Outcomes of Parenchyma-Preserving Hepatectomy and Right Hepatectomy for Solitary Small Colorectal Liver Metastasis: A LiverMetSurvey Study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/3204 |
Resumo: | BACKGROUND: Occasionally, right hepatectomy, rather than parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy, has been performed for solitary small colorectal liver metastasis. The relative oncologic benefits of parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy and right hepatectomy are unclear. This study compared the outcomes of patients with solitary small colorectal liver metastasis in the right liver who underwent parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy and those who underwent right hepatectomy. METHODS: The study population consisted of a multicentric cohort of 21,072 patients operated for colorectal liver metastasis between 2000 and 2015 whose data were collected in the LiverMetSurvey registry. Patients with a pathologically confirmed solitary tumor of less than 30 mm in size in the right liver were included. The short- and long-term outcomes of patients who underwent parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy were compared to those of patients who underwent right hepatectomy. RESULTS: Of the 1,720 patients who were eligible for the study, 1,478 (86%) underwent parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy and 242 (14%) underwent right hepatectomy. The parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy group was associated with lower rates of major complications (3% vs 10%; P < .001) and 90-day mortality (1% vs 3%; P = .008). Liver recurrence occurred similarly in both groups (20% vs 22%; P = .39). The 5-year recurrence-free survival and overall survival rates were similar in both groups. However, in patients with liver-only recurrence, repeat hepatectomy was more frequently performed in the parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy group than in the right hepatectomy group (67% vs 31%; P < .001), and the overall 5-year survival rate was significantly higher in the parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy group than in the right hepatectomy group (55% vs 23%; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy should be considered the standard procedure for solitary small colorectal liver metastasis in the right liver when technically feasible. |
id |
RCAP_c4af2ca00948ccf34ffd8f74085392e6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.chlc.pt:10400.17/3204 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Outcomes of Parenchyma-Preserving Hepatectomy and Right Hepatectomy for Solitary Small Colorectal Liver Metastasis: A LiverMetSurvey StudyAgedCohort StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHepatectomyHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeHCC CHBPTBACKGROUND: Occasionally, right hepatectomy, rather than parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy, has been performed for solitary small colorectal liver metastasis. The relative oncologic benefits of parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy and right hepatectomy are unclear. This study compared the outcomes of patients with solitary small colorectal liver metastasis in the right liver who underwent parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy and those who underwent right hepatectomy. METHODS: The study population consisted of a multicentric cohort of 21,072 patients operated for colorectal liver metastasis between 2000 and 2015 whose data were collected in the LiverMetSurvey registry. Patients with a pathologically confirmed solitary tumor of less than 30 mm in size in the right liver were included. The short- and long-term outcomes of patients who underwent parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy were compared to those of patients who underwent right hepatectomy. RESULTS: Of the 1,720 patients who were eligible for the study, 1,478 (86%) underwent parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy and 242 (14%) underwent right hepatectomy. The parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy group was associated with lower rates of major complications (3% vs 10%; P < .001) and 90-day mortality (1% vs 3%; P = .008). Liver recurrence occurred similarly in both groups (20% vs 22%; P = .39). The 5-year recurrence-free survival and overall survival rates were similar in both groups. However, in patients with liver-only recurrence, repeat hepatectomy was more frequently performed in the parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy group than in the right hepatectomy group (67% vs 31%; P < .001), and the overall 5-year survival rate was significantly higher in the parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy group than in the right hepatectomy group (55% vs 23%; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy should be considered the standard procedure for solitary small colorectal liver metastasis in the right liver when technically feasible.ElsevierRepositório do Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, EPEHosokawa, IAllard, MAMirza, DFKaiser, GBarroso, ELapointe, RLaurent, CFerrero, AMiyazaki, MAdam, R2019-03-20T16:42:33Z20172017-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/3204engSurgery. 2017 Aug;162(2):223-232.10.1016/j.surg.2017.02.012info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-10-28T10:28:45Zoai:repositorio.chlc.pt:10400.17/3204Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openairemluisa.alvim@gmail.comopendoar:71602024-10-28T10:28:45Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Outcomes of Parenchyma-Preserving Hepatectomy and Right Hepatectomy for Solitary Small Colorectal Liver Metastasis: A LiverMetSurvey Study |
title |
Outcomes of Parenchyma-Preserving Hepatectomy and Right Hepatectomy for Solitary Small Colorectal Liver Metastasis: A LiverMetSurvey Study |
spellingShingle |
Outcomes of Parenchyma-Preserving Hepatectomy and Right Hepatectomy for Solitary Small Colorectal Liver Metastasis: A LiverMetSurvey Study Hosokawa, I Aged Cohort Studies Colorectal Neoplasms Disease-Free Survival Female Hepatectomy Humans Liver Neoplasms Male Middle Aged Neoplasm Recurrence, Local Survival Rate Treatment Outcome HCC CHBPT |
title_short |
Outcomes of Parenchyma-Preserving Hepatectomy and Right Hepatectomy for Solitary Small Colorectal Liver Metastasis: A LiverMetSurvey Study |
title_full |
Outcomes of Parenchyma-Preserving Hepatectomy and Right Hepatectomy for Solitary Small Colorectal Liver Metastasis: A LiverMetSurvey Study |
title_fullStr |
Outcomes of Parenchyma-Preserving Hepatectomy and Right Hepatectomy for Solitary Small Colorectal Liver Metastasis: A LiverMetSurvey Study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Outcomes of Parenchyma-Preserving Hepatectomy and Right Hepatectomy for Solitary Small Colorectal Liver Metastasis: A LiverMetSurvey Study |
title_sort |
Outcomes of Parenchyma-Preserving Hepatectomy and Right Hepatectomy for Solitary Small Colorectal Liver Metastasis: A LiverMetSurvey Study |
author |
Hosokawa, I |
author_facet |
Hosokawa, I Allard, MA Mirza, DF Kaiser, G Barroso, E Lapointe, R Laurent, C Ferrero, A Miyazaki, M Adam, R |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Allard, MA Mirza, DF Kaiser, G Barroso, E Lapointe, R Laurent, C Ferrero, A Miyazaki, M Adam, R |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Repositório do Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, EPE |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Hosokawa, I Allard, MA Mirza, DF Kaiser, G Barroso, E Lapointe, R Laurent, C Ferrero, A Miyazaki, M Adam, R |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Aged Cohort Studies Colorectal Neoplasms Disease-Free Survival Female Hepatectomy Humans Liver Neoplasms Male Middle Aged Neoplasm Recurrence, Local Survival Rate Treatment Outcome HCC CHBPT |
topic |
Aged Cohort Studies Colorectal Neoplasms Disease-Free Survival Female Hepatectomy Humans Liver Neoplasms Male Middle Aged Neoplasm Recurrence, Local Survival Rate Treatment Outcome HCC CHBPT |
description |
BACKGROUND: Occasionally, right hepatectomy, rather than parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy, has been performed for solitary small colorectal liver metastasis. The relative oncologic benefits of parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy and right hepatectomy are unclear. This study compared the outcomes of patients with solitary small colorectal liver metastasis in the right liver who underwent parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy and those who underwent right hepatectomy. METHODS: The study population consisted of a multicentric cohort of 21,072 patients operated for colorectal liver metastasis between 2000 and 2015 whose data were collected in the LiverMetSurvey registry. Patients with a pathologically confirmed solitary tumor of less than 30 mm in size in the right liver were included. The short- and long-term outcomes of patients who underwent parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy were compared to those of patients who underwent right hepatectomy. RESULTS: Of the 1,720 patients who were eligible for the study, 1,478 (86%) underwent parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy and 242 (14%) underwent right hepatectomy. The parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy group was associated with lower rates of major complications (3% vs 10%; P < .001) and 90-day mortality (1% vs 3%; P = .008). Liver recurrence occurred similarly in both groups (20% vs 22%; P = .39). The 5-year recurrence-free survival and overall survival rates were similar in both groups. However, in patients with liver-only recurrence, repeat hepatectomy was more frequently performed in the parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy group than in the right hepatectomy group (67% vs 31%; P < .001), and the overall 5-year survival rate was significantly higher in the parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy group than in the right hepatectomy group (55% vs 23%; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy should be considered the standard procedure for solitary small colorectal liver metastasis in the right liver when technically feasible. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017 2017-01-01T00:00:00Z 2019-03-20T16:42:33Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/3204 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/3204 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Surgery. 2017 Aug;162(2):223-232. 10.1016/j.surg.2017.02.012 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mluisa.alvim@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1817548650220355584 |