Why generalized structured component analysis is not universally preferable to structural equation modeling
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | und |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10362/118662 |
Resumo: | Henseler, J. (2012). Why generalized structured component analysis is not universally preferable to structural equation modeling. Journal Of The Academy Of Marketing Science, 40(3), 402-413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0298-6 |
id |
RCAP_bc843944a0c4e7b63951c0eea8a9e72f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:run.unl.pt:10362/118662 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Why generalized structured component analysis is not universally preferable to structural equation modelingcomponentmodelingStructuralequationModelstructuredmisspecificationanalysisGeneralizedMediationGeneralized structured component analysisMediationModel misspecificationStructural equation modelingHenseler, J. (2012). Why generalized structured component analysis is not universally preferable to structural equation modeling. Journal Of The Academy Of Marketing Science, 40(3), 402-413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0298-6Generalized structured component analysis has emerged in marketing and psychometric literature as an alternative to structural equation modeling. A recent simulation study recommends that, in most cases, this analysis is preferable to structural equation modeling because it outperforms the latter when the model is misspecified. This article examines the characteristics of generalized structured component analysis and reveals that the surprising previous findings are attributable to an incomplete experimental design and an error incurred during the software implementation of generalized structured component analysis. Simulated data show that generalized structured component analysis provides inconsistent estimates. In some instances, model misspecification can nearly neutralize this inconsistency, but in others it will reinforce the inconsistency. Moreover, generalized structured component analysis is hardly suitable for mediation analysis because it substantially overestimates the direct effect. Thus, generalized structured component analysis cannot be recommended universally over structural equation modeling.NOVA Information Management School (NOVA IMS)RUNHenseler, Joerg2021-06-01T22:44:37Z2012-01-012012-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/118662und0092-0703PURE: 317871https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0298-6info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-03-11T05:01:30Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/118662Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:43:56.166854Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Why generalized structured component analysis is not universally preferable to structural equation modeling |
title |
Why generalized structured component analysis is not universally preferable to structural equation modeling |
spellingShingle |
Why generalized structured component analysis is not universally preferable to structural equation modeling Henseler, Joerg component modeling Structural equation Model structured misspecification analysis Generalized Mediation Generalized structured component analysis Mediation Model misspecification Structural equation modeling |
title_short |
Why generalized structured component analysis is not universally preferable to structural equation modeling |
title_full |
Why generalized structured component analysis is not universally preferable to structural equation modeling |
title_fullStr |
Why generalized structured component analysis is not universally preferable to structural equation modeling |
title_full_unstemmed |
Why generalized structured component analysis is not universally preferable to structural equation modeling |
title_sort |
Why generalized structured component analysis is not universally preferable to structural equation modeling |
author |
Henseler, Joerg |
author_facet |
Henseler, Joerg |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
NOVA Information Management School (NOVA IMS) RUN |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Henseler, Joerg |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
component modeling Structural equation Model structured misspecification analysis Generalized Mediation Generalized structured component analysis Mediation Model misspecification Structural equation modeling |
topic |
component modeling Structural equation Model structured misspecification analysis Generalized Mediation Generalized structured component analysis Mediation Model misspecification Structural equation modeling |
description |
Henseler, J. (2012). Why generalized structured component analysis is not universally preferable to structural equation modeling. Journal Of The Academy Of Marketing Science, 40(3), 402-413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0298-6 |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-01-01 2012-01-01T00:00:00Z 2021-06-01T22:44:37Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10362/118662 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10362/118662 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
und |
language |
und |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
0092-0703 PURE: 317871 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0298-6 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799138047905759232 |