Sparse distributed representations as word embeddings for language understanding

• Autor(a) principal: Silva, André de Vasconcelos Santos
• Data de Publicação: 2018
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
• Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/18245
• topic: Word embedding; Distributional semantic model; Text clustering; Binary sparse vectors; Neural networks; Redes neuronais; Análise vetorial

Word embeddings are vector representations of words that capture semantic and syntactic similarities between them. Similar words tend to have closer vector representations in a N dimensional space considering, for instance, Euclidean distance between the points associated with the word vector representations in a continuous vector space. This property, makes word embeddings valuable in several Natural Language Processing tasks, from word analogy and similarity evaluation to the more complex text categorization, summarization or translation tasks. Typically state of the art word embeddings are dense vector representations, with low dimensionality varying from tens to hundreds of floating number dimensions, usually obtained from unsupervised learning on considerable amounts of text data by training and optimizing an objective function of a neural network. This work presents a methodology to derive word embeddings as binary sparse vectors, or word vector representations with high dimensionality, sparse representation and binary features (e.g. composed only by ones and zeros). The proposed methodology tries to overcome some disadvantages associated with state of the art approaches, namely the size of corpus needed for training the model, while presenting comparable evaluations in several Natural Language Processing tasks. Results show that high dimensionality sparse binary vectors representations, obtained from a very limited amount of training data, achieve comparable performances in similarity and categorization intrinsic tasks, whereas in analogy tasks good results are obtained only for nouns categories. Our embeddings outperformed eight state of the art word embeddings in word similarity tasks, and two word embeddings in categorization tasks.