Semantics bias in cross-national comparative analyses : Is it good or bad to have "fair" health?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Schnohr, Christina W.
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Gobina, Inese, Santos, Teresa Cristina, Mazur, Joanna, Alikasifuglu, Mujgan, Välimaa, Raili, Corell, Maria, Hagquist, Curt, Dalmasso, Paola, Movseyan, Yeva, Cavallo, Franco, Van Dorsselaer, Saskia, Torsheim, Torbjørn
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/4639
Resumo: The Health Behavior in School-aged Children is a cross-national study collecting data on social and health indicators on adolescents in 43 countries. The study provides comparable data on health behaviors and health outcomes through the use of a common protocol, which have been a back bone of the study sine its initiation in 1983. Recent years, researchers within the study have noticed a questionable comparability on the widely used item on self-rated health. One of the four response categories to the item "Would you say your health is….?" showed particular variation, as the response category "Fair" varied from 20 % in Latvia and Moldova to 3-4 % in Bulgaria and Macedonia. A qualitative mini-survey of the back-translations showed that the response category "Fair" had a negative slant in 25 countries, a positive slant in 10 countries and was considered neutral in 9 countries. This finding indicates that there are what may be called semantic issues affecting comparability in international studies, since the same original word (in an English original) is interpreted differently across countries and cultures. The paper test and discuss a few possible explanations to this, however, only leaving to future studies to hold a cautious approach to international comparisons if working with the self-rated health item with four response categories.
id RCAP_ccd961beffc85b5415e679ab45906f09
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ispa.pt:10400.12/4639
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Semantics bias in cross-national comparative analyses : Is it good or bad to have "fair" health?Health behavior in school-aged children (HBSC)International comparisonSelf-rated healthMeasurement varianceTranslationThe Health Behavior in School-aged Children is a cross-national study collecting data on social and health indicators on adolescents in 43 countries. The study provides comparable data on health behaviors and health outcomes through the use of a common protocol, which have been a back bone of the study sine its initiation in 1983. Recent years, researchers within the study have noticed a questionable comparability on the widely used item on self-rated health. One of the four response categories to the item "Would you say your health is….?" showed particular variation, as the response category "Fair" varied from 20 % in Latvia and Moldova to 3-4 % in Bulgaria and Macedonia. A qualitative mini-survey of the back-translations showed that the response category "Fair" had a negative slant in 25 countries, a positive slant in 10 countries and was considered neutral in 9 countries. This finding indicates that there are what may be called semantic issues affecting comparability in international studies, since the same original word (in an English original) is interpreted differently across countries and cultures. The paper test and discuss a few possible explanations to this, however, only leaving to future studies to hold a cautious approach to international comparisons if working with the self-rated health item with four response categories.BioMedRepositório do ISPASchnohr, Christina W.Gobina, IneseSantos, Teresa CristinaMazur, JoannaAlikasifuglu, MujganVälimaa, RailiCorell, MariaHagquist, CurtDalmasso, PaolaMovseyan, YevaCavallo, FrancoVan Dorsselaer, SaskiaTorsheim, Torbjørn2016-05-10T18:18:00Z2016-01-01T00:00:00Z2016-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/4639engHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes, 14. doi:10.1186/s12955-016-0469-81477-752510.1186/s12955-016-0469-8info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-09-05T16:40:23Zoai:repositorio.ispa.pt:10400.12/4639Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:22:29.477697Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Semantics bias in cross-national comparative analyses : Is it good or bad to have "fair" health?
title Semantics bias in cross-national comparative analyses : Is it good or bad to have "fair" health?
spellingShingle Semantics bias in cross-national comparative analyses : Is it good or bad to have "fair" health?
Schnohr, Christina W.
Health behavior in school-aged children (HBSC)
International comparison
Self-rated health
Measurement variance
Translation
title_short Semantics bias in cross-national comparative analyses : Is it good or bad to have "fair" health?
title_full Semantics bias in cross-national comparative analyses : Is it good or bad to have "fair" health?
title_fullStr Semantics bias in cross-national comparative analyses : Is it good or bad to have "fair" health?
title_full_unstemmed Semantics bias in cross-national comparative analyses : Is it good or bad to have "fair" health?
title_sort Semantics bias in cross-national comparative analyses : Is it good or bad to have "fair" health?
author Schnohr, Christina W.
author_facet Schnohr, Christina W.
Gobina, Inese
Santos, Teresa Cristina
Mazur, Joanna
Alikasifuglu, Mujgan
Välimaa, Raili
Corell, Maria
Hagquist, Curt
Dalmasso, Paola
Movseyan, Yeva
Cavallo, Franco
Van Dorsselaer, Saskia
Torsheim, Torbjørn
author_role author
author2 Gobina, Inese
Santos, Teresa Cristina
Mazur, Joanna
Alikasifuglu, Mujgan
Välimaa, Raili
Corell, Maria
Hagquist, Curt
Dalmasso, Paola
Movseyan, Yeva
Cavallo, Franco
Van Dorsselaer, Saskia
Torsheim, Torbjørn
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório do ISPA
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Schnohr, Christina W.
Gobina, Inese
Santos, Teresa Cristina
Mazur, Joanna
Alikasifuglu, Mujgan
Välimaa, Raili
Corell, Maria
Hagquist, Curt
Dalmasso, Paola
Movseyan, Yeva
Cavallo, Franco
Van Dorsselaer, Saskia
Torsheim, Torbjørn
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Health behavior in school-aged children (HBSC)
International comparison
Self-rated health
Measurement variance
Translation
topic Health behavior in school-aged children (HBSC)
International comparison
Self-rated health
Measurement variance
Translation
description The Health Behavior in School-aged Children is a cross-national study collecting data on social and health indicators on adolescents in 43 countries. The study provides comparable data on health behaviors and health outcomes through the use of a common protocol, which have been a back bone of the study sine its initiation in 1983. Recent years, researchers within the study have noticed a questionable comparability on the widely used item on self-rated health. One of the four response categories to the item "Would you say your health is….?" showed particular variation, as the response category "Fair" varied from 20 % in Latvia and Moldova to 3-4 % in Bulgaria and Macedonia. A qualitative mini-survey of the back-translations showed that the response category "Fair" had a negative slant in 25 countries, a positive slant in 10 countries and was considered neutral in 9 countries. This finding indicates that there are what may be called semantic issues affecting comparability in international studies, since the same original word (in an English original) is interpreted differently across countries and cultures. The paper test and discuss a few possible explanations to this, however, only leaving to future studies to hold a cautious approach to international comparisons if working with the self-rated health item with four response categories.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-05-10T18:18:00Z
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/4639
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/4639
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 14. doi:10.1186/s12955-016-0469-8
1477-7525
10.1186/s12955-016-0469-8
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv BioMed
publisher.none.fl_str_mv BioMed
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130085360402432