(Un)acceptability of the clitic pronoun placement pattern in Brazilian Portuguese by educated speakers
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.26334/2183-9077/rapln10ano2023a14 |
Resumo: | Brazilian Portuguese prioritizes pre-verbal placement (proclisis) of its clitic pronouns. However, post-verbal placement (enclisis) has not been completely excluded from this variety, being acquired by means of schooling. This study aimed at evaluating the acceptability of both these possible clitic placements in sentences with and without proclisis triggers – elements that, according to the normative tradition (based on European Portuguese, whose clitic placement pattern is syntacticly restrained), give rise to proclisis (whereas enclisis obtains at their absence) – by means of an acceptability judgement test with a six-point scale carried out by 79 Brazilian Portuguese native speakers who had completed, at least, Secondary School. The results showed that, even though the items with proclisis have been better evaluated than the ones with enclisis, the enclitic placement was evaluated above the central point of the scale used in this study, indicating that it is, as well, an acceptable placement for those speakers. It is concluded that, although the classes regarding clitic placement revolve around teaching the students similar rules to those found in the European Portuguese syntax, it does not seem to allow them to develop the syntactic knowledge specific to proclisis and enclisis, probably because Brazilian Portuguese is the oral variety used in the classrooms and the clitic placement rules (and their application) are restricted to the written modality. |
id |
RCAP_b9381b28de078ab3f896a81e4c93e059 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs3.ojs.apl.pt:article/166 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
(Un)acceptability of the clitic pronoun placement pattern in Brazilian Portuguese by educated speakers(In)aceitabilidade do padrão de colocação dos pronomes clíticos no português brasileiro por falantes escolarizadosPortuguês brasileiropronomes clíticoscolocação pronominalteste de juízos de aceitabilidadeBrazilian Portugueseclitic pronounclitic placementacceptability judgement testBrazilian Portuguese prioritizes pre-verbal placement (proclisis) of its clitic pronouns. However, post-verbal placement (enclisis) has not been completely excluded from this variety, being acquired by means of schooling. This study aimed at evaluating the acceptability of both these possible clitic placements in sentences with and without proclisis triggers – elements that, according to the normative tradition (based on European Portuguese, whose clitic placement pattern is syntacticly restrained), give rise to proclisis (whereas enclisis obtains at their absence) – by means of an acceptability judgement test with a six-point scale carried out by 79 Brazilian Portuguese native speakers who had completed, at least, Secondary School. The results showed that, even though the items with proclisis have been better evaluated than the ones with enclisis, the enclitic placement was evaluated above the central point of the scale used in this study, indicating that it is, as well, an acceptable placement for those speakers. It is concluded that, although the classes regarding clitic placement revolve around teaching the students similar rules to those found in the European Portuguese syntax, it does not seem to allow them to develop the syntactic knowledge specific to proclisis and enclisis, probably because Brazilian Portuguese is the oral variety used in the classrooms and the clitic placement rules (and their application) are restricted to the written modality.O português brasileiro prioriza a colocação pré-verbal (próclise) dos seus pronomes clíticos. No entanto, a colocação pós-verbal (ênclise) não foi excluída por completo dessa variedade, sendo adquirida por meio da escolarização. Este estudo objetivou avaliar a aceitabilidade das diferentes possibilidades de colocação dos clíticos em frases com e sem proclisadores – elementos que, segundo a tradição normativa (baseada no português europeu, cujo padrão de colocação observa restrições sintáticas), desencadeiam a próclise (ao passo que se obtém a ênclise na sua ausência) – por meio de uma tarefa de juízos de aceitabilidade com uma escala de seis pontos aplicado a falantes nativos do português brasileiro que tivessem concluído pelo menos o Ensino Médio. Os resultados demonstraram que, ainda que os itens com próclise tenham sido mais bem avaliados do que os que continham a ênclise, a colocação enclítica foi avaliada acima do ponto central da escala usada no estudo, indicando que é, também, uma colocação aceitável pelos falantes. Conclui-se que, embora o ensino da ênclise nas salas de aula apresente aos alunos regras similares àquelas que se observam na sintaxe do português europeu, não parece desenvolver neles o conhecimento sintático restrito a cada possibilidade de colocação dos clíticos, muito provavelmente pelo facto de o português brasileiro ser a variedade oral em uso nas escolas e as regras (e a sua aplicação) ficarem restritas à modalidade escrita. Associação Portuguesa de Linguística2023-10-22info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.26334/2183-9077/rapln10ano2023a14https://doi.org/10.26334/2183-9077/rapln10ano2023a14Revista da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística; No. 10 (2023): Journal of the Portuguese Linguistics Association; 251–270Revista da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística; N.º 10 (2023): Revista da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística; 251–2702183-907710.26334/2183-9077/rapln10ano2023tdreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://ojs.apl.pt/index.php/rapl/article/view/166https://ojs.apl.pt/index.php/rapl/article/view/166/229Direitos de Autor (c) 2023 Ronan Pereirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPereira, Ronan2023-12-09T10:16:16Zoai:ojs3.ojs.apl.pt:article/166Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T21:26:03.685118Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
(Un)acceptability of the clitic pronoun placement pattern in Brazilian Portuguese by educated speakers (In)aceitabilidade do padrão de colocação dos pronomes clíticos no português brasileiro por falantes escolarizados |
title |
(Un)acceptability of the clitic pronoun placement pattern in Brazilian Portuguese by educated speakers |
spellingShingle |
(Un)acceptability of the clitic pronoun placement pattern in Brazilian Portuguese by educated speakers Pereira, Ronan Português brasileiro pronomes clíticos colocação pronominal teste de juízos de aceitabilidade Brazilian Portuguese clitic pronoun clitic placement acceptability judgement test |
title_short |
(Un)acceptability of the clitic pronoun placement pattern in Brazilian Portuguese by educated speakers |
title_full |
(Un)acceptability of the clitic pronoun placement pattern in Brazilian Portuguese by educated speakers |
title_fullStr |
(Un)acceptability of the clitic pronoun placement pattern in Brazilian Portuguese by educated speakers |
title_full_unstemmed |
(Un)acceptability of the clitic pronoun placement pattern in Brazilian Portuguese by educated speakers |
title_sort |
(Un)acceptability of the clitic pronoun placement pattern in Brazilian Portuguese by educated speakers |
author |
Pereira, Ronan |
author_facet |
Pereira, Ronan |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pereira, Ronan |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Português brasileiro pronomes clíticos colocação pronominal teste de juízos de aceitabilidade Brazilian Portuguese clitic pronoun clitic placement acceptability judgement test |
topic |
Português brasileiro pronomes clíticos colocação pronominal teste de juízos de aceitabilidade Brazilian Portuguese clitic pronoun clitic placement acceptability judgement test |
description |
Brazilian Portuguese prioritizes pre-verbal placement (proclisis) of its clitic pronouns. However, post-verbal placement (enclisis) has not been completely excluded from this variety, being acquired by means of schooling. This study aimed at evaluating the acceptability of both these possible clitic placements in sentences with and without proclisis triggers – elements that, according to the normative tradition (based on European Portuguese, whose clitic placement pattern is syntacticly restrained), give rise to proclisis (whereas enclisis obtains at their absence) – by means of an acceptability judgement test with a six-point scale carried out by 79 Brazilian Portuguese native speakers who had completed, at least, Secondary School. The results showed that, even though the items with proclisis have been better evaluated than the ones with enclisis, the enclitic placement was evaluated above the central point of the scale used in this study, indicating that it is, as well, an acceptable placement for those speakers. It is concluded that, although the classes regarding clitic placement revolve around teaching the students similar rules to those found in the European Portuguese syntax, it does not seem to allow them to develop the syntactic knowledge specific to proclisis and enclisis, probably because Brazilian Portuguese is the oral variety used in the classrooms and the clitic placement rules (and their application) are restricted to the written modality. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-10-22 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.26334/2183-9077/rapln10ano2023a14 https://doi.org/10.26334/2183-9077/rapln10ano2023a14 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.26334/2183-9077/rapln10ano2023a14 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.apl.pt/index.php/rapl/article/view/166 https://ojs.apl.pt/index.php/rapl/article/view/166/229 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2023 Ronan Pereira info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2023 Ronan Pereira |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Portuguesa de Linguística |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Portuguesa de Linguística |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística; No. 10 (2023): Journal of the Portuguese Linguistics Association; 251–270 Revista da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística; N.º 10 (2023): Revista da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística; 251–270 2183-9077 10.26334/2183-9077/rapln10ano2023td reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799134142501224448 |