Systematic review of qualitative studies in solid waste
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.4.2020.55-66 |
Resumo: | This work intends to analyze studies related to solid waste management developed with qualitative methods. A systematic literature review of the articles published between 2014 and 2019 was made in the Scielo databases (Scientific Electronic Library Online), in the CAPES Journal Portal and Web of Science. In addition to searching for reference journals in the area of waste (Waste Management and Waste Management and Research) through the descriptors “Qualitative Research” and “Solid Waste”; “Interview”, “Solid Waste” and “Perception” (Interviews, Solid Waste and Perception) and 598 articles were found, and after applying the selection criteria the universe was reduced to a total of 42 publications. The selected articles were analyzed and categorized according to the most relevant aspects such as work objectives, study sample and main results. Qualitative research has been found to be a viable tool and can be employed on a large scale in waste-related studies. It was also found that many studies that use the term “qualitative research” do not have the necessary methodological rigor to be named. It was found that qualitative research is adequate to answer questions in the field of waste studies such as the relationship between waste and public health problems, difficulties in selective collection and other management / treatment actions, environmental impacts, irregular waste disposal and problems in the management of special waste. |
id |
RCAP_b7afa974811b0da804fbe4a51f482b08 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.publi.ludomedia.org:article/29 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Systematic review of qualitative studies in solid wasteRevisão sistemática de estudos qualitativos em resíduos sólidosSolid Waste; Qualitative Research; Literature Review.Resíduos Sólidos; Pesquisa Qualitativa; Revisão da Literatura.This work intends to analyze studies related to solid waste management developed with qualitative methods. A systematic literature review of the articles published between 2014 and 2019 was made in the Scielo databases (Scientific Electronic Library Online), in the CAPES Journal Portal and Web of Science. In addition to searching for reference journals in the area of waste (Waste Management and Waste Management and Research) through the descriptors “Qualitative Research” and “Solid Waste”; “Interview”, “Solid Waste” and “Perception” (Interviews, Solid Waste and Perception) and 598 articles were found, and after applying the selection criteria the universe was reduced to a total of 42 publications. The selected articles were analyzed and categorized according to the most relevant aspects such as work objectives, study sample and main results. Qualitative research has been found to be a viable tool and can be employed on a large scale in waste-related studies. It was also found that many studies that use the term “qualitative research” do not have the necessary methodological rigor to be named. It was found that qualitative research is adequate to answer questions in the field of waste studies such as the relationship between waste and public health problems, difficulties in selective collection and other management / treatment actions, environmental impacts, irregular waste disposal and problems in the management of special waste.O presente trabalho buscou analisar estudos relacionados à gestão de resíduos sólidos desenvolvidos com métodos qualitativos. Foi feita revisão sistemática da literatura publicada entre os anos de 2014 e 2019 nas bases de dados Scielo (Scientific Electronic Library Online), no Portal de Periódicos da CAPES e Web Of Science. Além da busca em periódicos de referência na área de resíduos (Waste Management e Waste Management and Research) por meio dos descritores “Pesquisa Qualitativa” e “Resíduos Sólidos” (Qualitative Research and Solid Waste); “Entrevista”, “Resíduos Sólidos” e “Percepção” (Interviews, Solid Waste and Perception). Foram encontrados 598 artigos, sendo que após a aplicação de critérios de seleção descritos no presente artigo, o universo foi reduzido para um total de 42 publicações. Os artigos selecionados foram analisados e categorizados quanto aos aspectos mais relevantes como objetivos do trabalho, amostra utilizada no estudo e principais resultados. Verificou-se que a pesquisa qualitativa é adequada para responder questionamentos no campo de estudos sobre resíduos tais como, a relação entre os resíduos e os problemas de saúde pública, as dificuldades na coleta seletiva e nas demais ações de gerenciamento/tratamento, os impactos ambientais do descarte irregular de resíduos e os problemas na gestão de resíduos especiais.Ludomedia2020-07-02info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.4.2020.55-66https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.4.2020.55-66New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 4 (2020): Qualitative Research in Social Sciences: advances and challenges; 55-66New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 4 (2020): Investigación cualitativa en ciencias sociales: avances y desafíos; 55-66New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 4 (2020): Investigação Qualitativa em Ciências Sociais: avanços e desafios; 55-662184-777010.36367/ntqr.4.2020reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://publi.ludomedia.org/index.php/ntqr/article/view/29https://publi.ludomedia.org/index.php/ntqr/article/view/29/24Mendez, Gabriel de PinnaMahler, Claudio FernandoTaquette, Stella Reginainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-08-13T09:12:00Zoai:ojs.publi.ludomedia.org:article/29Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:47:53.896045Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Systematic review of qualitative studies in solid waste Revisão sistemática de estudos qualitativos em resíduos sólidos |
title |
Systematic review of qualitative studies in solid waste |
spellingShingle |
Systematic review of qualitative studies in solid waste Mendez, Gabriel de Pinna Solid Waste; Qualitative Research; Literature Review. Resíduos Sólidos; Pesquisa Qualitativa; Revisão da Literatura. |
title_short |
Systematic review of qualitative studies in solid waste |
title_full |
Systematic review of qualitative studies in solid waste |
title_fullStr |
Systematic review of qualitative studies in solid waste |
title_full_unstemmed |
Systematic review of qualitative studies in solid waste |
title_sort |
Systematic review of qualitative studies in solid waste |
author |
Mendez, Gabriel de Pinna |
author_facet |
Mendez, Gabriel de Pinna Mahler, Claudio Fernando Taquette, Stella Regina |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mahler, Claudio Fernando Taquette, Stella Regina |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Mendez, Gabriel de Pinna Mahler, Claudio Fernando Taquette, Stella Regina |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Solid Waste; Qualitative Research; Literature Review. Resíduos Sólidos; Pesquisa Qualitativa; Revisão da Literatura. |
topic |
Solid Waste; Qualitative Research; Literature Review. Resíduos Sólidos; Pesquisa Qualitativa; Revisão da Literatura. |
description |
This work intends to analyze studies related to solid waste management developed with qualitative methods. A systematic literature review of the articles published between 2014 and 2019 was made in the Scielo databases (Scientific Electronic Library Online), in the CAPES Journal Portal and Web of Science. In addition to searching for reference journals in the area of waste (Waste Management and Waste Management and Research) through the descriptors “Qualitative Research” and “Solid Waste”; “Interview”, “Solid Waste” and “Perception” (Interviews, Solid Waste and Perception) and 598 articles were found, and after applying the selection criteria the universe was reduced to a total of 42 publications. The selected articles were analyzed and categorized according to the most relevant aspects such as work objectives, study sample and main results. Qualitative research has been found to be a viable tool and can be employed on a large scale in waste-related studies. It was also found that many studies that use the term “qualitative research” do not have the necessary methodological rigor to be named. It was found that qualitative research is adequate to answer questions in the field of waste studies such as the relationship between waste and public health problems, difficulties in selective collection and other management / treatment actions, environmental impacts, irregular waste disposal and problems in the management of special waste. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-07-02 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.4.2020.55-66 https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.4.2020.55-66 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.4.2020.55-66 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://publi.ludomedia.org/index.php/ntqr/article/view/29 https://publi.ludomedia.org/index.php/ntqr/article/view/29/24 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ludomedia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ludomedia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 4 (2020): Qualitative Research in Social Sciences: advances and challenges; 55-66 New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 4 (2020): Investigación cualitativa en ciencias sociales: avances y desafíos; 55-66 New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 4 (2020): Investigação Qualitativa em Ciências Sociais: avanços e desafios; 55-66 2184-7770 10.36367/ntqr.4.2020 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130346253451264 |