Anaphylactic Reactions in the Emergency Department of a Portuguese Tertiary Hospital: Clinical Characterization and Disease Notification
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10820 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Anaphylaxis is significantly underdiagnosed, and the medical community’s knowledge about it is precarious. The aim of this study is to characterize the patient population and the Emergency Department approach of anaphylaxis.Material and Methods: Retrospective study of adult patients attending the Emergency Department of a tertiary care Portuguese hospital, over a year, with anaphylaxis. Data were obtained from each patient’s clinical records and anonymized. A questionnaire evaluating knowledge about the notification of anaphylaxis was applied to Emergency Department physicians.Results: The study included 69 patients. Cutaneous (97%) and respiratory features (80%) were most prevalent; 22% of patients presented with shock or related symptoms. There were no reported biphasic reactions or deaths. The likely allergen was identified in 73%, most commonly food; 12% of reactions were related to a previously known allergen. Epinephrine was administered to 15%. Referral to an Immunoallergologist was done in 36% of patients, and 10% received or already possessed an epinephrine autoinjector. Among six parameters recommended for auditing clinical practice, 70% of cases fulfilled less than half. Only 13% of physicians knew it was mandatory to register all cases in the Portuguese Catalogue of Allergies and Other Adverse Reactions, and only 4% knew how to do it; regarding notification to the National Authority of Medicines and Health Products results were slightly better.Discussion: Many patients with anaphylaxis present to the Emergency Department every year, and their clinical approach is not in agreement with national guidelines. Conclusion: An educational program to increase medical awareness of the national guidelines and mandatory notification of all anaphylactic reactions should be implemented. |
id |
RCAP_bf30fdc6bc196a0a659ca2c5c62e6ea7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/10820 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Anaphylactic Reactions in the Emergency Department of a Portuguese Tertiary Hospital: Clinical Characterization and Disease NotificationReações Anafiláticas no Serviço de Urgência de um Hospital Terciário Português: Caracterização Clínica e NotificaçãoAnaphylaxis/epidemiologyAnaphylaxis/etiologyEmergency ServiceHospitalAnafilaxia/epidemiologiaAnafilaxia/etiologiaServiço de Urgência HospitalarIntroduction: Anaphylaxis is significantly underdiagnosed, and the medical community’s knowledge about it is precarious. The aim of this study is to characterize the patient population and the Emergency Department approach of anaphylaxis.Material and Methods: Retrospective study of adult patients attending the Emergency Department of a tertiary care Portuguese hospital, over a year, with anaphylaxis. Data were obtained from each patient’s clinical records and anonymized. A questionnaire evaluating knowledge about the notification of anaphylaxis was applied to Emergency Department physicians.Results: The study included 69 patients. Cutaneous (97%) and respiratory features (80%) were most prevalent; 22% of patients presented with shock or related symptoms. There were no reported biphasic reactions or deaths. The likely allergen was identified in 73%, most commonly food; 12% of reactions were related to a previously known allergen. Epinephrine was administered to 15%. Referral to an Immunoallergologist was done in 36% of patients, and 10% received or already possessed an epinephrine autoinjector. Among six parameters recommended for auditing clinical practice, 70% of cases fulfilled less than half. Only 13% of physicians knew it was mandatory to register all cases in the Portuguese Catalogue of Allergies and Other Adverse Reactions, and only 4% knew how to do it; regarding notification to the National Authority of Medicines and Health Products results were slightly better.Discussion: Many patients with anaphylaxis present to the Emergency Department every year, and their clinical approach is not in agreement with national guidelines. Conclusion: An educational program to increase medical awareness of the national guidelines and mandatory notification of all anaphylactic reactions should be implemented.Introdução: A anafilaxia é significativamente subdiagnosticada e o conhecimento médico acerca da mesma é precário. Pretende-se caracterizar a população de doentes e a abordagem clínica da anafilaxia no Serviço de Urgência.Material e Métodos: Estudo retrospetivo da população adulta que recorreu ao Serviço de Urgência de um hospital terciário português durante um ano, com anafilaxia. Os dados foram obtidos dos registos clínicos de cada paciente e anonimizados. Um questionário para avaliar conhecimentos sobre notificação de reações anafiláticas foi aplicado aos médicos do Serviço de Urgência.Resultados: O estudo incluiu 69 doentes. Os sintomas cutâneos (97%) e respiratórios (80%) foram os mais prevalentes; 22% apresentaram-se com choque ou sintomas associados. Não se registaram reações bifásicas ou óbitos. O alergénio provável foi identificado em 73%; maioritariamente foram alimentos; 12% das reações foram com um alergénio previamente conhecido. Adrenalina foi administrada em 15%; 36% foram encaminhados para Imunoalergologia; 10% receberam ou já possuíam adrenalina autoinjetável. Em 70% dos casos, menos de metade dos seis parâmetros das Normas de Orientação Clínica foram cumpridos. Apenas 13% dos médicos sabia que era obrigatório registar todos os casos no Catálogo Português de Alergias e Outras Reações Adversas e apenas 4% sabiam como fazê-lo; relativamente à notificação das reações a fármacos à Autoridade Nacional do Medicamento e Produtos de Saúde, I.P., obtiveram-se resultados ligeiramente melhores. Discussão: Muitos doentes recorrem ao Serviço de Urgência com reações anafiláticas e a sua abordagem não está em concordância com as normas de orientação clínica nacionais. Conclusão: É necessário implementar ações de formação relativamente à abordagem clínica e notificação da anafilaxia.Ordem dos Médicos2019-02-28info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/mswordapplication/pdfhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10820oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/10820Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 32 No. 2 (2019): February; 91-100Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 32 N.º 2 (2019): Fevereiro; 91-1001646-07580870-399Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10820https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10820/5608https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10820/10751https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10820/10767https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10820/10875Direitos de Autor (c) 2019 Acta Médica Portuguesainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFróis, Ana TeresaCardoso, Teresa2022-12-20T11:06:05Zoai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/10820Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:19:56.931616Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Anaphylactic Reactions in the Emergency Department of a Portuguese Tertiary Hospital: Clinical Characterization and Disease Notification Reações Anafiláticas no Serviço de Urgência de um Hospital Terciário Português: Caracterização Clínica e Notificação |
title |
Anaphylactic Reactions in the Emergency Department of a Portuguese Tertiary Hospital: Clinical Characterization and Disease Notification |
spellingShingle |
Anaphylactic Reactions in the Emergency Department of a Portuguese Tertiary Hospital: Clinical Characterization and Disease Notification Fróis, Ana Teresa Anaphylaxis/epidemiology Anaphylaxis/etiology Emergency Service Hospital Anafilaxia/epidemiologia Anafilaxia/etiologia Serviço de Urgência Hospitalar |
title_short |
Anaphylactic Reactions in the Emergency Department of a Portuguese Tertiary Hospital: Clinical Characterization and Disease Notification |
title_full |
Anaphylactic Reactions in the Emergency Department of a Portuguese Tertiary Hospital: Clinical Characterization and Disease Notification |
title_fullStr |
Anaphylactic Reactions in the Emergency Department of a Portuguese Tertiary Hospital: Clinical Characterization and Disease Notification |
title_full_unstemmed |
Anaphylactic Reactions in the Emergency Department of a Portuguese Tertiary Hospital: Clinical Characterization and Disease Notification |
title_sort |
Anaphylactic Reactions in the Emergency Department of a Portuguese Tertiary Hospital: Clinical Characterization and Disease Notification |
author |
Fróis, Ana Teresa |
author_facet |
Fróis, Ana Teresa Cardoso, Teresa |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cardoso, Teresa |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Fróis, Ana Teresa Cardoso, Teresa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Anaphylaxis/epidemiology Anaphylaxis/etiology Emergency Service Hospital Anafilaxia/epidemiologia Anafilaxia/etiologia Serviço de Urgência Hospitalar |
topic |
Anaphylaxis/epidemiology Anaphylaxis/etiology Emergency Service Hospital Anafilaxia/epidemiologia Anafilaxia/etiologia Serviço de Urgência Hospitalar |
description |
Introduction: Anaphylaxis is significantly underdiagnosed, and the medical community’s knowledge about it is precarious. The aim of this study is to characterize the patient population and the Emergency Department approach of anaphylaxis.Material and Methods: Retrospective study of adult patients attending the Emergency Department of a tertiary care Portuguese hospital, over a year, with anaphylaxis. Data were obtained from each patient’s clinical records and anonymized. A questionnaire evaluating knowledge about the notification of anaphylaxis was applied to Emergency Department physicians.Results: The study included 69 patients. Cutaneous (97%) and respiratory features (80%) were most prevalent; 22% of patients presented with shock or related symptoms. There were no reported biphasic reactions or deaths. The likely allergen was identified in 73%, most commonly food; 12% of reactions were related to a previously known allergen. Epinephrine was administered to 15%. Referral to an Immunoallergologist was done in 36% of patients, and 10% received or already possessed an epinephrine autoinjector. Among six parameters recommended for auditing clinical practice, 70% of cases fulfilled less than half. Only 13% of physicians knew it was mandatory to register all cases in the Portuguese Catalogue of Allergies and Other Adverse Reactions, and only 4% knew how to do it; regarding notification to the National Authority of Medicines and Health Products results were slightly better.Discussion: Many patients with anaphylaxis present to the Emergency Department every year, and their clinical approach is not in agreement with national guidelines. Conclusion: An educational program to increase medical awareness of the national guidelines and mandatory notification of all anaphylactic reactions should be implemented. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-02-28 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10820 oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/10820 |
url |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10820 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/10820 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10820 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10820/5608 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10820/10751 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10820/10767 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/10820/10875 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2019 Acta Médica Portuguesa info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2019 Acta Médica Portuguesa |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/msword application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ordem dos Médicos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ordem dos Médicos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 32 No. 2 (2019): February; 91-100 Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 32 N.º 2 (2019): Fevereiro; 91-100 1646-0758 0870-399X reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130649182863360 |