Anaphylactic Reactions in the Emergency Department of a Portuguese Tertiary Hospital: Clinical Characterization and Disease Notification

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fróis, Ana Teresa
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Cardoso, Teresa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10820
Resumo: Introduction: Anaphylaxis is significantly underdiagnosed, and the medical community’s knowledge about it is precarious. The aim of this study is to characterize the patient population and the Emergency Department approach of anaphylaxis.Material and Methods: Retrospective study of adult patients attending the Emergency Department of a tertiary care Portuguese hospital, over a year, with anaphylaxis. Data were obtained from each patient’s clinical records and anonymized. A questionnaire evaluating knowledge about the notification of anaphylaxis was applied to Emergency Department physicians.Results: The study included 69 patients. Cutaneous (97%) and respiratory features (80%) were most prevalent; 22% of patients presented with shock or related symptoms. There were no reported biphasic reactions or deaths. The likely allergen was identified in 73%, most commonly food; 12% of reactions were related to a previously known allergen. Epinephrine was administered to 15%. Referral to an Immunoallergologist was done in 36% of patients, and 10% received or already possessed an epinephrine autoinjector. Among six parameters recommended for auditing clinical practice, 70% of cases fulfilled less than half. Only 13% of physicians knew it was mandatory to register all cases in the Portuguese Catalogue of Allergies and Other Adverse Reactions, and only 4% knew how to do it; regarding notification to the National Authority of Medicines and Health Products results were slightly better.Discussion: Many patients with anaphylaxis present to the Emergency Department every year, and their clinical approach is not in agreement with national guidelines. Conclusion: An educational program to increase medical awareness of the national guidelines and mandatory notification of all anaphylactic reactions should be implemented.
id RCAP_bf30fdc6bc196a0a659ca2c5c62e6ea7
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/10820
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Anaphylactic Reactions in the Emergency Department of a Portuguese Tertiary Hospital: Clinical Characterization and Disease NotificationReações Anafiláticas no Serviço de Urgência de um Hospital Terciário Português: Caracterização Clínica e NotificaçãoAnaphylaxis/epidemiologyAnaphylaxis/etiologyEmergency ServiceHospitalAnafilaxia/epidemiologiaAnafilaxia/etiologiaServiço de Urgência HospitalarIntroduction: Anaphylaxis is significantly underdiagnosed, and the medical community’s knowledge about it is precarious. The aim of this study is to characterize the patient population and the Emergency Department approach of anaphylaxis.Material and Methods: Retrospective study of adult patients attending the Emergency Department of a tertiary care Portuguese hospital, over a year, with anaphylaxis. Data were obtained from each patient’s clinical records and anonymized. A questionnaire evaluating knowledge about the notification of anaphylaxis was applied to Emergency Department physicians.Results: The study included 69 patients. Cutaneous (97%) and respiratory features (80%) were most prevalent; 22% of patients presented with shock or related symptoms. There were no reported biphasic reactions or deaths. The likely allergen was identified in 73%, most commonly food; 12% of reactions were related to a previously known allergen. Epinephrine was administered to 15%. Referral to an Immunoallergologist was done in 36% of patients, and 10% received or already possessed an epinephrine autoinjector. Among six parameters recommended for auditing clinical practice, 70% of cases fulfilled less than half. Only 13% of physicians knew it was mandatory to register all cases in the Portuguese Catalogue of Allergies and Other Adverse Reactions, and only 4% knew how to do it; regarding notification to the National Authority of Medicines and Health Products results were slightly better.Discussion: Many patients with anaphylaxis present to the Emergency Department every year, and their clinical approach is not in agreement with national guidelines. Conclusion: An educational program to increase medical awareness of the national guidelines and mandatory notification of all anaphylactic reactions should be implemented.Introdução: A anafilaxia é significativamente subdiagnosticada e o conhecimento médico acerca da mesma é precário. Pretende-se caracterizar a população de doentes e a abordagem clínica da anafilaxia no Serviço de Urgência.Material e Métodos: Estudo retrospetivo da população adulta que recorreu ao Serviço de Urgência de um hospital terciário português durante um ano, com anafilaxia. Os dados foram obtidos dos registos clínicos de cada paciente e anonimizados. Um questionário para avaliar conhecimentos sobre notificação de reações anafiláticas foi aplicado aos médicos do Serviço de Urgência.Resultados: O estudo incluiu 69 doentes. Os sintomas cutâneos (97%) e respiratórios (80%) foram os mais prevalentes; 22% apresentaram-se com choque ou sintomas associados. Não se registaram reações bifásicas ou óbitos. O alergénio provável foi identificado em 73%; maioritariamente foram alimentos; 12% das reações foram com um alergénio previamente conhecido. Adrenalina foi administrada em 15%; 36% foram encaminhados para Imunoalergologia; 10% receberam ou já possuíam adrenalina autoinjetável. Em 70% dos casos, menos de metade dos seis parâmetros das Normas de Orientação Clínica foram cumpridos. Apenas 13% dos médicos sabia que era obrigatório registar todos os casos no Catálogo Português de Alergias e Outras Reações Adversas e apenas 4% sabiam como fazê-lo; relativamente à notificação das reações a fármacos à Autoridade Nacional do Medicamento e Produtos de Saúde, I.P., obtiveram-se resultados ligeiramente melhores. Discussão: Muitos doentes recorrem ao Serviço de Urgência com reações anafiláticas e a sua abordagem não está em concordância com as normas de orientação clínica nacionais. Conclusão: É necessário implementar ações de formação relativamente à abordagem clínica e notificação da anafilaxia.Ordem dos Médicos2019-02-28info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/mswordapplication/pdfhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10820oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/10820Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 32 No. 2 (2019): February; 91-100Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 32 N.º 2 (2019): Fevereiro; 91-1001646-07580870-399Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10820https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10820/5608https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10820/10751https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10820/10767https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10820/10875Direitos de Autor (c) 2019 Acta Médica Portuguesainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFróis, Ana TeresaCardoso, Teresa2022-12-20T11:06:05Zoai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/10820Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:19:56.931616Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Anaphylactic Reactions in the Emergency Department of a Portuguese Tertiary Hospital: Clinical Characterization and Disease Notification
Reações Anafiláticas no Serviço de Urgência de um Hospital Terciário Português: Caracterização Clínica e Notificação
title Anaphylactic Reactions in the Emergency Department of a Portuguese Tertiary Hospital: Clinical Characterization and Disease Notification
spellingShingle Anaphylactic Reactions in the Emergency Department of a Portuguese Tertiary Hospital: Clinical Characterization and Disease Notification
Fróis, Ana Teresa
Anaphylaxis/epidemiology
Anaphylaxis/etiology
Emergency Service
Hospital
Anafilaxia/epidemiologia
Anafilaxia/etiologia
Serviço de Urgência Hospitalar
title_short Anaphylactic Reactions in the Emergency Department of a Portuguese Tertiary Hospital: Clinical Characterization and Disease Notification
title_full Anaphylactic Reactions in the Emergency Department of a Portuguese Tertiary Hospital: Clinical Characterization and Disease Notification
title_fullStr Anaphylactic Reactions in the Emergency Department of a Portuguese Tertiary Hospital: Clinical Characterization and Disease Notification
title_full_unstemmed Anaphylactic Reactions in the Emergency Department of a Portuguese Tertiary Hospital: Clinical Characterization and Disease Notification
title_sort Anaphylactic Reactions in the Emergency Department of a Portuguese Tertiary Hospital: Clinical Characterization and Disease Notification
author Fróis, Ana Teresa
author_facet Fróis, Ana Teresa
Cardoso, Teresa
author_role author
author2 Cardoso, Teresa
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fróis, Ana Teresa
Cardoso, Teresa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Anaphylaxis/epidemiology
Anaphylaxis/etiology
Emergency Service
Hospital
Anafilaxia/epidemiologia
Anafilaxia/etiologia
Serviço de Urgência Hospitalar
topic Anaphylaxis/epidemiology
Anaphylaxis/etiology
Emergency Service
Hospital
Anafilaxia/epidemiologia
Anafilaxia/etiologia
Serviço de Urgência Hospitalar
description Introduction: Anaphylaxis is significantly underdiagnosed, and the medical community’s knowledge about it is precarious. The aim of this study is to characterize the patient population and the Emergency Department approach of anaphylaxis.Material and Methods: Retrospective study of adult patients attending the Emergency Department of a tertiary care Portuguese hospital, over a year, with anaphylaxis. Data were obtained from each patient’s clinical records and anonymized. A questionnaire evaluating knowledge about the notification of anaphylaxis was applied to Emergency Department physicians.Results: The study included 69 patients. Cutaneous (97%) and respiratory features (80%) were most prevalent; 22% of patients presented with shock or related symptoms. There were no reported biphasic reactions or deaths. The likely allergen was identified in 73%, most commonly food; 12% of reactions were related to a previously known allergen. Epinephrine was administered to 15%. Referral to an Immunoallergologist was done in 36% of patients, and 10% received or already possessed an epinephrine autoinjector. Among six parameters recommended for auditing clinical practice, 70% of cases fulfilled less than half. Only 13% of physicians knew it was mandatory to register all cases in the Portuguese Catalogue of Allergies and Other Adverse Reactions, and only 4% knew how to do it; regarding notification to the National Authority of Medicines and Health Products results were slightly better.Discussion: Many patients with anaphylaxis present to the Emergency Department every year, and their clinical approach is not in agreement with national guidelines. Conclusion: An educational program to increase medical awareness of the national guidelines and mandatory notification of all anaphylactic reactions should be implemented.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-02-28
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10820
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/10820
url https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10820
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/10820
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10820
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10820/5608
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10820/10751
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10820/10767
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10820/10875
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2019 Acta Médica Portuguesa
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2019 Acta Médica Portuguesa
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/msword
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 32 No. 2 (2019): February; 91-100
Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 32 N.º 2 (2019): Fevereiro; 91-100
1646-0758
0870-399X
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1817552631840636928