Developing a management-based ranking of beaches from a worldwide perspective

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Elaine
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/19836
Resumo: The research aimed to develop a robust and objective framework, based on management effectiveness, to rank beaches worldwide by the integration of indicators and the assessment of the socio-ecological system quality. The methodology involved a critical analysis of web-based rankings to collect the information on how they are made and the indicators used. In addition, a survey was conducted in the Science Direct database to identify the indicators used in beach quality assessments by the scientific literature. The indicators identified were evaluated according to their usefulness for beach management following the SMART criteria. The indicators that passed the evaluation were grouped into domains and categories following the official classification by the literature. Moreover, a measurement technique and a 5-point rating score for each indicator was suggested based on these same articles. Weights were calculated for different beach types using analytical hierarchical process and focus group. The quality value of each beach was calculated through equations after normalization, and the results were output in graphs inspired by CS and OHI. The results show that web-based rankings are mostly subjective and that beaches on these lists are not directly compared to one another. Moreover, they are exploring the visual appealing aspect, which is clear by the importance of indicators (color of water/sand are the most recurrent). The scientific literature, on the other hand, despite incorporating a wider set of indicators, are also focusing on recreation and user satisfaction. The indicators chosen to compose the framework are distributed into four domains (recreation, protection, conservation and sanitary) that cover main functions of a beach and aim to see it from a holistic view. The allocation of weights allowed respecting the differences provoked by distinct urbanization levels, granting the safeguard of the characteristics of every beach type, while the rating score helped to reduce the subjectivity by ensuring that the scale of comparison is always the same. The application of the framework on Portuguese beaches validated the methodology and showed the framework fulfills its purpose of ranking and pointing out the strengths and weakness of every beach.
id RCAP_b21a2ce9e1cecc8db655f090e9565fae
oai_identifier_str oai:sapientia.ualg.pt:10400.1/19836
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Developing a management-based ranking of beaches from a worldwide perspectiveBeach rankingBeach qualityIndicatorsBeach managementDomínio/Área Científica::Ciências Naturais::Outras Ciências NaturaisThe research aimed to develop a robust and objective framework, based on management effectiveness, to rank beaches worldwide by the integration of indicators and the assessment of the socio-ecological system quality. The methodology involved a critical analysis of web-based rankings to collect the information on how they are made and the indicators used. In addition, a survey was conducted in the Science Direct database to identify the indicators used in beach quality assessments by the scientific literature. The indicators identified were evaluated according to their usefulness for beach management following the SMART criteria. The indicators that passed the evaluation were grouped into domains and categories following the official classification by the literature. Moreover, a measurement technique and a 5-point rating score for each indicator was suggested based on these same articles. Weights were calculated for different beach types using analytical hierarchical process and focus group. The quality value of each beach was calculated through equations after normalization, and the results were output in graphs inspired by CS and OHI. The results show that web-based rankings are mostly subjective and that beaches on these lists are not directly compared to one another. Moreover, they are exploring the visual appealing aspect, which is clear by the importance of indicators (color of water/sand are the most recurrent). The scientific literature, on the other hand, despite incorporating a wider set of indicators, are also focusing on recreation and user satisfaction. The indicators chosen to compose the framework are distributed into four domains (recreation, protection, conservation and sanitary) that cover main functions of a beach and aim to see it from a holistic view. The allocation of weights allowed respecting the differences provoked by distinct urbanization levels, granting the safeguard of the characteristics of every beach type, while the rating score helped to reduce the subjectivity by ensuring that the scale of comparison is always the same. The application of the framework on Portuguese beaches validated the methodology and showed the framework fulfills its purpose of ranking and pointing out the strengths and weakness of every beach.First, I would like to thank the Erasmus Mundus Program for the funding, the Water & Coastal Management Program for the opportunity to come abroad and study with such an amazing academic group, and all the WACOMA coordinators and collaborators who provided the support during this time. INewton, AliceBotero, CamiloSapientiaOliveira, Elaine2023-07-18T12:04:24Z2022-07-122022-07-12T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/19836TID:203228839enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-26T02:00:50Zoai:sapientia.ualg.pt:10400.1/19836Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:09:23.429127Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Developing a management-based ranking of beaches from a worldwide perspective
title Developing a management-based ranking of beaches from a worldwide perspective
spellingShingle Developing a management-based ranking of beaches from a worldwide perspective
Oliveira, Elaine
Beach ranking
Beach quality
Indicators
Beach management
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Naturais::Outras Ciências Naturais
title_short Developing a management-based ranking of beaches from a worldwide perspective
title_full Developing a management-based ranking of beaches from a worldwide perspective
title_fullStr Developing a management-based ranking of beaches from a worldwide perspective
title_full_unstemmed Developing a management-based ranking of beaches from a worldwide perspective
title_sort Developing a management-based ranking of beaches from a worldwide perspective
author Oliveira, Elaine
author_facet Oliveira, Elaine
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Newton, Alice
Botero, Camilo
Sapientia
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Elaine
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Beach ranking
Beach quality
Indicators
Beach management
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Naturais::Outras Ciências Naturais
topic Beach ranking
Beach quality
Indicators
Beach management
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Naturais::Outras Ciências Naturais
description The research aimed to develop a robust and objective framework, based on management effectiveness, to rank beaches worldwide by the integration of indicators and the assessment of the socio-ecological system quality. The methodology involved a critical analysis of web-based rankings to collect the information on how they are made and the indicators used. In addition, a survey was conducted in the Science Direct database to identify the indicators used in beach quality assessments by the scientific literature. The indicators identified were evaluated according to their usefulness for beach management following the SMART criteria. The indicators that passed the evaluation were grouped into domains and categories following the official classification by the literature. Moreover, a measurement technique and a 5-point rating score for each indicator was suggested based on these same articles. Weights were calculated for different beach types using analytical hierarchical process and focus group. The quality value of each beach was calculated through equations after normalization, and the results were output in graphs inspired by CS and OHI. The results show that web-based rankings are mostly subjective and that beaches on these lists are not directly compared to one another. Moreover, they are exploring the visual appealing aspect, which is clear by the importance of indicators (color of water/sand are the most recurrent). The scientific literature, on the other hand, despite incorporating a wider set of indicators, are also focusing on recreation and user satisfaction. The indicators chosen to compose the framework are distributed into four domains (recreation, protection, conservation and sanitary) that cover main functions of a beach and aim to see it from a holistic view. The allocation of weights allowed respecting the differences provoked by distinct urbanization levels, granting the safeguard of the characteristics of every beach type, while the rating score helped to reduce the subjectivity by ensuring that the scale of comparison is always the same. The application of the framework on Portuguese beaches validated the methodology and showed the framework fulfills its purpose of ranking and pointing out the strengths and weakness of every beach.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-07-12
2022-07-12T00:00:00Z
2023-07-18T12:04:24Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/19836
TID:203228839
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/19836
identifier_str_mv TID:203228839
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133341449977856