Outcomes of Parenchyma-Preserving Hepatectomy and Right Hepatectomy for Solitary Small Colorectal Liver Metastasis: A LiverMetSurvey Study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Hosokawa, I
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Allard, MA, Mirza, DF, Kaiser, G, Barroso, E, Lapointe, R, Laurent, C, Ferrero, A, Miyazaki, M, Adam, R
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/3204
Resumo: BACKGROUND: Occasionally, right hepatectomy, rather than parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy, has been performed for solitary small colorectal liver metastasis. The relative oncologic benefits of parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy and right hepatectomy are unclear. This study compared the outcomes of patients with solitary small colorectal liver metastasis in the right liver who underwent parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy and those who underwent right hepatectomy. METHODS: The study population consisted of a multicentric cohort of 21,072 patients operated for colorectal liver metastasis between 2000 and 2015 whose data were collected in the LiverMetSurvey registry. Patients with a pathologically confirmed solitary tumor of less than 30 mm in size in the right liver were included. The short- and long-term outcomes of patients who underwent parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy were compared to those of patients who underwent right hepatectomy. RESULTS: Of the 1,720 patients who were eligible for the study, 1,478 (86%) underwent parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy and 242 (14%) underwent right hepatectomy. The parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy group was associated with lower rates of major complications (3% vs 10%; P < .001) and 90-day mortality (1% vs 3%; P = .008). Liver recurrence occurred similarly in both groups (20% vs 22%; P = .39). The 5-year recurrence-free survival and overall survival rates were similar in both groups. However, in patients with liver-only recurrence, repeat hepatectomy was more frequently performed in the parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy group than in the right hepatectomy group (67% vs 31%; P < .001), and the overall 5-year survival rate was significantly higher in the parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy group than in the right hepatectomy group (55% vs 23%; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy should be considered the standard procedure for solitary small colorectal liver metastasis in the right liver when technically feasible.
id RCAP_094ea70ce378b76286465e7f5d9bebb0
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.chlc.min-saude.pt:10400.17/3204
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Outcomes of Parenchyma-Preserving Hepatectomy and Right Hepatectomy for Solitary Small Colorectal Liver Metastasis: A LiverMetSurvey StudyAgedCohort StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHepatectomyHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeHCC CHBPTBACKGROUND: Occasionally, right hepatectomy, rather than parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy, has been performed for solitary small colorectal liver metastasis. The relative oncologic benefits of parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy and right hepatectomy are unclear. This study compared the outcomes of patients with solitary small colorectal liver metastasis in the right liver who underwent parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy and those who underwent right hepatectomy. METHODS: The study population consisted of a multicentric cohort of 21,072 patients operated for colorectal liver metastasis between 2000 and 2015 whose data were collected in the LiverMetSurvey registry. Patients with a pathologically confirmed solitary tumor of less than 30 mm in size in the right liver were included. The short- and long-term outcomes of patients who underwent parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy were compared to those of patients who underwent right hepatectomy. RESULTS: Of the 1,720 patients who were eligible for the study, 1,478 (86%) underwent parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy and 242 (14%) underwent right hepatectomy. The parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy group was associated with lower rates of major complications (3% vs 10%; P < .001) and 90-day mortality (1% vs 3%; P = .008). Liver recurrence occurred similarly in both groups (20% vs 22%; P = .39). The 5-year recurrence-free survival and overall survival rates were similar in both groups. However, in patients with liver-only recurrence, repeat hepatectomy was more frequently performed in the parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy group than in the right hepatectomy group (67% vs 31%; P < .001), and the overall 5-year survival rate was significantly higher in the parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy group than in the right hepatectomy group (55% vs 23%; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy should be considered the standard procedure for solitary small colorectal liver metastasis in the right liver when technically feasible.ElsevierRepositório do Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, EPEHosokawa, IAllard, MAMirza, DFKaiser, GBarroso, ELapointe, RLaurent, CFerrero, AMiyazaki, MAdam, R2019-03-20T16:42:33Z20172017-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/3204engSurgery. 2017 Aug;162(2):223-232.10.1016/j.surg.2017.02.012info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-03-10T09:41:47Zoai:repositorio.chlc.min-saude.pt:10400.17/3204Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:20:31.942970Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Outcomes of Parenchyma-Preserving Hepatectomy and Right Hepatectomy for Solitary Small Colorectal Liver Metastasis: A LiverMetSurvey Study
title Outcomes of Parenchyma-Preserving Hepatectomy and Right Hepatectomy for Solitary Small Colorectal Liver Metastasis: A LiverMetSurvey Study
spellingShingle Outcomes of Parenchyma-Preserving Hepatectomy and Right Hepatectomy for Solitary Small Colorectal Liver Metastasis: A LiverMetSurvey Study
Hosokawa, I
Aged
Cohort Studies
Colorectal Neoplasms
Disease-Free Survival
Female
Hepatectomy
Humans
Liver Neoplasms
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
Survival Rate
Treatment Outcome
HCC CHBPT
title_short Outcomes of Parenchyma-Preserving Hepatectomy and Right Hepatectomy for Solitary Small Colorectal Liver Metastasis: A LiverMetSurvey Study
title_full Outcomes of Parenchyma-Preserving Hepatectomy and Right Hepatectomy for Solitary Small Colorectal Liver Metastasis: A LiverMetSurvey Study
title_fullStr Outcomes of Parenchyma-Preserving Hepatectomy and Right Hepatectomy for Solitary Small Colorectal Liver Metastasis: A LiverMetSurvey Study
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of Parenchyma-Preserving Hepatectomy and Right Hepatectomy for Solitary Small Colorectal Liver Metastasis: A LiverMetSurvey Study
title_sort Outcomes of Parenchyma-Preserving Hepatectomy and Right Hepatectomy for Solitary Small Colorectal Liver Metastasis: A LiverMetSurvey Study
author Hosokawa, I
author_facet Hosokawa, I
Allard, MA
Mirza, DF
Kaiser, G
Barroso, E
Lapointe, R
Laurent, C
Ferrero, A
Miyazaki, M
Adam, R
author_role author
author2 Allard, MA
Mirza, DF
Kaiser, G
Barroso, E
Lapointe, R
Laurent, C
Ferrero, A
Miyazaki, M
Adam, R
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório do Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, EPE
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Hosokawa, I
Allard, MA
Mirza, DF
Kaiser, G
Barroso, E
Lapointe, R
Laurent, C
Ferrero, A
Miyazaki, M
Adam, R
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Aged
Cohort Studies
Colorectal Neoplasms
Disease-Free Survival
Female
Hepatectomy
Humans
Liver Neoplasms
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
Survival Rate
Treatment Outcome
HCC CHBPT
topic Aged
Cohort Studies
Colorectal Neoplasms
Disease-Free Survival
Female
Hepatectomy
Humans
Liver Neoplasms
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
Survival Rate
Treatment Outcome
HCC CHBPT
description BACKGROUND: Occasionally, right hepatectomy, rather than parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy, has been performed for solitary small colorectal liver metastasis. The relative oncologic benefits of parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy and right hepatectomy are unclear. This study compared the outcomes of patients with solitary small colorectal liver metastasis in the right liver who underwent parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy and those who underwent right hepatectomy. METHODS: The study population consisted of a multicentric cohort of 21,072 patients operated for colorectal liver metastasis between 2000 and 2015 whose data were collected in the LiverMetSurvey registry. Patients with a pathologically confirmed solitary tumor of less than 30 mm in size in the right liver were included. The short- and long-term outcomes of patients who underwent parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy were compared to those of patients who underwent right hepatectomy. RESULTS: Of the 1,720 patients who were eligible for the study, 1,478 (86%) underwent parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy and 242 (14%) underwent right hepatectomy. The parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy group was associated with lower rates of major complications (3% vs 10%; P < .001) and 90-day mortality (1% vs 3%; P = .008). Liver recurrence occurred similarly in both groups (20% vs 22%; P = .39). The 5-year recurrence-free survival and overall survival rates were similar in both groups. However, in patients with liver-only recurrence, repeat hepatectomy was more frequently performed in the parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy group than in the right hepatectomy group (67% vs 31%; P < .001), and the overall 5-year survival rate was significantly higher in the parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy group than in the right hepatectomy group (55% vs 23%; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy should be considered the standard procedure for solitary small colorectal liver metastasis in the right liver when technically feasible.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z
2019-03-20T16:42:33Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/3204
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/3204
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Surgery. 2017 Aug;162(2):223-232.
10.1016/j.surg.2017.02.012
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131301753651200