Physiological profile of adult male long-distance trail runners: variations according to competitive level (national or regional)

• Autor(a) principal: Oliveira-Rosado, Joana
• Data de Publicação: 2020
• Outros Autores: Duarte, João P., Silva, Paulo Sousa e, Costa, Daniela, Martinho, Diogo V., Sarmento, Hugo, Santos, João Valente dos, Rama, Luis M., Tavares, Óscar M., Conde, Jorge, Castanheira, Joaquim, Soles-Gonçalves, Rui, Agostinete, Ricardo R., Coelho-e-Silva, Manuel J.
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
• Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10316/105900; https://doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2020AO5256
• topic: Physical exertion/physiology; Running; Exercise test; Oxygen consumption; Anaerobic threshold; Esforço físico/fisiologia; Corrida; Teste de esforço; Consumo de oxigênio; Limiar anaeróbio; Adult; Anaerobic Threshold; Body Mass Index; Cross-Sectional Studies; Exercise Test; Heart Rate; Humans; Male; Oxygen; Reference Values; Running; Statistics, Nonparametric; Time Factors; Athletes

Objective: To describe and identify the importance of different indicators of the aerobic and anaerobic fitness of male ultra-trail runners according to their level of participation (regional or national). Methods: Forty-four male ultra-trail runners were assessed (36.5±7.2 years). They were classified as regional (n=25) and national (n=19). Wingate test was used to assess the anaerobic pathway. A progressive incremental running test was performed and ventilatory thresholds registered, in parallel to heart rate and lactate concentration at the end of the protocol. Comparison between groups was performed using independent samples t-test. Results: No significant differences were found between outputs derived from Wingate test. For aerobic fitness, while examining absolute values, differences were uniquely significant for the second ventilatory threshold (ultra-trail regional runners: 3.78±0.32L.min-1; ultra-trail national runners: 4.03±0.40L. min-1 p<0.05). Meantime, when aerobic fitness was expressed per unit of body mass, differences were significant for the second ventilatory threshold (ultra-trail regional runners: 50.75±6.23mL. kg-1.min-1; ultra-trail national runners: 57.88±4.64mL.kg-1.min-1 p<0.05) and also maximum volume of oxygen (ultra-trail regional runners: 57.33±7.66mL.kg-1.min-1; ultra-trail national runners: 63.39±4.26mL.kg-1.min-1 p<0.05). Conclusion: This study emphasized the importance of expressing physiological variables derived from running protocols per unit of body mass. Also, the second ventilatory threshold appears to be the best and the only aerobic fitness variable to distinguish between trail runners according to competitive level. Maximal oxygen uptake seems of relative interest to distinguish between long distance runners according to competitive level.