Bacterial growth and recovery on hospital biometric devices: effect of two types of disinfectants

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Norton, P
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Guimarães, JT, Pinho, P, Ribeiro, M, Martins, N, Mendes, CP
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/149743
Resumo: Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate the presence of bacterial contamination on biometric identification devices in a public hospital; identify the species of bacteria implicated in the contamination and assess bacterial recovery after the use of 2 types of disinfectants: alcohol 70% and isopropyl alcohol chlorhexidine. Design: Before and after trial. Setting: Public hospital, tertiary referral center. Participants: All existing biometric identification devices in the hospital (n = 20). Methods: Collection of 2 microbiological samples from the fingerprint reading surface of biometric devices immediately before and after applying the solution with alcohol 70% and in separate time periods with isopropyl alcohol chlorhexidine. Results: It have been identified 21 different bacterial species in a total of 78 samples, mostly Staphylococcus epidermidis (32 samples) and S aureus (7 samples). S epidermidis was eliminated in 61.5% of the samples after disinfecting with alcohol 70% and in 92.3% of the samples disinfected with isopropyl alcohol chlorhexidine. S aureus was eliminated in 33.3% and 100% of the samples, respectively. We found no bacterial growth in 10% of the devices after disinfection with 70% alcohol and in 78.9% of devices after disinfection with isopropyl alcohol chlorhexidine. We also found that there was a decrease in the frequency of species isolated after using both disinfection solutions, although isopropyl alcohol chlorhexidine appeared to be more effective. Conclusions: The biometric identification devices used in this hospital seem to be safe regardless of the products used for its cleaning. The majority of the bacteria found are commensal skin microorganisms. We did not find pathogenic bacteria for immunocompetent individuals, in particular methicillin-resistant S aureus.
id RCAP_b29eec30da5a4925ca32cb6ccccfefe1
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/149743
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Bacterial growth and recovery on hospital biometric devices: effect of two types of disinfectantsbacteriabiometric authenticationbiometric identificationhospitalObjectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate the presence of bacterial contamination on biometric identification devices in a public hospital; identify the species of bacteria implicated in the contamination and assess bacterial recovery after the use of 2 types of disinfectants: alcohol 70% and isopropyl alcohol chlorhexidine. Design: Before and after trial. Setting: Public hospital, tertiary referral center. Participants: All existing biometric identification devices in the hospital (n = 20). Methods: Collection of 2 microbiological samples from the fingerprint reading surface of biometric devices immediately before and after applying the solution with alcohol 70% and in separate time periods with isopropyl alcohol chlorhexidine. Results: It have been identified 21 different bacterial species in a total of 78 samples, mostly Staphylococcus epidermidis (32 samples) and S aureus (7 samples). S epidermidis was eliminated in 61.5% of the samples after disinfecting with alcohol 70% and in 92.3% of the samples disinfected with isopropyl alcohol chlorhexidine. S aureus was eliminated in 33.3% and 100% of the samples, respectively. We found no bacterial growth in 10% of the devices after disinfection with 70% alcohol and in 78.9% of devices after disinfection with isopropyl alcohol chlorhexidine. We also found that there was a decrease in the frequency of species isolated after using both disinfection solutions, although isopropyl alcohol chlorhexidine appeared to be more effective. Conclusions: The biometric identification devices used in this hospital seem to be safe regardless of the products used for its cleaning. The majority of the bacteria found are commensal skin microorganisms. We did not find pathogenic bacteria for immunocompetent individuals, in particular methicillin-resistant S aureus.Wolters Kluwer Health20212021-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/10216/149743eng2444-866410.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000088Norton, PGuimarães, JTPinho, PRibeiro, MMartins, NMendes, CPinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-29T13:41:33Zoai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/149743Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T23:45:49.042048Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Bacterial growth and recovery on hospital biometric devices: effect of two types of disinfectants
title Bacterial growth and recovery on hospital biometric devices: effect of two types of disinfectants
spellingShingle Bacterial growth and recovery on hospital biometric devices: effect of two types of disinfectants
Norton, P
bacteria
biometric authentication
biometric identification
hospital
title_short Bacterial growth and recovery on hospital biometric devices: effect of two types of disinfectants
title_full Bacterial growth and recovery on hospital biometric devices: effect of two types of disinfectants
title_fullStr Bacterial growth and recovery on hospital biometric devices: effect of two types of disinfectants
title_full_unstemmed Bacterial growth and recovery on hospital biometric devices: effect of two types of disinfectants
title_sort Bacterial growth and recovery on hospital biometric devices: effect of two types of disinfectants
author Norton, P
author_facet Norton, P
Guimarães, JT
Pinho, P
Ribeiro, M
Martins, N
Mendes, CP
author_role author
author2 Guimarães, JT
Pinho, P
Ribeiro, M
Martins, N
Mendes, CP
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Norton, P
Guimarães, JT
Pinho, P
Ribeiro, M
Martins, N
Mendes, CP
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv bacteria
biometric authentication
biometric identification
hospital
topic bacteria
biometric authentication
biometric identification
hospital
description Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate the presence of bacterial contamination on biometric identification devices in a public hospital; identify the species of bacteria implicated in the contamination and assess bacterial recovery after the use of 2 types of disinfectants: alcohol 70% and isopropyl alcohol chlorhexidine. Design: Before and after trial. Setting: Public hospital, tertiary referral center. Participants: All existing biometric identification devices in the hospital (n = 20). Methods: Collection of 2 microbiological samples from the fingerprint reading surface of biometric devices immediately before and after applying the solution with alcohol 70% and in separate time periods with isopropyl alcohol chlorhexidine. Results: It have been identified 21 different bacterial species in a total of 78 samples, mostly Staphylococcus epidermidis (32 samples) and S aureus (7 samples). S epidermidis was eliminated in 61.5% of the samples after disinfecting with alcohol 70% and in 92.3% of the samples disinfected with isopropyl alcohol chlorhexidine. S aureus was eliminated in 33.3% and 100% of the samples, respectively. We found no bacterial growth in 10% of the devices after disinfection with 70% alcohol and in 78.9% of devices after disinfection with isopropyl alcohol chlorhexidine. We also found that there was a decrease in the frequency of species isolated after using both disinfection solutions, although isopropyl alcohol chlorhexidine appeared to be more effective. Conclusions: The biometric identification devices used in this hospital seem to be safe regardless of the products used for its cleaning. The majority of the bacteria found are commensal skin microorganisms. We did not find pathogenic bacteria for immunocompetent individuals, in particular methicillin-resistant S aureus.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021
2021-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10216/149743
url https://hdl.handle.net/10216/149743
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2444-8664
10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000088
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wolters Kluwer Health
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wolters Kluwer Health
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799135775272468480