Addressing Wildfire Risk in Forest Management Planning with Multiple Criteria Decision Making Methods
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
DOI: | 10.3390/su9020298 |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10174/21112 https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020298 |
Resumo: | Wildfires impact the outcomes of forest management plans. Addressing that impact is thus critical for effective forest ecosystem management planning. This paper presents research on the use of multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods that integrate wildfire risk in planning contexts characterized by multiple objectives. Specifically, an a posteriori preference modeling approach is developed that adds wildfire criteria to a set of objectives representing ecosystem services supply values. Wildfire risk criteria are derived from stand-level wildfire occurrence and damage models as well as from the characteristics of neighboring stands that may impact wildfire probability and spread. A forested landscape classified into 1976 stands is used for testing purposes. The management planning criteria include the carbon stock, harvest volumes for three forest species, the volume of the ending inventory, and resistance to wildfire risk indicators. Results show the potential of multiple criteria decision making methods to provide information about trade-offs between wildfire risk and the supply of provisioning (timber) as well as regulatory (carbon) ecosystem services. This information may contribute to the effectiveness of forest ecosystem management planning. |
id |
RCAP_bd92aa285039a2ca457760ca72ae2475 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/21112 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Addressing Wildfire Risk in Forest Management Planning with Multiple Criteria Decision Making Methodsmultiple criteria decision makingPareto frontier methodswildfire risk criteriaecosystem servicesWildfires impact the outcomes of forest management plans. Addressing that impact is thus critical for effective forest ecosystem management planning. This paper presents research on the use of multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods that integrate wildfire risk in planning contexts characterized by multiple objectives. Specifically, an a posteriori preference modeling approach is developed that adds wildfire criteria to a set of objectives representing ecosystem services supply values. Wildfire risk criteria are derived from stand-level wildfire occurrence and damage models as well as from the characteristics of neighboring stands that may impact wildfire probability and spread. A forested landscape classified into 1976 stands is used for testing purposes. The management planning criteria include the carbon stock, harvest volumes for three forest species, the volume of the ending inventory, and resistance to wildfire risk indicators. Results show the potential of multiple criteria decision making methods to provide information about trade-offs between wildfire risk and the supply of provisioning (timber) as well as regulatory (carbon) ecosystem services. This information may contribute to the effectiveness of forest ecosystem management planning.European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme; Portuguese Science Foundation.MDPI2017-06-20T12:02:04Z2017-06-202017-02-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10174/21112http://hdl.handle.net/10174/21112https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020298engS. Marques, M. Marto, V. Bushenkov, M. McDill, J.G. Borges. Addressing Wildfire Risk in Forest Management Planning with Multiple Criteria Decision Making Methods.- Sustainability, 2017, 9, 298.2071-1050http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/298ndndbushen@uevora.ptndnd339Marques, SuseteMarto, MarcoBushenkov, VladimirMcDill, MarcBorges, Joseinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-03T19:11:17Zoai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/21112Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:12:20.084415Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Addressing Wildfire Risk in Forest Management Planning with Multiple Criteria Decision Making Methods |
title |
Addressing Wildfire Risk in Forest Management Planning with Multiple Criteria Decision Making Methods |
spellingShingle |
Addressing Wildfire Risk in Forest Management Planning with Multiple Criteria Decision Making Methods Addressing Wildfire Risk in Forest Management Planning with Multiple Criteria Decision Making Methods Marques, Susete multiple criteria decision making Pareto frontier methods wildfire risk criteria ecosystem services Marques, Susete multiple criteria decision making Pareto frontier methods wildfire risk criteria ecosystem services |
title_short |
Addressing Wildfire Risk in Forest Management Planning with Multiple Criteria Decision Making Methods |
title_full |
Addressing Wildfire Risk in Forest Management Planning with Multiple Criteria Decision Making Methods |
title_fullStr |
Addressing Wildfire Risk in Forest Management Planning with Multiple Criteria Decision Making Methods Addressing Wildfire Risk in Forest Management Planning with Multiple Criteria Decision Making Methods |
title_full_unstemmed |
Addressing Wildfire Risk in Forest Management Planning with Multiple Criteria Decision Making Methods Addressing Wildfire Risk in Forest Management Planning with Multiple Criteria Decision Making Methods |
title_sort |
Addressing Wildfire Risk in Forest Management Planning with Multiple Criteria Decision Making Methods |
author |
Marques, Susete |
author_facet |
Marques, Susete Marques, Susete Marto, Marco Bushenkov, Vladimir McDill, Marc Borges, Jose Marto, Marco Bushenkov, Vladimir McDill, Marc Borges, Jose |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Marto, Marco Bushenkov, Vladimir McDill, Marc Borges, Jose |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Marques, Susete Marto, Marco Bushenkov, Vladimir McDill, Marc Borges, Jose |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
multiple criteria decision making Pareto frontier methods wildfire risk criteria ecosystem services |
topic |
multiple criteria decision making Pareto frontier methods wildfire risk criteria ecosystem services |
description |
Wildfires impact the outcomes of forest management plans. Addressing that impact is thus critical for effective forest ecosystem management planning. This paper presents research on the use of multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods that integrate wildfire risk in planning contexts characterized by multiple objectives. Specifically, an a posteriori preference modeling approach is developed that adds wildfire criteria to a set of objectives representing ecosystem services supply values. Wildfire risk criteria are derived from stand-level wildfire occurrence and damage models as well as from the characteristics of neighboring stands that may impact wildfire probability and spread. A forested landscape classified into 1976 stands is used for testing purposes. The management planning criteria include the carbon stock, harvest volumes for three forest species, the volume of the ending inventory, and resistance to wildfire risk indicators. Results show the potential of multiple criteria decision making methods to provide information about trade-offs between wildfire risk and the supply of provisioning (timber) as well as regulatory (carbon) ecosystem services. This information may contribute to the effectiveness of forest ecosystem management planning. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-06-20T12:02:04Z 2017-06-20 2017-02-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/21112 http://hdl.handle.net/10174/21112 https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020298 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/21112 https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020298 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
S. Marques, M. Marto, V. Bushenkov, M. McDill, J.G. Borges. Addressing Wildfire Risk in Forest Management Planning with Multiple Criteria Decision Making Methods.- Sustainability, 2017, 9, 298. 2071-1050 http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/298 nd nd bushen@uevora.pt nd nd 339 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
MDPI |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
MDPI |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1822239624451325952 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.3390/su9020298 |