Evaluation of the Interfaces between Restorative and Regenerative Biomaterials Used in Vital Pulp Therapy

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Xavier, Maria Teresa
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Costa, Ana Luísa, Caramelo, Francisco José, Palma, Paulo Jorge, Ramos, João Carlos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10316/95940
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14175055
Resumo: Background: Calcium-silicate-based cements (CSC) have gained an increasing scientific and clinical relevance, enabling more conservative approaches, namely pulp preservation and regeneration therapies. This research aims to study the influence of four clinical variables on the interfaces between CSC and composite adhesive restoration, concerning shear bond strength (SBS) and ultra-morphological patterns. Methods: SBS tests were performed in 320 specimens divided in 16 groups (n = 20) according to: two CSC (NuSmile® NeoMTA, Biodentine™); two adhesive systems (Clearfil™ SE Bond 2 (CSEB2), Clearfil™ Universal Bond Quick (CUBQ)); optional application of an additional hydrophobic bonding layer (HBL); two restoration times (immediate, seven days). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed to conduct the ultra-morphology interface analysis in 32 deciduous molars prepared and randomly allocated into the 16 groups. Results: Globally, SBS tests showed higher bond strength of CUBQ compared to CSEB2 (p < 0.001), as with an additional HBL application (p = 0.014) and delayed restoration (p < 0.001). SEM showed the interpenetration between adhesive systems and CSC forming a hybrid layer, whose depth and thickness depended on the restoration time and adhesive strategy. Conclusions: The independent clinical variables adhesive system, application of an additional HBL and restoration time affected the bond performance and ultra-morphological interface between composite adhesive restoration and CSC. © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
id RCAP_c35f0b59d0c1e5a3bfb6ef3f4718f32c
oai_identifier_str oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/95940
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Evaluation of the Interfaces between Restorative and Regenerative Biomaterials Used in Vital Pulp TherapyAdhesionAdhesive systemsCalcium silicate cementsDirect pulp cappingPulpotomyScanning electron microscopyVital pulp treatmentBackground: Calcium-silicate-based cements (CSC) have gained an increasing scientific and clinical relevance, enabling more conservative approaches, namely pulp preservation and regeneration therapies. This research aims to study the influence of four clinical variables on the interfaces between CSC and composite adhesive restoration, concerning shear bond strength (SBS) and ultra-morphological patterns. Methods: SBS tests were performed in 320 specimens divided in 16 groups (n = 20) according to: two CSC (NuSmile® NeoMTA, Biodentine™); two adhesive systems (Clearfil™ SE Bond 2 (CSEB2), Clearfil™ Universal Bond Quick (CUBQ)); optional application of an additional hydrophobic bonding layer (HBL); two restoration times (immediate, seven days). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed to conduct the ultra-morphology interface analysis in 32 deciduous molars prepared and randomly allocated into the 16 groups. Results: Globally, SBS tests showed higher bond strength of CUBQ compared to CSEB2 (p < 0.001), as with an additional HBL application (p = 0.014) and delayed restoration (p < 0.001). SEM showed the interpenetration between adhesive systems and CSC forming a hybrid layer, whose depth and thickness depended on the restoration time and adhesive strategy. Conclusions: The independent clinical variables adhesive system, application of an additional HBL and restoration time affected the bond performance and ultra-morphological interface between composite adhesive restoration and CSC. © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.This work was partially supported by the Research Support Office, Faculty of Medicine of the University of Coimbra. The authors thank the Laboratory of Biomechanical Testing for the shear bond strength analysis, the Department of Materials and Ceramic Engineering (DEMaC) for Scanning Electron Microscope and VOCO® GmbH, Cuxhaven, Germany and NuSmile Ltd. Houston, TX, USA for some material donation.MDPI2021-09-03info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10316/95940http://hdl.handle.net/10316/95940https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14175055eng1996-1944Xavier, Maria TeresaCosta, Ana LuísaCaramelo, Francisco JoséPalma, Paulo JorgeRamos, João Carlosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-05-25T02:59:22Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/95940Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T21:14:20.006058Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of the Interfaces between Restorative and Regenerative Biomaterials Used in Vital Pulp Therapy
title Evaluation of the Interfaces between Restorative and Regenerative Biomaterials Used in Vital Pulp Therapy
spellingShingle Evaluation of the Interfaces between Restorative and Regenerative Biomaterials Used in Vital Pulp Therapy
Xavier, Maria Teresa
Adhesion
Adhesive systems
Calcium silicate cements
Direct pulp capping
Pulpotomy
Scanning electron microscopy
Vital pulp treatment
title_short Evaluation of the Interfaces between Restorative and Regenerative Biomaterials Used in Vital Pulp Therapy
title_full Evaluation of the Interfaces between Restorative and Regenerative Biomaterials Used in Vital Pulp Therapy
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Interfaces between Restorative and Regenerative Biomaterials Used in Vital Pulp Therapy
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Interfaces between Restorative and Regenerative Biomaterials Used in Vital Pulp Therapy
title_sort Evaluation of the Interfaces between Restorative and Regenerative Biomaterials Used in Vital Pulp Therapy
author Xavier, Maria Teresa
author_facet Xavier, Maria Teresa
Costa, Ana Luísa
Caramelo, Francisco José
Palma, Paulo Jorge
Ramos, João Carlos
author_role author
author2 Costa, Ana Luísa
Caramelo, Francisco José
Palma, Paulo Jorge
Ramos, João Carlos
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Xavier, Maria Teresa
Costa, Ana Luísa
Caramelo, Francisco José
Palma, Paulo Jorge
Ramos, João Carlos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Adhesion
Adhesive systems
Calcium silicate cements
Direct pulp capping
Pulpotomy
Scanning electron microscopy
Vital pulp treatment
topic Adhesion
Adhesive systems
Calcium silicate cements
Direct pulp capping
Pulpotomy
Scanning electron microscopy
Vital pulp treatment
description Background: Calcium-silicate-based cements (CSC) have gained an increasing scientific and clinical relevance, enabling more conservative approaches, namely pulp preservation and regeneration therapies. This research aims to study the influence of four clinical variables on the interfaces between CSC and composite adhesive restoration, concerning shear bond strength (SBS) and ultra-morphological patterns. Methods: SBS tests were performed in 320 specimens divided in 16 groups (n = 20) according to: two CSC (NuSmile® NeoMTA, Biodentine™); two adhesive systems (Clearfil™ SE Bond 2 (CSEB2), Clearfil™ Universal Bond Quick (CUBQ)); optional application of an additional hydrophobic bonding layer (HBL); two restoration times (immediate, seven days). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed to conduct the ultra-morphology interface analysis in 32 deciduous molars prepared and randomly allocated into the 16 groups. Results: Globally, SBS tests showed higher bond strength of CUBQ compared to CSEB2 (p < 0.001), as with an additional HBL application (p = 0.014) and delayed restoration (p < 0.001). SEM showed the interpenetration between adhesive systems and CSC forming a hybrid layer, whose depth and thickness depended on the restoration time and adhesive strategy. Conclusions: The independent clinical variables adhesive system, application of an additional HBL and restoration time affected the bond performance and ultra-morphological interface between composite adhesive restoration and CSC. © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-09-03
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10316/95940
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/95940
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14175055
url http://hdl.handle.net/10316/95940
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14175055
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1996-1944
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134040584880128