicator was suggested based on these same articles. Weights were calculated for different beach types using analytical hierarchical process and focus group. The quality value of each beach was calculated through equations after normalization, and the results were output in graphs inspired by CS and OHI. The results show that web-based rankings are mostly subjective and that beaches on these lists are not directly compared to one another. Moreover, they are exploring the visual appealing aspect, which is clear by the importance of indicators (color of water/sand are the most recurrent). The scientific literature, on the other hand, despite incorporating a wider set of indicators, are also focusing on recreation and user satisfaction. The indicators chosen to compose the framework are distributed into four domains (recreation, protection, conservation and sanitary) that cover main functions of a beach and aim to see it from a holistic view. The allocation of weights allowed respecting the differences provoked by distinct urbanization levels, granting the safeguard of the characteristics of every beach type, while the rating score helped to reduce the subjectivity by ensuring that the scale of comparison is always the same. The application of the framework on Portuguese beaches validated the methodology and showed the framework fulfills its purpose of ranking and pointing out the strengths and weakness of every beach.First, I would like to thank the Erasmus Mundus Program for the funding, the Water & Coastal Management Program for the opportunity to come abroad and study with such an amazing academic group, and all the WACOMA coordinators and collaborators who provided the support during this time. INewton, AliceBotero, CamiloSapientiaOliveira, Elaine2023-07-18T12:04:24Z2022-07-122022-07-12T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/19836TID:203228839enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-26T02:00:50Zoai:sapientia.ualg.pt:10400.1/19836Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:09:23.429127Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Developing a management-based ranking of beaches from a worldwide perspective |
title |
Developing a management-based ranking of beaches from a worldwide perspective |
spellingShingle |
Developing a management-based ranking of beaches from a worldwide perspective Oliveira, Elaine Beach ranking Beach quality Indicators Beach management Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Naturais::Outras Ciências Naturais |
title_short |
Developing a management-based ranking of beaches from a worldwide perspective |
title_full |
Developing a management-based ranking of beaches from a worldwide perspective |
title_fullStr |
Developing a management-based ranking of beaches from a worldwide perspective |
title_full_unstemmed |
Developing a management-based ranking of beaches from a worldwide perspective |
title_sort |
Developing a management-based ranking of beaches from a worldwide perspective |
author |
Oliveira, Elaine |
author_facet |
Oliveira, Elaine |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Newton, Alice Botero, Camilo Sapientia |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Elaine |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Beach ranking Beach quality Indicators Beach management Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Naturais::Outras Ciências Naturais |
topic |
Beach ranking Beach quality Indicators Beach management Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Naturais::Outras Ciências Naturais |
description |
The research aimed to develop a robust and objective framework, based on management effectiveness, to rank beaches worldwide by the integration of indicators and the assessment of the socio-ecological system quality. The methodology involved a critical analysis of web-based rankings to collect the information on how they are made and the indicators used. In addition, a survey was conducted in the Science Direct database to identify the indicators used in beach quality assessments by the scientific literature. The indicators identified were evaluated according to their usefulness for beach management following the SMART criteria. The indicators that passed the evaluation were grouped into domains and categories following the official classification by the literature. Moreover, a measurement technique and a 5-point rating score for each indicator was suggested based on these same articles. Weights were calculated for different beach types using analytical hierarchical process and focus group. The quality value of each beach was calculated through equations after normalization, and the results were output in graphs inspired by CS and OHI. The results show that web-based rankings are mostly subjective and that beaches on these lists are not directly compared to one another. Moreover, they are exploring the visual appealing aspect, which is clear by the importance of indicators (color of water/sand are the most recurrent). The scientific literature, on the other hand, despite incorporating a wider set of indicators, are also focusing on recreation and user satisfaction. The indicators chosen to compose the framework are distributed into four domains (recreation, protection, conservation and sanitary) that cover main functions of a beach and aim to see it from a holistic view. The allocation of weights allowed respecting the differences provoked by distinct urbanization levels, granting the safeguard of the characteristics of every beach type, while the rating score helped to reduce the subjectivity by ensuring that the scale of comparison is always the same. The application of the framework on Portuguese beaches validated the methodology and showed the framework fulfills its purpose of ranking and pointing out the strengths and weakness of every beach. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-07-12 2022-07-12T00:00:00Z 2023-07-18T12:04:24Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/19836 TID:203228839 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/19836 |
identifier_str_mv |
TID:203228839 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799133341449977856 |