The Bajratari case: are all resources good enough for EU law?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.34632/mclawreview.2020.7480 |
Resumo: | The Bajratari case is a significant contribution of the Court of Justice of the European Union to the clarification of the meaning of the condition of sufficient resources within the regime of the Citizens Directive 2004/38 (Article 7 (1) (b)). Moreover, it is also a step towards strengthening EU citizen’s right to move and reside in another Member State. In this decision the Court held that income that results from the exercise of professional activities without a lawful residence and employment permit is not to be excluded from the condition of sufficient resources imposed by EU law to a Union citizen who is residing for more than three months in another Member State. |
id |
RCAP_c4d12a8378a943acfcdbd49e228e516a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/7480 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
The Bajratari case: are all resources good enough for EU law?The Bajratari case is a significant contribution of the Court of Justice of the European Union to the clarification of the meaning of the condition of sufficient resources within the regime of the Citizens Directive 2004/38 (Article 7 (1) (b)). Moreover, it is also a step towards strengthening EU citizen’s right to move and reside in another Member State. In this decision the Court held that income that results from the exercise of professional activities without a lawful residence and employment permit is not to be excluded from the condition of sufficient resources imposed by EU law to a Union citizen who is residing for more than three months in another Member State.Universidade Católica Editora2020-04-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.34632/mclawreview.2020.7480oai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/7480Market and Competition Law Review; Vol 4 No 1 (2020); 155-170Market and Competition Law Review; v. 4 n. 1 (2020); 155-1702184-000810.34632/mclawreview.2020.4.1reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/mclawreview/article/view/7480https://doi.org/10.34632/mclawreview.2020.7480https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/mclawreview/article/view/7480/8413Copyright (c) 2020 Benedita Menezes Queirozhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMenezes Queiroz, Benedita2022-09-23T15:10:27Zoai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/7480Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:03:42.294269Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Bajratari case: are all resources good enough for EU law? |
title |
The Bajratari case: are all resources good enough for EU law? |
spellingShingle |
The Bajratari case: are all resources good enough for EU law? Menezes Queiroz, Benedita |
title_short |
The Bajratari case: are all resources good enough for EU law? |
title_full |
The Bajratari case: are all resources good enough for EU law? |
title_fullStr |
The Bajratari case: are all resources good enough for EU law? |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Bajratari case: are all resources good enough for EU law? |
title_sort |
The Bajratari case: are all resources good enough for EU law? |
author |
Menezes Queiroz, Benedita |
author_facet |
Menezes Queiroz, Benedita |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Menezes Queiroz, Benedita |
description |
The Bajratari case is a significant contribution of the Court of Justice of the European Union to the clarification of the meaning of the condition of sufficient resources within the regime of the Citizens Directive 2004/38 (Article 7 (1) (b)). Moreover, it is also a step towards strengthening EU citizen’s right to move and reside in another Member State. In this decision the Court held that income that results from the exercise of professional activities without a lawful residence and employment permit is not to be excluded from the condition of sufficient resources imposed by EU law to a Union citizen who is residing for more than three months in another Member State. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-04-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.34632/mclawreview.2020.7480 oai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/7480 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.34632/mclawreview.2020.7480 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/7480 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/mclawreview/article/view/7480 https://doi.org/10.34632/mclawreview.2020.7480 https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/mclawreview/article/view/7480/8413 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Benedita Menezes Queiroz http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Benedita Menezes Queiroz http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Católica Editora |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Católica Editora |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Market and Competition Law Review; Vol 4 No 1 (2020); 155-170 Market and Competition Law Review; v. 4 n. 1 (2020); 155-170 2184-0008 10.34632/mclawreview.2020.4.1 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130500673044480 |