Discourse Networks and Dual Screening: Analyzing Roles, Content and Motivations in Political Twitter Conversations

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bossner, Felix
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Nagel, Melanie
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i2.2573
Resumo: The increasing relevance of social networking platforms is accompanied by a growing number of studies using digital trace data. However, most studies still lack further understanding of the data-generating process. This analytical gap can be directly attributed to the prevalence of quantitative approaches, as only qualitative work is able to generate these insights. The broad methodological toolset of Discourse Network Analysis addresses this shortcoming as it combines both qualitative and quantitative approaches. The present study therefore employs Discourse Network Analysis in order to (1) determine different user groups’ varying role as senders and recipients of targeted online conversations, (2) identify and compare Twitter users’ (simultaneous) reference to different forms of conversational Twitter content, and to (3) asses the motivation of @message authors to direct particular tweets at particular user groups. To this end, this study analyzes @messages during the BBC program ‘Question Time’ on 2nd of June 2017—the final media encounter of Prime Minister Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn in the context of the 2017 UK election campaign. We draw on the theoretical background of Maarten Hajer’s discourse coalitions approach in order to investigate the preconditions for the formation of discourse coalitions in new and emerging virtual discourse arenas. Thus, our work not only mirrors the focus in existing literature on Twitter usage during high-profile political media events, but also emphasizes Twitter’s unique features for interactive exchange. This article identifies different forms of meta-talk and policy issues, which vary in both their general popularity with Twitter users as well as their interconnectedness. Furthermore, our analysis uncovers the motivation behind the decisions of @message authors to send particular @messages to certain groups of Twitter users. Finally, we could establish that media events only temporarily affect the topical foci of @message authors.
id RCAP_b8ca941f34f6d5fcad55eafd3c242653
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2573
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Discourse Networks and Dual Screening: Analyzing Roles, Content and Motivations in Political Twitter ConversationsDiscourse Network Analysis; Jeremy Corbyn; political campaigns; Theresa May; TV debate; Twitter; UK electionsThe increasing relevance of social networking platforms is accompanied by a growing number of studies using digital trace data. However, most studies still lack further understanding of the data-generating process. This analytical gap can be directly attributed to the prevalence of quantitative approaches, as only qualitative work is able to generate these insights. The broad methodological toolset of Discourse Network Analysis addresses this shortcoming as it combines both qualitative and quantitative approaches. The present study therefore employs Discourse Network Analysis in order to (1) determine different user groups’ varying role as senders and recipients of targeted online conversations, (2) identify and compare Twitter users’ (simultaneous) reference to different forms of conversational Twitter content, and to (3) asses the motivation of @message authors to direct particular tweets at particular user groups. To this end, this study analyzes @messages during the BBC program ‘Question Time’ on 2nd of June 2017—the final media encounter of Prime Minister Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn in the context of the 2017 UK election campaign. We draw on the theoretical background of Maarten Hajer’s discourse coalitions approach in order to investigate the preconditions for the formation of discourse coalitions in new and emerging virtual discourse arenas. Thus, our work not only mirrors the focus in existing literature on Twitter usage during high-profile political media events, but also emphasizes Twitter’s unique features for interactive exchange. This article identifies different forms of meta-talk and policy issues, which vary in both their general popularity with Twitter users as well as their interconnectedness. Furthermore, our analysis uncovers the motivation behind the decisions of @message authors to send particular @messages to certain groups of Twitter users. Finally, we could establish that media events only temporarily affect the topical foci of @message authors.Cogitatio2020-06-02info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i2.2573oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2573Politics and Governance; Vol 8, No 2 (2020): Policy Debates and Discourse Network Analysis; 311-3252183-2463reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2573https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i2.2573https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2573/2573https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/downloadSuppFile/2573/1111Copyright (c) 2020 Felix Bossner, Melanie Nagelhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBossner, FelixNagel, Melanie2022-12-22T15:16:48Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2573Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:22:30.290750Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Discourse Networks and Dual Screening: Analyzing Roles, Content and Motivations in Political Twitter Conversations
title Discourse Networks and Dual Screening: Analyzing Roles, Content and Motivations in Political Twitter Conversations
spellingShingle Discourse Networks and Dual Screening: Analyzing Roles, Content and Motivations in Political Twitter Conversations
Bossner, Felix
Discourse Network Analysis; Jeremy Corbyn; political campaigns; Theresa May; TV debate; Twitter; UK elections
title_short Discourse Networks and Dual Screening: Analyzing Roles, Content and Motivations in Political Twitter Conversations
title_full Discourse Networks and Dual Screening: Analyzing Roles, Content and Motivations in Political Twitter Conversations
title_fullStr Discourse Networks and Dual Screening: Analyzing Roles, Content and Motivations in Political Twitter Conversations
title_full_unstemmed Discourse Networks and Dual Screening: Analyzing Roles, Content and Motivations in Political Twitter Conversations
title_sort Discourse Networks and Dual Screening: Analyzing Roles, Content and Motivations in Political Twitter Conversations
author Bossner, Felix
author_facet Bossner, Felix
Nagel, Melanie
author_role author
author2 Nagel, Melanie
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bossner, Felix
Nagel, Melanie
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Discourse Network Analysis; Jeremy Corbyn; political campaigns; Theresa May; TV debate; Twitter; UK elections
topic Discourse Network Analysis; Jeremy Corbyn; political campaigns; Theresa May; TV debate; Twitter; UK elections
description The increasing relevance of social networking platforms is accompanied by a growing number of studies using digital trace data. However, most studies still lack further understanding of the data-generating process. This analytical gap can be directly attributed to the prevalence of quantitative approaches, as only qualitative work is able to generate these insights. The broad methodological toolset of Discourse Network Analysis addresses this shortcoming as it combines both qualitative and quantitative approaches. The present study therefore employs Discourse Network Analysis in order to (1) determine different user groups’ varying role as senders and recipients of targeted online conversations, (2) identify and compare Twitter users’ (simultaneous) reference to different forms of conversational Twitter content, and to (3) asses the motivation of @message authors to direct particular tweets at particular user groups. To this end, this study analyzes @messages during the BBC program ‘Question Time’ on 2nd of June 2017—the final media encounter of Prime Minister Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn in the context of the 2017 UK election campaign. We draw on the theoretical background of Maarten Hajer’s discourse coalitions approach in order to investigate the preconditions for the formation of discourse coalitions in new and emerging virtual discourse arenas. Thus, our work not only mirrors the focus in existing literature on Twitter usage during high-profile political media events, but also emphasizes Twitter’s unique features for interactive exchange. This article identifies different forms of meta-talk and policy issues, which vary in both their general popularity with Twitter users as well as their interconnectedness. Furthermore, our analysis uncovers the motivation behind the decisions of @message authors to send particular @messages to certain groups of Twitter users. Finally, we could establish that media events only temporarily affect the topical foci of @message authors.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-06-02
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i2.2573
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2573
url https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i2.2573
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2573
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2573
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i2.2573
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2573/2573
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/downloadSuppFile/2573/1111
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Felix Bossner, Melanie Nagel
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Felix Bossner, Melanie Nagel
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Politics and Governance; Vol 8, No 2 (2020): Policy Debates and Discourse Network Analysis; 311-325
2183-2463
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130670408138752