Bicuspid Aortic Valve Outcomes

• Autor(a) principal: Rodrigues, I
• Data de Publicação: 2017
• Outros Autores: Agapito, A, Sousa, L, Oliveira, JA, Branco, LM, Galrinho, A, Abreu, J, Timóteo, AT, Aguiar Rosa, S, Cruz Ferreira, R
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
• Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/2846
• topic: Adult; Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic; Aortic Valve; Aortic Valve Insufficiency; Aortic Valve Stenosis; Cause of Death; Disease Progression; Echocardiography, Doppler; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Heart Valve Diseases; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Outpatients; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies; Survival Rate; United States; Young Adult; Forecasting; HSM CAR

BACKGROUND: Bicuspid aortic valve is the most common CHD. Its association with early valvular dysfunction, endocarditis, thoracic aorta dilatation, and aortic dissection is well established. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the incidence and predictors of cardiac events in adults with bicuspid aortic valve. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective analysis of cardiac outcomes in ambulatory adults with bicuspid aortic valve followed-up in a tertiary hospital centre. Outcomes were defined as follows: interventional - intervention on the aortic valve or thoracic aorta; medical - death, aortic dissection, aortic valve endocarditis, congestive heart failure, arrhythmias, or ischaemic heart disease requiring hospital admission; and a composite end point of both. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to determine event rates, and predictors of cardiac events were determined by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: A total of 227 patients were followed-up over 13±9 years; 29% of patients developed severe aortic valve dysfunction and 12.3% reached ascending thoracic aorta dimensions above 45 mm. At least one cardiac outcome occurred in 38.8% of patients, with an incidence rate at 20 years of follow-up of 47±4%; 33% of patients were submitted to an aortic valve or thoracic aorta intervention. Survival 20 years after diagnosis was 94±2%. Independent predictors of the composite end point were baseline moderate-severe aortic valve dysfunction (hazard ratio, 3.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.35-7.54; p<0.01) and aortic valve leaflets calcification (hazard ratio, 4.72; 95% confidence interval, 1.91-11.64; p<0.005). CONCLUSIONS: In this study of bicuspid aortic valve, the long-term survival was excellent but with occurrence of frequent cardiovascular events. Baseline aortic valve calcification and dysfunction were the only independent predictors of events.