Portfolio selection under uncertainty: a new methodology for computing relative‐robust solutions

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Caçador, Sandra
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Dias, Joana Matos, Godinho, Pedro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10316/87194
https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12674
Resumo: In this paper, a new methodology for computing relative-robust portfolios based on minimax regret is proposed. Regret is defined as the utility loss for the investor resulting from choosing a given portfolio instead of choosing the optimal portfolio of the realized scenario. The absolute robust strategy was also considered and, in this case, the minimum investor’s expected utility in the worst-case scenario is maximized. Several subsamples are gathered from the in-sample data and for each subsample a minimax regret and a maximin solution are computed, to avoid the risk of overfitting. Robust portfolios are computed using a genetic algorithm, allowing the transformation of a 3-level optimization problem in a 2-level problem. Results show that the proposed relative-robust portfolio generally outperforms (other) relative-robust and non-robust portfolios, except for the global minimum variance portfolio. Furthermore, the relative-robust portfolio generally outperforms the absolute-robust portfolio, even considering higher risk aversion levels.
id RCAP_b2ac64d5d8faf4309e0aa37a46344704
oai_identifier_str oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/87194
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Portfolio selection under uncertainty: a new methodology for computing relative‐robust solutionsRobust optimizationportfolio selectionrelative robustnessminimax regretIn this paper, a new methodology for computing relative-robust portfolios based on minimax regret is proposed. Regret is defined as the utility loss for the investor resulting from choosing a given portfolio instead of choosing the optimal portfolio of the realized scenario. The absolute robust strategy was also considered and, in this case, the minimum investor’s expected utility in the worst-case scenario is maximized. Several subsamples are gathered from the in-sample data and for each subsample a minimax regret and a maximin solution are computed, to avoid the risk of overfitting. Robust portfolios are computed using a genetic algorithm, allowing the transformation of a 3-level optimization problem in a 2-level problem. Results show that the proposed relative-robust portfolio generally outperforms (other) relative-robust and non-robust portfolios, except for the global minimum variance portfolio. Furthermore, the relative-robust portfolio generally outperforms the absolute-robust portfolio, even considering higher risk aversion levels.Wiley2019-04-29info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10316/87194http://hdl.handle.net/10316/87194https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12674eng1475-3995https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12674Caçador, SandraDias, Joana MatosGodinho, Pedroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2021-08-24T08:48:24Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/87194Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T21:08:10.189695Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Portfolio selection under uncertainty: a new methodology for computing relative‐robust solutions
title Portfolio selection under uncertainty: a new methodology for computing relative‐robust solutions
spellingShingle Portfolio selection under uncertainty: a new methodology for computing relative‐robust solutions
Caçador, Sandra
Robust optimization
portfolio selection
relative robustness
minimax regret
title_short Portfolio selection under uncertainty: a new methodology for computing relative‐robust solutions
title_full Portfolio selection under uncertainty: a new methodology for computing relative‐robust solutions
title_fullStr Portfolio selection under uncertainty: a new methodology for computing relative‐robust solutions
title_full_unstemmed Portfolio selection under uncertainty: a new methodology for computing relative‐robust solutions
title_sort Portfolio selection under uncertainty: a new methodology for computing relative‐robust solutions
author Caçador, Sandra
author_facet Caçador, Sandra
Dias, Joana Matos
Godinho, Pedro
author_role author
author2 Dias, Joana Matos
Godinho, Pedro
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Caçador, Sandra
Dias, Joana Matos
Godinho, Pedro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Robust optimization
portfolio selection
relative robustness
minimax regret
topic Robust optimization
portfolio selection
relative robustness
minimax regret
description In this paper, a new methodology for computing relative-robust portfolios based on minimax regret is proposed. Regret is defined as the utility loss for the investor resulting from choosing a given portfolio instead of choosing the optimal portfolio of the realized scenario. The absolute robust strategy was also considered and, in this case, the minimum investor’s expected utility in the worst-case scenario is maximized. Several subsamples are gathered from the in-sample data and for each subsample a minimax regret and a maximin solution are computed, to avoid the risk of overfitting. Robust portfolios are computed using a genetic algorithm, allowing the transformation of a 3-level optimization problem in a 2-level problem. Results show that the proposed relative-robust portfolio generally outperforms (other) relative-robust and non-robust portfolios, except for the global minimum variance portfolio. Furthermore, the relative-robust portfolio generally outperforms the absolute-robust portfolio, even considering higher risk aversion levels.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-04-29
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10316/87194
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/87194
https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12674
url http://hdl.handle.net/10316/87194
https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12674
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1475-3995
https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12674
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133973630156800