Real-world evidence: the low validity of temperature screening for COVID-19 triage

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pană, Bogdan C.
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Lopes, Henrique, Furtunescu, Florentina, Franco, Diogo, Rapcea, Anca, Stanca, Mihai, Tănase, Alina, Coliţă, Anca
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/34272
Resumo: Background: The COVID-19 pandemic forced health-related organizations to rapidly launch country-wide procedures that were easy to use and inexpensive. Body temperature measurement with non-contact infrared thermometers (NCITs) is among the most common procedures, both in hospital settings and in many other entities. However, practical hospital experiences have raised great doubts about the procedure's validity. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the validity of the body temperature measured using NCITs among oncological and transplant patients who took the polymerase chain reaction test for SARS-Cov-2 PCR+ and PCR- in a Romanian Hospital. Methods: Body temperature was measured for 5,231 inpatients using NCITs. The cutoff point for fever was equal to or above 37.3 degrees C. Patients then completed a questionnaire about their symptoms, contact, and travel history. Findings: Fever was detected in five of 53 persons with PCR+, resulting in a sensitivity of 9.43% (95% CI, 3.13-20.66%). No fever was verified in 5,131 of 5,171 persons with PCR-, resulting in a specificity of 99.15% (95% CI, 98.86-99.38%). A defensive vision of NCIT procedure (maximum standard error only in favor) had a sensitivity of 15.09% (95% CI, 6.75-27.59%). Conclusions: The use of NCITs in a triage provides little value for detection of COVID-19. Moreover, it provides a false sense of protection against the disease while possibly discriminating individuals that could present fever due to other reasons, such as oncologic treatments, where fever is a common therapeutical consequence. The consumption of qualified human resources should be considered, especially in the context of the shortage of healthcare professionals worldwide.
id RCAP_cccf412933a2d86a9ff8511fea2ab7b5
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ucp.pt:10400.14/34272
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Real-world evidence: the low validity of temperature screening for COVID-19 triageTriageScreeningNon-contact temperature measurementCOVID-19SARS-CoV-2Background: The COVID-19 pandemic forced health-related organizations to rapidly launch country-wide procedures that were easy to use and inexpensive. Body temperature measurement with non-contact infrared thermometers (NCITs) is among the most common procedures, both in hospital settings and in many other entities. However, practical hospital experiences have raised great doubts about the procedure's validity. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the validity of the body temperature measured using NCITs among oncological and transplant patients who took the polymerase chain reaction test for SARS-Cov-2 PCR+ and PCR- in a Romanian Hospital. Methods: Body temperature was measured for 5,231 inpatients using NCITs. The cutoff point for fever was equal to or above 37.3 degrees C. Patients then completed a questionnaire about their symptoms, contact, and travel history. Findings: Fever was detected in five of 53 persons with PCR+, resulting in a sensitivity of 9.43% (95% CI, 3.13-20.66%). No fever was verified in 5,131 of 5,171 persons with PCR-, resulting in a specificity of 99.15% (95% CI, 98.86-99.38%). A defensive vision of NCIT procedure (maximum standard error only in favor) had a sensitivity of 15.09% (95% CI, 6.75-27.59%). Conclusions: The use of NCITs in a triage provides little value for detection of COVID-19. Moreover, it provides a false sense of protection against the disease while possibly discriminating individuals that could present fever due to other reasons, such as oncologic treatments, where fever is a common therapeutical consequence. The consumption of qualified human resources should be considered, especially in the context of the shortage of healthcare professionals worldwide.Veritati - Repositório Institucional da Universidade Católica PortuguesaPană, Bogdan C.Lopes, HenriqueFurtunescu, FlorentinaFranco, DiogoRapcea, AncaStanca, MihaiTănase, AlinaColiţă, Anca2021-07-26T09:08:26Z2021-06-302021-06-30T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/34272eng2296-256510.3389/fpubh.2021.67269885110243062PMC827795934277541000673096500001info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-12-19T01:37:57Zoai:repositorio.ucp.pt:10400.14/34272Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T18:27:46.284314Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Real-world evidence: the low validity of temperature screening for COVID-19 triage
title Real-world evidence: the low validity of temperature screening for COVID-19 triage
spellingShingle Real-world evidence: the low validity of temperature screening for COVID-19 triage
Pană, Bogdan C.
Triage
Screening
Non-contact temperature measurement
COVID-19
SARS-CoV-2
title_short Real-world evidence: the low validity of temperature screening for COVID-19 triage
title_full Real-world evidence: the low validity of temperature screening for COVID-19 triage
title_fullStr Real-world evidence: the low validity of temperature screening for COVID-19 triage
title_full_unstemmed Real-world evidence: the low validity of temperature screening for COVID-19 triage
title_sort Real-world evidence: the low validity of temperature screening for COVID-19 triage
author Pană, Bogdan C.
author_facet Pană, Bogdan C.
Lopes, Henrique
Furtunescu, Florentina
Franco, Diogo
Rapcea, Anca
Stanca, Mihai
Tănase, Alina
Coliţă, Anca
author_role author
author2 Lopes, Henrique
Furtunescu, Florentina
Franco, Diogo
Rapcea, Anca
Stanca, Mihai
Tănase, Alina
Coliţă, Anca
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Veritati - Repositório Institucional da Universidade Católica Portuguesa
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pană, Bogdan C.
Lopes, Henrique
Furtunescu, Florentina
Franco, Diogo
Rapcea, Anca
Stanca, Mihai
Tănase, Alina
Coliţă, Anca
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Triage
Screening
Non-contact temperature measurement
COVID-19
SARS-CoV-2
topic Triage
Screening
Non-contact temperature measurement
COVID-19
SARS-CoV-2
description Background: The COVID-19 pandemic forced health-related organizations to rapidly launch country-wide procedures that were easy to use and inexpensive. Body temperature measurement with non-contact infrared thermometers (NCITs) is among the most common procedures, both in hospital settings and in many other entities. However, practical hospital experiences have raised great doubts about the procedure's validity. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the validity of the body temperature measured using NCITs among oncological and transplant patients who took the polymerase chain reaction test for SARS-Cov-2 PCR+ and PCR- in a Romanian Hospital. Methods: Body temperature was measured for 5,231 inpatients using NCITs. The cutoff point for fever was equal to or above 37.3 degrees C. Patients then completed a questionnaire about their symptoms, contact, and travel history. Findings: Fever was detected in five of 53 persons with PCR+, resulting in a sensitivity of 9.43% (95% CI, 3.13-20.66%). No fever was verified in 5,131 of 5,171 persons with PCR-, resulting in a specificity of 99.15% (95% CI, 98.86-99.38%). A defensive vision of NCIT procedure (maximum standard error only in favor) had a sensitivity of 15.09% (95% CI, 6.75-27.59%). Conclusions: The use of NCITs in a triage provides little value for detection of COVID-19. Moreover, it provides a false sense of protection against the disease while possibly discriminating individuals that could present fever due to other reasons, such as oncologic treatments, where fever is a common therapeutical consequence. The consumption of qualified human resources should be considered, especially in the context of the shortage of healthcare professionals worldwide.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-07-26T09:08:26Z
2021-06-30
2021-06-30T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/34272
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/34272
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2296-2565
10.3389/fpubh.2021.672698
85110243062
PMC8277959
34277541
000673096500001
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131995596390400