Smells like team spirit: opening a paradoxical black box
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/public/pub/id/22857 http://hdl.handle.net/10071/8648 |
Resumo: | Despite the common usage of the term, researchers and practitioners have not been able properly to explain what team spirit is and what benefits and drawbacks it might bring to teams. Several definitions have been proposed, but not in a consistent manner. Using a qualitative approach, we worked with one football team to shed light on how individuals experience and characterize team spirit. Our results suggest that team spirit is built around four paradoxes: these are a paradox of selfless egoism; a paradox of results; a paradox of conflict, and a paradox of relationships. Essentially, team spirit can be viewed as an inter-subjectively shared facility with which individual members of a team can balance opposing tensions in a consistent way, managing to maintain a healthy synthesis between individual and collective needs and expectations, preventing the team from dominating the individuals, as well as specific individuals from capturing the team |
id |
RCAP_c71757aaaca0660e2b0c1497346cc587 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/8648 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Smells like team spirit: opening a paradoxical black boxGroupsParadoxesSport teamsTeamsTeam spiritDespite the common usage of the term, researchers and practitioners have not been able properly to explain what team spirit is and what benefits and drawbacks it might bring to teams. Several definitions have been proposed, but not in a consistent manner. Using a qualitative approach, we worked with one football team to shed light on how individuals experience and characterize team spirit. Our results suggest that team spirit is built around four paradoxes: these are a paradox of selfless egoism; a paradox of results; a paradox of conflict, and a paradox of relationships. Essentially, team spirit can be viewed as an inter-subjectively shared facility with which individual members of a team can balance opposing tensions in a consistent way, managing to maintain a healthy synthesis between individual and collective needs and expectations, preventing the team from dominating the individuals, as well as specific individuals from capturing the teamSage2015-03-23T12:16:39Z2014-01-01T00:00:00Z20142015-03-23T12:14:56Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/public/pub/id/22857http://hdl.handle.net/10071/8648eng1741-282XSilva, T.Cunha, M. P.Clegg, S.Neves, P.Rego, A.Rodriges, R.info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-09T17:23:04Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/8648Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:10:36.238660Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Smells like team spirit: opening a paradoxical black box |
title |
Smells like team spirit: opening a paradoxical black box |
spellingShingle |
Smells like team spirit: opening a paradoxical black box Silva, T. Groups Paradoxes Sport teams Teams Team spirit |
title_short |
Smells like team spirit: opening a paradoxical black box |
title_full |
Smells like team spirit: opening a paradoxical black box |
title_fullStr |
Smells like team spirit: opening a paradoxical black box |
title_full_unstemmed |
Smells like team spirit: opening a paradoxical black box |
title_sort |
Smells like team spirit: opening a paradoxical black box |
author |
Silva, T. |
author_facet |
Silva, T. Cunha, M. P. Clegg, S. Neves, P. Rego, A. Rodriges, R. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cunha, M. P. Clegg, S. Neves, P. Rego, A. Rodriges, R. |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, T. Cunha, M. P. Clegg, S. Neves, P. Rego, A. Rodriges, R. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Groups Paradoxes Sport teams Teams Team spirit |
topic |
Groups Paradoxes Sport teams Teams Team spirit |
description |
Despite the common usage of the term, researchers and practitioners have not been able properly to explain what team spirit is and what benefits and drawbacks it might bring to teams. Several definitions have been proposed, but not in a consistent manner. Using a qualitative approach, we worked with one football team to shed light on how individuals experience and characterize team spirit. Our results suggest that team spirit is built around four paradoxes: these are a paradox of selfless egoism; a paradox of results; a paradox of conflict, and a paradox of relationships. Essentially, team spirit can be viewed as an inter-subjectively shared facility with which individual members of a team can balance opposing tensions in a consistent way, managing to maintain a healthy synthesis between individual and collective needs and expectations, preventing the team from dominating the individuals, as well as specific individuals from capturing the team |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-01-01T00:00:00Z 2014 2015-03-23T12:16:39Z 2015-03-23T12:14:56Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/public/pub/id/22857 http://hdl.handle.net/10071/8648 |
url |
https://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/public/pub/id/22857 http://hdl.handle.net/10071/8648 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
1741-282X |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
embargoedAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sage |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sage |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799134660224090112 |