Testing models of belief bias
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2018.11.001 |
Resumo: | Submitted 2015 |
id |
RCAP_bcea9f786483bb920b1f4184f793020d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:run.unl.pt:10362/57814 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Testing models of belief biasan experimentAffective expected utilityAnticipationBeliefsOptimismOverconfidencePessimismFinanceEconomics and EconometricsSubmitted 2015Optimistic beliefs affect important areas of economic decision making, yet direct knowledge on how belief biases operate remains limited. To better understand these biases I introduce a theoretical framework that trades off anticipatory benefits against two potential costs of forming biased beliefs: (1) material costs which result from poor decisions, of Brunnermeier and Parker (2005), and (2) direct psychological costs of distorting reality, of Bracha and Brown (2012). The experiment exploits the potential of the BDM elicitation procedure adopted to lotteries to distort beliefs in different directions, depending on which costs are most important. Relative to an elicitation procedure without distortionary incentives, beliefs are biased in the optimistic direction. Increasing payments for accuracy further increases belief reports, in many cases away from the truth, consistent with psychological costs of belief distortion. Yet the overall results suggest that such theories of optimism fail to explain how beliefs respond to financial incentives.NOVA School of Business and Economics (NOVA SBE)RUNCoutts, Alexander2019-01-17T23:43:06Z2019-012019-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2018.11.001eng0899-8256PURE: 6590399http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057417695&partnerID=8YFLogxKhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2018.11.001info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-03-11T04:27:53Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/57814Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:33:07.342573Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Testing models of belief bias an experiment |
title |
Testing models of belief bias |
spellingShingle |
Testing models of belief bias Coutts, Alexander Affective expected utility Anticipation Beliefs Optimism Overconfidence Pessimism Finance Economics and Econometrics |
title_short |
Testing models of belief bias |
title_full |
Testing models of belief bias |
title_fullStr |
Testing models of belief bias |
title_full_unstemmed |
Testing models of belief bias |
title_sort |
Testing models of belief bias |
author |
Coutts, Alexander |
author_facet |
Coutts, Alexander |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
NOVA School of Business and Economics (NOVA SBE) RUN |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Coutts, Alexander |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Affective expected utility Anticipation Beliefs Optimism Overconfidence Pessimism Finance Economics and Econometrics |
topic |
Affective expected utility Anticipation Beliefs Optimism Overconfidence Pessimism Finance Economics and Econometrics |
description |
Submitted 2015 |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-01-17T23:43:06Z 2019-01 2019-01-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2018.11.001 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2018.11.001 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
0899-8256 PURE: 6590399 http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057417695&partnerID=8YFLogxK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2018.11.001 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799137953421721600 |